TheoremBase

The Galerkin Wick-Square Problem at a Cutoff as a Gaussian-Dressed Problem Relative to the Free-Field Gaussian: the Coupling Condition, the Riccati Coefficients, the Riccati Potential, the Profile and the Running Cost

At each cutoff, the Galerkin Wick-square data match the Gaussian dressing relative to the free-field Gaussian with temperature nu/2: the coupling condition holds, the dressing Riccati coefficients are twice the Galerkin ones, the Galerkin Riccati potential is the dressed Gaussian potential, the integrated free Galerkin quadratic is the dressing profile plus a constant, and the running cost in coordinates is bounded and Lipschitz.

Statement

In the settings of The Wick-Square Problem on the Sobolev Triple of Order Two: Standing Notation, The Galerkin Problems of the Wick-Square Problem: Standing Notation for Cubes of Modes, Coordinates, the Free Galerkin Quadratic and the Riccati Potential and The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background, let N∈NN\in\mathbb{N}, with mm, κN\kappa_{N}, the coordinate map ιN\iota_{N}, the free Galerkin quadratic u~N\tilde{u}_{N} and the Riccati potential ΦN\Phi_{N} as fixed there. We also work in the setting of The Intrinsic Calculus on the Wasserstein Space: Standing Notation with its dimension dd taken to be mm; the letters kk, mm, qkq_{k} and κN\kappa_{N} keep the meanings of The Galerkin Problems of the Wick-Square Problem: Standing Notation for Cubes of Modes, Coordinates, the Free Galerkin Quadratic and the Riccati Potential (not those of Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation §dimensions), γ\gamma is the discount rate of The Wick-Square Problem on the Torus: Standing Notation §parameters, a Gaussian measure always carries a subscript, and probability measures on Rm\mathbb{R}^{m} are written ρ\rho. Let cN=(c1N,…,cmN)∈Rmc^{N}=(c^{N}_{1},\dots,c^{N}_{m})\in\mathbb{R}^{m} with ciN=cκN(i)c^{N}_{i}=c_{\kappa_{N}(i)}, the free-field variance of the mode κN(i)\kappa_{N}(i), which is positive, so that cNc^{N} is a variance vector; let βN=(β,…,β)∈Rm\beta^{N}=(\beta,\dots,\beta)\in\mathbb{R}^{m}. The data at cutoff NN are the variance vector cNc^{N}, the temperature ν2\tfrac{\nu}{2}, the discount γ\gamma, the control cost 11, the couplings βN\beta^{N} and the zero running cost on P2(Rm)\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{m}); here ν2\tfrac{\nu}{2} and γ\gamma are positive by The Wick-Square Problem on the Torus: Standing Notation §parameters. By clause 1 below, Gaussian Dressing of the Wick-Square Cost: the Riccati Coefficients, the Dressed Variances, the Quadratic Profile, the Shifted Pair and the Shifted Operator applies to these data, and we let b1,…,bmb_{1},\dots,b_{m} be its Riccati coefficients, c′c' its dressed variances, ΨN\Psi_{N} its quadratic profile (written Φ0\Phi_{0} there) and sNs_{N} the real number written ee in Gaussian Dressing of the Wick-Square Cost: the Riccati Coefficients, the Dressed Variances, the Quadratic Profile, the Shifted Pair and the Shifted Operator §operator, all for the data at cutoff NN.

1. (The coupling condition) For every i∈[m]i\in[m], ν2 (ciN)−1=μκN(i)\tfrac{\nu}{2}\,(c^{N}_{i})^{-1}=\mu_{\kappa_{N}(i)} and

μκN(i)2+γ μκN(i)+2β>0,\mu_{\kappa_{N}(i)}^{2}+\gamma\,\mu_{\kappa_{N}(i)}+2\beta>0 ,

which is the coupling hypothesis of Gaussian Dressing of the Wick-Square Cost: the Riccati Coefficients, the Dressed Variances, the Quadratic Profile, the Shifted Pair and the Shifted Operator for the data at cutoff NN.

2. (Relation to the Riccati coefficients qkq_{k}) bi=2qκN(i)b_{i}=2q_{\kappa_{N}(i)} for every i∈[m]i\in[m].

3. (The Riccati potential) For every z∈Rmz\in\mathbb{R}^{m}, ΦN(z)=ν4∣z∣c′2\Phi_{N}(z)=\tfrac{\nu}{4}|z|_{c'}^{2}, with the weighted square of The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §scaling.

4. (The profile) For every ρ∈P2(Rm)\rho\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{m}) the function u~N\tilde{u}_{N} is integrable with respect to ρ\rho and

∫Rmu~N dρ=ΨN(ρ)+γ−1sN.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}\tilde{u}_{N}\,d\rho=\Psi_{N}(\rho)+\gamma^{-1}s_{N}.

5. (The running cost) ∣ιNz∣H≤∥z∥|\iota_{N}z|_{H}\le\lVert z\rVert for every z∈Rmz\in\mathbb{R}^{m}. Consequently, if Cg,ℓg∈RC_{g},\ell_{g}\in\mathbb{R} are nonnegative and g:H−1→Rg:H^{-1}\to\mathbb{R} satisfies ∣g(x)∣≤Cg|g(x)|\le C_{g} and ∣g(x)−g(y)∣≤ℓg ∣x−y∣H|g(x)-g(y)|\le\ell_{g}\,|x-y|_{H} for all x,y∈H−1x,y\in H^{-1}, then ∣g(ιNz)∣≤Cg|g(\iota_{N}z)|\le C_{g} and ∣g(ιNz)−g(ιNz′)∣≤ℓg∥z−z′∥|g(\iota_{N}z)-g(\iota_{N}z')|\le\ell_{g}\lVert z-z'\rVert for all z,z′∈Rmz,z'\in\mathbb{R}^{m}; in particular the function g∘ιN:Rm→Rg\circ\iota_{N}:\mathbb{R}^{m}\to\mathbb{R} is bounded and uniformly continuous for the Euclidean distance and the metric of The Absolute Value Metric on the Real Line.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…