TheoremBase

Well-Posedness of the Allen-Cahn Hamilton-Jacobi Equation on the Torus

On the torus of dimension at most three, the Hamilton-Jacobi equation whose drift is the Allen-Cahn field has a unique bounded continuous viscosity solution on the square-integrable space, obtained by instantiating the general Hilbert-triple well-posedness theorem at the Sobolev triple and the cube nonlinearity.

Statement

We work in the setting of The Flat Torus: Standing Notation, used here with a natural number nn satisfying 1≤n1\le n and n≤3n\le3; the cell QQ, the classes Lt(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{t}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and spaces Lt(Tn)L^{t}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) with the class map [ ⋅ ][\,\cdot\,], for a real number tt with 1≤t1\le t, the periodic classes CperC_{\mathrm{per}} and Cper2C^{2}_{\mathrm{per}}, and the restriction v∣Qv|_{Q} are the ones fixed there; the Laplacian Δv\Delta v of a map vv of class C2C^{2} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} is that of The Laplacian of a Twice Continuously Differentiable Function (i), the set Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} being open in itself by claim 1 of Euclidean Space Is Open in Itself. A representative of a class U∈Lt(Tn)U\in L^{t}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) is a member uu of Lt(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{t}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) with [u]=U[u]=U. Weak partial derivatives of classes are those of The Weak Partial Derivative on the Torus, and H1(Tn)H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), with its inner product ⟨ ⋅ ,⋅ ⟩H1\langle\,\cdot\,,\cdot\,\rangle_{H^{1}} and norm ∥ ⋅ ∥H1\lVert\,\cdot\,\rVert_{H^{1}}, is the Sobolev space fixed there; ⟨ ⋅ ,⋅ ⟩L2\langle\,\cdot\,,\cdot\,\rangle_{L^{2}}, ∥ ⋅ ∥L2\lVert\,\cdot\,\rVert_{L^{2}} and dL2d_{L^{2}} are the inner product, norm and distance of L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}). For a map vv defined on QQ or on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}, the pointwise cube v3v^{3} is the map with the same domain whose value at yy is the third power of v(y)v(y); pointwise sums, differences and real multiples of maps with a common domain are formed valuewise. The metric dRd_{\mathbb{R}} on R\mathbb{R} is the one fixed in The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background (i).

We work also in the setting of Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background, used here with the Hilbert triple (H,V,A)(H,V,A) taken to be the one of The Square-Integrable and Sobolev Spaces of the Torus Form a Hilbert Triple (i), that is, with H=L2(Tn)H=L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), with V=H1(Tn)V=H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) carrying ⟨ ⋅ ,⋅ ⟩H1\langle\,\cdot\,,\cdot\,\rangle_{H^{1}}, and with AA the form operator determined by these data; its standing hypothesis Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background (ii) holds for this triple by that clause. Accordingly ⟨ ⋅ ,⋅ ⟩H\langle\,\cdot\,,\cdot\,\rangle_{H} is ⟨ ⋅ ,⋅ ⟩L2\langle\,\cdot\,,\cdot\,\rangle_{L^{2}} and ∣⋅∣H|\cdot|_{H} is ∥ ⋅ ∥L2\lVert\,\cdot\,\rVert_{L^{2}}, ∣⋅∣V|\cdot|_{V} is ∥ ⋅ ∥H1\lVert\,\cdot\,\rVert_{H^{1}}, and D(A)⊆H1(Tn)D(A)\subseteq H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) is the domain of the form operator, as fixed in Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background (iii). The set L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) is open in itself by Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background (v), so that the trace of D(A)D(A) on it is D(A)D(A) itself; and Sym(H1(Tn))\mathrm{Sym}(H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n})) denotes the set of bounded symmetric bilinear forms on H1(Tn)H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) fixed in Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background (vi).

