TheoremBase

Conditioning in Two Steps: Composing a Conditional Kernel Given a Map with a Conditional Kernel Given a Function of It

Conditioning in two steps: averaging a conditional kernel given a map against a conditional kernel of that map's law given a function of it yields a conditional kernel given the composite.

Statement

In the setting of Measure Spaces and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation, let (Z,dZ)(Z,d_{Z}), (Y1,d1)(Y_{1},d_{1}) and (Y2,d2)(Y_{2},d_{2}) be metric spaces with Borel σ\sigma-algebras B(Z)\mathcal{B}(Z), B(Y1)\mathcal{B}(Y_{1}) and B(Y2)\mathcal{B}(Y_{2}), and let q:Z→Y1q:Z\to Y_{1} and s:Y1→Y2s:Y_{1}\to Y_{2} be measurable with respect to these σ\sigma-algebras, so that s∘qs\circ q is measurable by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. Let π\pi be a Borel measure on (Z,dZ)(Z,d_{Z}) with π(Z)=1\pi(Z)=1, and let ν1=q#π\nu_{1}=q_{\#}\pi and ν2=(s∘q)#π\nu_{2}=(s\circ q)_{\#}\pi be the image measures of claim 1 of that lemma, which are probability measures on (Y1,B(Y1))(Y_{1},\mathcal{B}(Y_{1})) and (Y2,B(Y2))(Y_{2},\mathcal{B}(Y_{2})), that is, Borel measures of total mass 11 on (Y1,d1)(Y_{1},d_{1}) and (Y2,d2)(Y_{2},d_{2}). For every A∈B(Y2)A\in\mathcal{B}(Y_{2}) one has (s∘q)−1(A)=q−1(s−1(A))(s\circ q)^{-1}(A)=q^{-1}(s^{-1}(A)), so ν2(A)=ν1(s−1(A))\nu_{2}(A)=\nu_{1}(s^{-1}(A)); that is, ν2=s#ν1\nu_{2}=s_{\#}\nu_{1}.

Let κ\kappa be a conditional kernel of π\pi given qq, and let λ\lambda be a conditional kernel of ν1\nu_{1} given ss, that is, one in the sense of that definition with (Y1,d1)(Y_{1},d_{1}), (Y2,d2)(Y_{2},d_{2}), ss and ν1\nu_{1} in place of (Z,dZ)(Z,d_{Z}), (Y,dY)(Y,d_{Y}), qq and π\pi, whose image measure there is s#ν1=ν2s_{\#}\nu_{1}=\nu_{2}. Write κy=κ(y,⋅)\kappa_{y}=\kappa(y,\cdot) and λw=λ(w,⋅)\lambda_{w}=\lambda(w,\cdot). For w∈Y2w\in Y_{2}, λw\lambda_{w} is a probability measure on (Y1,B(Y1))(Y_{1},\mathcal{B}(Y_{1})) by Probability Kernels Between Measurable Spaces §kernel, hence a Borel measure on (Y1,d1)(Y_{1},d_{1}) of finite mass; for B∈B(Z)B\in\mathcal{B}(Z) the function y↦κ(y,B)y\mapsto\kappa(y,B) on Y1Y_{1} is measurable with respect to B(Y1)\mathcal{B}(Y_{1}) and takes values in [0,1][0,1] by the same definition, so it is integrable with respect to λw\lambda_{w} by claim 6(b) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. For a measure λ′\lambda' and a function hh integrable with respect to it, ∫h(y) λ′(dy)\int h(y)\,\lambda'(dy) denotes ∫h dλ′\int h\,d\lambda'.

1. (Composition) The function κ∘λ:Y2×B(Z)→R\kappa\circ\lambda:Y_{2}\times\mathcal{B}(Z)\to\mathbb{R},

(κ∘λ)(w,B)=∫Y1κ(y,B) λw(dy),(\kappa\circ\lambda)(w,B)=\int_{Y_{1}}\kappa(y,B)\,\lambda_{w}(dy),

is a probability kernel from (Y2,B(Y2))(Y_{2},\mathcal{B}(Y_{2})) to (Z,B(Z))(Z,\mathcal{B}(Z)) and a conditional kernel of π\pi given s∘qs\circ q.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…