TheoremBase

The Barycentric Decomposition of the Noncommutative Wasserstein Distance

For a coupling of two noncommutative laws, projecting the second variables onto the tracial algebra of the first gives a barycentric law and coupling. The cost splits orthogonally, the squared distance is at most the squared distance to the barycentric law plus the drop in second moment, and at an optimal coupling this is an equality and the barycentric coupling is optimal.

Statement

In the setting of Noncommutative Laws, Couplings and the Wasserstein Distance: Standing Notation, let μ,ν∈Σd\mu,\nu\in\Sigma_{d}. For k∈{d,2d}k\in\{d,2d\} and a law ρ∈Σk\rho\in\Sigma_{k}, (Hρ,Mρ,Ωρ)(\mathcal{H}_{\rho},\mathcal{M}_{\rho},\Omega_{\rho}) is the tracial W*-probability space of The Tracial Algebra of a Noncommutative Law is a Tracial W*-Probability Space: the W*-Closure of the Left Multiplications §w-star; self-adjoint tuples ss in Mμ\mathcal{M}_{\mu} and the law law(s)\mathrm{law}(s) of such a tuple are those of Self-Adjoint Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space and Their Laws.

Notation. Let γ∈Π(μ,ν)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu); then γ∈Σ2d\gamma\in\Sigma_{2d} by Couplings of Noncommutative Laws: the Norm Bound, the Cost Identity, the Tensor, Diagonal and Swapped Couplings, Weak-Star Closedness, and Displacement Interpolants §bound. Since ι1\iota^{1} is the substitution of a=(x1,…,xd)a=(x_{1},\dots,x_{d}) by Couplings of Two Noncommutative Laws and Their Quadratic Cost §marginals and γ∘ι1=μ\gamma\circ\iota^{1}=\mu by Couplings of Two Noncommutative Laws and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling, μ=γ∘σa\mu=\gamma\circ\sigma_{a}; let Eγ:Mγ→MμE_{\gamma}:\mathcal{M}_{\gamma}\to\mathcal{M}_{\mu} be the conditional expectation of Marginals of a Noncommutative Law: the Isometry of GNS Spaces, the Trace-Preserving Embedding of Tracial Algebras and the Conditional Expectation for the law γ∈Σ2d\gamma\in\Sigma_{2d} and this aa, the operators LpL_{p} acting on Hγ\mathcal{H}_{\gamma} for p∈P2dp\in\mathcal{P}_{2d} and on Hμ\mathcal{H}_{\mu} for p∈Pdp\in\mathcal{P}_{d}. For j∈[d]j\in[d] let

zjγ=Eγ(Lxd+j)∈Mμ;z^{\gamma}_{j}=E_{\gamma}\bigl(L_{x_{d+j}}\bigr)\in\mathcal{M}_{\mu};

here Lxd+j∈MγL_{x_{d+j}}\in\mathcal{M}_{\gamma} by The Tracial Algebra of a Noncommutative Law is a Tracial W*-Probability Space: the W*-Closure of the Left Multiplications §w-star, and zjγz^{\gamma}_{j} is self-adjoint, because Lxd+j∗=Lxd+jL_{x_{d+j}}^{*}=L_{x_{d+j}} by Left and Right Multiplication Operators on the Complex GNS Space of a Noncommutative Law: Boundedness, Algebra Rules, Adjoints, Commutation, the Vacuum and the Conjugation §adjoint and EγE_{\gamma} commutes with adjoints by Marginals of a Noncommutative Law: the Isometry of GNS Spaces, the Trace-Preserving Embedding of Tracial Algebras and the Conditional Expectation §expectation. The operators Lx1,…,LxdL_{x_{1}},\dots,L_{x_{d}} on Hμ\mathcal{H}_{\mu} are self-adjoint elements of Mμ\mathcal{M}_{\mu} by Left and Right Multiplication Operators on the Complex GNS Space of a Noncommutative Law: Boundedness, Algebra Rules, Adjoints, Commutation, the Vacuum and the Conjugation §adjoint and The Tracial Algebra of a Noncommutative Law is a Tracial W*-Probability Space: the W*-Closure of the Left Multiplications §w-star. Write ζγ=law(zγ)\zeta_{\gamma}=\mathrm{law}(z^{\gamma}) for the law of the self-adjoint dd-tuple zγ=(z1γ,…,zdγ)z^{\gamma}=(z^{\gamma}_{1},\dots,z^{\gamma}_{d}), and βγ=law(Lx1,…,Lxd,z1γ,…,zdγ)\beta_{\gamma}=\mathrm{law}(L_{x_{1}},\dots,L_{x_{d}},z^{\gamma}_{1},\dots,z^{\gamma}_{d}) for the law of this self-adjoint 2d2d-tuple in Mμ\mathcal{M}_{\mu}.

1. (Barycentric coupling) For every γ∈Π(μ,ν)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu), ζγ∈Σd\zeta_{\gamma}\in\Sigma_{d} and βγ∈Π(μ,ζγ)\beta_{\gamma}\in\Pi(\mu,\zeta_{\gamma}). If ν∈Σd,R\nu\in\Sigma_{d,R} for a real R>0R>0, then ζγ∈Σd,R\zeta_{\gamma}\in\Sigma_{d,R}.

2. (Orthogonal splitting of the cost) For every γ∈Π(μ,ν)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu), M(ζγ)≤M(ν)M(\zeta_{\gamma})\le M(\nu) and

I(γ)=I(βγ)+M(ν)−M(ζγ).I(\gamma)=I(\beta_{\gamma})+M(\nu)-M(\zeta_{\gamma}).

3. (Upper bound) For every γ∈Π(μ,ν)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu),

W2(μ,ν)2≤W2(μ,ζγ)2+M(ν)−M(ζγ).W_{2}(\mu,\nu)^{2}\le W_{2}(\mu,\zeta_{\gamma})^{2}+M(\nu)-M(\zeta_{\gamma}).

4. (Optimal couplings) If γ∈Π(μ,ν)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) is optimal, then βγ\beta_{\gamma} is an optimal coupling of μ\mu and ζγ\zeta_{\gamma}, and

W2(μ,ν)2=W2(μ,ζγ)2+M(ν)−M(ζγ).W_{2}(\mu,\nu)^{2}=W_{2}(\mu,\zeta_{\gamma})^{2}+M(\nu)-M(\zeta_{\gamma}).

5. (Variational formula) The set {W2(μ,ζγ)2+M(ν)−M(ζγ): γ∈Π(μ,ν)}\{W_{2}(\mu,\zeta_{\gamma})^{2}+M(\nu)-M(\zeta_{\gamma}):\ \gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu)\} has least element W2(μ,ν)2W_{2}(\mu,\nu)^{2}, attained at every optimal coupling γ∈Π(μ,ν)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu); optimal couplings exist by The Noncommutative Wasserstein Distance: Existence of Optimal Couplings, Symmetry, Separation, a Moment Bound, Weak-Star Lower Semicontinuity, and Displacement Interpolation §attained.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…