TheoremBase

Feedback Drifts: the Energy Bound in the Word Gauge, the Momentum Pairing and Two-Sided Tangency

Feedback drifts lie in the word gauge space with norm at most kappadkappa_d times the square root of the control energy, pair with a momentum p as the limit of the traces of the control against the truncated cyclic gradients of p, and are two-sided tangent vectors to the space of unitary laws.

Statement

In the setting of Unitary Laws with Free Unitary Noise: Standing Data, with the conventions of Unitary Laws with Free Unitary Noise: Standing Data §spaces and the sets Tλ±T^{\pm}_{\lambda} of two-sided tangent vectors, let [d][d] be the initial segment determined by dd, let Wd∘W^{\circ}_{d} be the set of cyclically reduced words with lengths ∣w∣|w|, let cwc_{w} be the weights, let Pd\mathcal{P}_{d} be the set of polynomial controls with energies ∥a∥λ2\lVert a\rVert_{\lambda}^{2}, let ba(λ)b_{a}(\lambda) be the feedback drift, let Ξp,ni\Xi^{i}_{p,n} be the truncated cyclic gradients, and let λ(X)\lambda(X) be the evaluation of a word polynomial. Let C\mathbb{C} be the complex numbers with modulus ∣z∣|z|. Then the following hold.

1. (Constant) The map w↦cw∣w∣2w\mapsto c_{w}|w|^{2} on Wd∘W^{\circ}_{d} is summable; its sum is nonnegative as in The Word Gauge: Weights, the Space of Weighted Square-Summable Word Functions, Its Norm and Inner Product, and the Length-Weighted Gauge §norm, and κd\kappa_{d} denotes its nonnegative square root.

2. (Energy bound) For every a∈Pda\in\mathcal{P}_{d}, λ∈Ld\lambda\in\mathcal{L}_{d} and w∈Wd∘w\in W^{\circ}_{d}, ∣ba(λ)(w)∣≤∣w∣ ∥a∥λ|b_{a}(\lambda)(w)|\le|w|\,\lVert a\rVert_{\lambda}. Consequently ba(λ)∈Edb_{a}(\lambda)\in E_{d} and ∥ba(λ)∥d≤κd∥a∥λ\lVert b_{a}(\lambda)\rVert_{d}\le\kappa_{d}\lVert a\rVert_{\lambda}.

3. (Momentum pairing) For every a∈Pda\in\mathcal{P}_{d}, λ∈Ld\lambda\in\mathcal{L}_{d} and p∈Edp\in E_{d}, the number λ(ai Ξp,ni)\lambda\bigl(a^{i}\,\Xi^{i}_{p,n}\bigr) is real for every n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} and every i∈[d]i\in[d], and

⟨p,ba(λ)⟩d=lim⁡n→∞∑i∈[d]λ(ai Ξp,ni),\bigl\langle p,b_{a}(\lambda)\bigr\rangle_{d}=\lim_{n\to\infty}\sum_{i\in[d]}\lambda\bigl(a^{i}\,\Xi^{i}_{p,n}\bigr),

the limit existing in (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}).

4. (Tangency) For every a∈Pda\in\mathcal{P}_{d} and λ∈Ld\lambda\in\mathcal{L}_{d}, ba(λ)∈Tλ±b_{a}(\lambda)\in T^{\pm}_{\lambda}.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…