Composing a class in the Sobolev space of the torus with a continuously differentiable function of bounded derivative again lies in that space, and its weak partial derivatives are given by the classical chain rule formula.
We work in the setting of The Flat Torus: Standing Notation, used here with a natural number satisfying ; the cell , the measure space , and the classes and spaces with the class map , for a real number with , are the ones fixed there. Let denote the seminorm of . Weak partial derivatives of classes and the notation are those of The Weak Partial Derivative on the Torus, and is the Sobolev space fixed there. A representative of a class is a member of with ; two representatives of one class agree almost everywhere by The Lebesgue Space of Power-Integrable Functions §equivalence.
Let be the real numbers and let be the absolute value on . Differentiability of a function from to at a point, and the derivative there, are those of that definition; they apply at every point because by claim 1 of One-Dimensional Derivatives, Partial Derivatives, and Smoothness on the Real Line the set is an interval every point of which is an interior point of it. For differentiable at every point of , denotes the function from to whose value at is the derivative of at . We regard also as the Euclidean space , which is open in itself by claim 1 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and Maps are Continuous; being of class on is as defined there, and denotes the partial derivative with respect to the first variable. For and , denotes the function from to whose value at is , and for the pointwise product is the function whose value at is .
Let satisfy and let be of class on ; then is differentiable at every point of and for every , by claim 2 of One-Dimensional Derivatives, Partial Derivatives, and Smoothness on the Real Line. Suppose further that
Then the following hold.
1. (Lipschitz bound)¶ For all ,
2. (The composed class)¶ Let and let be a representative of . Then ; and if is a further representative of , then and agree almost everywhere, so that the class depends only on . We write for that class.
3. (The chain rule)¶ Let , let be a representative of and, for , let be a representative of . Then for every the pointwise product belongs to and
Moreover and
Loading…
Prerequisites
No prerequisites tracked.
Dependents
No dependents yet.
Dependent proofs
No dependent proofs yet.
No relations recorded yet.