TheoremBase

Score Bounds at Envelope Test Inequalities from the Absorption Slack

For a Hamiltonian that absorbs shifts at the noise level and is bounded at zero momentum at bounded positions, a momentum shift that satisfies either envelope test inequality at a bounded position has norm at most a constant over the shift size, with the admissible shift sizes depending only on the position bound and the constant on the position bound, the momentum bound and the bound on the discount term.

Statement

In the setting of The Discounted HJB Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall, Envelope Form: Standing Notation, let ρ,σ>0\rho,\sigma>0 be the discount rate and the noise intensity and let H:Σ2d2→R\mathcal{H}:\Sigma^{2}_{2d}\to\mathbb{R} be the Hamiltonian, all as fixed in The Discounted HJB Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall, Envelope Form: Standing Notation §data. Assume that the Hamiltonian H\mathcal{H} absorbs shifts at noise level σ\sigma and is bounded at zero momentum at bounded positions. Lifts HM\mathcal{H}_{M} are those of Plan Jets and Hamiltonians on Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws: Standing Notation §lifts; sums, real multiples and the pairing ⟨⋅,⋅⟩2\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{2} of L2L^{2} dd-tuples are those of Plan Jets and Hamiltonians on Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws: Standing Notation §pairing; the L2L^{2} norm and laws are those of Tracial W*-Probability Spaces and Square-Integrable Tuples: Standing Notation §tuples; and for real r>0r>0, κd(Σd,r)\kappa_{d}(\Sigma_{d,r}) is the image of the set Σd,r\Sigma_{d,r} of Noncommutative Laws, Couplings and the Wasserstein Distance: Standing Notation §laws under the canonical map κd\kappa_{d} of Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws: Standing Notation §laws.

For every real r>0r>0 there is a real δ1>0\delta_{1}>0 such that for all reals m≥0m\ge0 and b≥0b\ge0 there is a real C≥0C\ge0 such that the following holds for every tracial W*-probability space (H,M,Ω)(H,M,\Omega), all L2L^{2} dd-tuples X,P,QX,P,Q of (H,M,Ω)(H,M,\Omega) with law(X)∈κd(Σd,r)\mathrm{law}(X)\in\kappa_{d}(\Sigma_{d,r}) and ∥P∥2≤m\lVert P\rVert_{2}\le m, every real aa with ∣a∣≤b|a|\le b and every real δ\delta with 0<δ≤δ10<\delta\le\delta_{1}.

1. (Subsolution side) If

ρa+HM(X,P+δQ)+σ22(⟨Q,P⟩2+δ ∥Q∥22)≤0,\rho a+\mathcal{H}_{M}(X,P+\delta Q)+\frac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\Bigl(\langle Q,P\rangle_{2}+\delta\,\lVert Q\rVert_{2}^{2}\Bigr)\le0,

then ∥Q∥2≤C/δ\lVert Q\rVert_{2}\le C/\delta.

2. (Supersolution side) If

ρa+HM(X,P−δQ)+σ22(⟨Q,P⟩2−δ ∥Q∥22)≥0,\rho a+\mathcal{H}_{M}(X,P-\delta Q)+\frac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\Bigl(\langle Q,P\rangle_{2}-\delta\,\lVert Q\rVert_{2}^{2}\Bigr)\ge0,

then ∥Q∥2≤C/δ\lVert Q\rVert_{2}\le C/\delta.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…