TheoremBase

The Riccati Shift: the Renormalised Operator at the Free Solution plus a Regular Function is the Shifted Operator, Which Satisfies the Hilbert-Triple Comparison Hypotheses, and Its Touching Points Lie in the State Space

Subtracting the free solution turns the renormalised Wick-square operator into the shifted Hilbert-triple operator, which satisfies the hypotheses of the second-order comparison theory; and at every touching point of a continuous viscosity sub- or supersolution of the shifted equation the point lies in the Sobolev space of order -1 and the equation holds exactly.

Statement

In the setting of The Wick-Square Problem on the Sobolev Triple of Order Two: Standing Notation, let Cg,ℓg∈RC_{g},\ell_{g}\in\mathbb{R} be nonnegative and let g:V→Rg:V\to\mathbb{R} satisfy

∣g(x)∣≤Cgand∣g(x)−g(y)∣≤ℓg ∣x−y∣Hfor all x,y∈V.|g(x)|\le C_{g}\quad\text{and}\quad|g(x)-g(y)|\le\ell_{g}\,|x-y|_{H}\qquad\text{for all }x,y\in V .

Let F♯F^{\sharp} be the shifted operator for gg, with δ\delta-shifts Fδ♯−F^{\sharp-}_{\delta} and Fδ♯+F^{\sharp+}_{\delta}. Let D\mathcal{D} and FF be the domain and the renormalised operator for the running cost g∣H−1g|_{H^{-1}}, let PP be the Gaussian penalty, and let LL and ∣D⋅∣2|D\cdot|^{2} be the uncut free-field generator and gradient energy. Regular functions are those of Regular Functions for the Wick-Square Problem: Diagonal Quadratics of Curvature of Order the Inverse Squared Weight, plus Twice Differentiable Functions on the Sobolev Space of Order -3, and the mode derivatives of a regular function are given by Regular Functions: Mode Derivatives, the Free-Field Generator, the Gradient Energy, the Renormalised Operator at the Gaussian Penalty plus a Regular Function, and Linear Combinations §derivatives. Then the following hold.

1. (The shift identity) Let χ:H−1→R\chi:H^{-1}\to\mathbb{R} be regular. Then u0+χ−Pu_{0}+\chi-P is regular, and for every x∈H−1x\in H^{-1}: LχL\chi is defined at xx, ∣Dχ(x)∣2|D\chi(x)|^{2} is defined, the family k↦2qkx(k) ∂kχ(x)k\mapsto2q_{k}x(k)\,\partial_{k}\chi(x) is cube-summable, (u0+χ,x)∈D(u_{0}+\chi,x)\in\mathcal{D}, and

F[u0+χ](x)=γ χ(x)−Lχ(x)+∑k∈Zn2qkx(k) ∂kχ(x)+12 ∣Dχ(x)∣2−g(x).F[u_{0}+\chi](x)=\gamma\,\chi(x)-L\chi(x)+\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}}2q_{k}x(k)\,\partial_{k}\chi(x)+\tfrac12\,|D\chi(x)|^{2}-g(x).

2. (The triple form) Let φ∈C2(H)\varphi\in C^{2}(H) and c∈Rc\in\mathbb{R}, and let χ=(φ+c h)∣H−1\chi=(\varphi+c\,h)|_{H^{-1}}. Then χ\chi is regular, and for every x∈H−1x\in H^{-1} the right-hand side of the identity in clause 1 equals

F♯(x, φ(x)+c h(x), Dφ(x)+c Ax, D2φ(x)∣V+c IV).F^{\sharp}\bigl(x,\ \varphi(x)+c\,h(x),\ D\varphi(x)+c\,Ax,\ D^{2}\varphi(x)|_{V}+c\,I_{V}\bigr).

In particular, for every real δ>0\delta>0 and x∈H−1x\in H^{-1},

F[u0+(φ+δh)∣H−1](x)=Fδ♯−(x,φ(x),Dφ(x),D2φ(x)),F[u0+(φ−δh)∣H−1](x)=Fδ♯+(x,φ(x),Dφ(x),D2φ(x)).F\bigl[u_{0}+(\varphi+\delta h)|_{H^{-1}}\bigr](x)=F^{\sharp-}_{\delta}\bigl(x,\varphi(x),D\varphi(x),D^{2}\varphi(x)\bigr),\qquad F\bigl[u_{0}+(\varphi-\delta h)|_{H^{-1}}\bigr](x)=F^{\sharp+}_{\delta}\bigl(x,\varphi(x),D\varphi(x),D^{2}\varphi(x)\bigr).

3. (The comparison hypotheses) F♯F^{\sharp} is degenerate elliptic and locally strictly proper, and satisfies the second-order structure condition, the shift-continuity condition and the tail-insensitivity condition.

4. (Comparison for the shifted equation) If w1,w2:H→Rw_{1},w_{2}:H\to\mathbb{R} and C∈RC\in\mathbb{R} satisfy w1≤Cw_{1}\le C and −C≤w2-C\le w_{2} on HH, w1w_{1} is a viscosity subsolution and w2w_{2} a viscosity supersolution of F♯F^{\sharp} on HH, then w1(x)≤w2(x)w_{1}(x)\le w_{2}(x) for every x∈Vx\in V.

5. (Touching points lie in the state space) Let w:H→Rw:H\to\mathbb{R} be bounded and continuous on HH, let δ∈R\delta\in\mathbb{R} be positive, let φ∈C2(H)\varphi\in C^{2}(H) and let x^∈V\hat{x}\in V.

(a) If ww is a viscosity subsolution of F♯F^{\sharp} on HH and the function V→RV\to\mathbb{R}, x↦w(x)−δh(x)−φ(x)x\mapsto w(x)-\delta h(x)-\varphi(x), has a local maximum relative to VV at x^\hat{x}, then x^∈H−1\hat{x}\in H^{-1} and

Fδ♯−(x^, w(x^)−δh(x^), Dφ(x^), D2φ(x^))≤0.F^{\sharp-}_{\delta}\bigl(\hat{x},\ w(\hat{x})-\delta h(\hat{x}),\ D\varphi(\hat{x}),\ D^{2}\varphi(\hat{x})\bigr)\le0 .

(b) If ww is a viscosity supersolution of F♯F^{\sharp} on HH and the function V→RV\to\mathbb{R}, x↦w(x)+δh(x)−φ(x)x\mapsto w(x)+\delta h(x)-\varphi(x), has a local minimum relative to VV at x^\hat{x}, then x^∈H−1\hat{x}\in H^{-1} and

0≤Fδ♯+(x^, w(x^)+δh(x^), Dφ(x^), D2φ(x^)).0\le F^{\sharp+}_{\delta}\bigl(\hat{x},\ w(\hat{x})+\delta h(\hat{x}),\ D\varphi(\hat{x}),\ D^{2}\varphi(\hat{x})\bigr).

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…