Let b,κ,λ0,Cg∈Rb,\kappa,\lambda_{0},C_{g}\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0≤b0\le b, 0<λ00<\lambda_{0} and 0≤Cg0\le C_{g}, let ωg\omega_{g} be a modulus of continuity, and let g:H1(Tn)→Rg:H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n})\to\mathbb{R} satisfy

∣g(X)∣≤Cgfor every X∈H1(Tn),∣g(X)−g(Y)∣≤ωg(∥X−Y∥H1)for all X,Y∈H1(Tn).|g(X)|\le C_{g}\quad\text{for every }X\in H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}),\qquad |g(X)-g(Y)|\le\omega_{g}\bigl(\lVert X-Y\rVert_{H^{1}}\bigr)\quad\text{for all }X,Y\in H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}).

Let B:H1(Tn)→L2(Tn)B:H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n})\to L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) be the cube map fixed there for this bb, whose value at XX is B(X)=b [x3]B(X)=b\,[x^{3}] for xx any representative of XX, and let L:L2(Tn)→L2(Tn)L:L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n})\to L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) be the map whose value at XX is L(X)=−κXL(X)=-\kappa X. Then the following hold.

1. (The data) BB is a monotone nonlinearity for (H,V,A)(H,V,A) by The Cube Map is a Monotone Nonlinearity on the Sobolev Hilbert Triple of the Torus (v), and LL is Lipschitz with constant ∣κ∣|\kappa| from (L2(Tn),dL2)(L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}),d_{L^{2}}) to itself, the number ∣κ∣|\kappa| being nonnegative. Consequently the function FF on D(A)×R×L2(Tn)×Sym(H1(Tn))D(A)\times\mathbb{R}\times L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n})\times\mathrm{Sym}(H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n})) whose value at (X,r,p,Y)(X,r,p,Y) is

F(X,r,p,Y)=λ0 r+12(∥p∥L2)2+⟨AX+B(X)+L(X), p⟩L2−g(X)F(X,r,p,Y)=\lambda_{0}\,r+\tfrac{1}{2}\bigl(\lVert p\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2}+\bigl\langle AX+B(X)+L(X),\,p\bigr\rangle_{L^{2}}-g(X)

is defined, and the hypotheses of Well-Posedness for a Hamilton-Jacobi Equation with a Monotone Nonlinearity on a Hilbert Triple are satisfied by the present data, with ℓ=∣κ∣\ell=|\kappa| there.

2. (Well-posedness) There is a function u:L2(Tn)→Ru:L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n})\to\mathbb{R} that is a viscosity solution of FF on L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), satisfies

∣u(X)∣≤Cgλ0for every X∈L2(Tn),|u(X)|\le\frac{C_{g}}{\lambda_{0}}\qquad\text{for every }X\in L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}),

and is uniformly continuous on L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) with respect to dL2d_{L^{2}} and the metric of Real Hilbert Spaces: Standing Notation and Background (i); the quotient above is the quotient of CgC_{g} by the nonzero λ0\lambda_{0}, and is nonnegative. Moreover, if u′u' is a viscosity solution of FF on L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) that is continuous on L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and for which some C′′∈RC''\in\mathbb{R} satisfies ∣u′(X)∣≤C′′|u'(X)|\le C'' for every X∈L2(Tn)X\in L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), then u′(X)=u(X)u'(X)=u(X) for every X∈L2(Tn)X\in L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}).

3. (The drift on twice continuously differentiable periodic functions) Let v∈Cper2v\in C^{2}_{\mathrm{per}} and set X=[v∣Q]X=[v|_{Q}]. Then X∈D(A)X\in D(A), the map −Δv+b v3−(κ−1) v-\Delta v+b\,v^{3}-(\kappa-1)\,v lies in CperC_{\mathrm{per}} and its restriction to QQ lies in L2(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), and

AX+B(X)+L(X)=[(−Δv+b v3−(κ−1) v)∣Q].AX+B(X)+L(X)=\bigl[\bigl(-\Delta v+b\,v^{3}-(\kappa-1)\,v\bigr)\big|_{Q}\bigr].

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…