Conditioning in two steps: averaging a conditional kernel given a map against a conditional kernel of that map's law given a function of it yields a conditional kernel given the composite.
Let κ be a conditional kernel of π given q, and let λ be a conditional kernel of ν1 given s, that is, one in the sense of that definition with (Y1,d1), (Y2,d2), s and ν1 in place of (Z,dZ), (Y,dY), q and π, whose image measure there is s#ν1=ν2. Write κy=κ(y,⋅) and λw=λ(w,⋅). For w∈Y2, λw is a probability measure on (Y1,B(Y1)) by Probability Kernels Between Measurable Spaces §kernel, hence a Borel measure on (Y1,d1) of finite mass; for B∈B(Z) the function y↦κ(y,B) on Y1 is measurable with respect to B(Y1) and takes values in [0,1] by the same definition, so it is integrable with respect to λw by claim 6(b) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. For a measure λ′ and a function h integrable with respect to it, ∫h(y)λ′(dy) denotes ∫hdλ′.
1. (Composition) The function κ∘λ:Y2×B(Z)→R,
(κ∘λ)(w,B)=∫Y1κ(y,B)λw(dy),
is a probability kernel from (Y2,B(Y2)) to (Z,B(Z)) and a conditional kernel of π given s∘q.
Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.