Adopt the setting and notation of Pathwise Reduction of the Symmetrised Move Information on the Synthetic Copy: Removed-Clock Likelihoods, the Shifted Family, and the Averaging Bound (and hence of The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record and The Record-Driven Causal Intensity of the Open-Loop Aggregate Solution: Joint Measurability of the Record-Frozen Control, the Regularised Recursion Path, Non-Anticipation, and Measurability of the Likelihood ): the driving variables U i c , j U^{c,j}_i U i c , j on ( Ω , F , P ) (\Omega,\mathcal{F},P) ( Ω , F , P ) , the event Ω 0 U \Omega^{U}_0 Ω 0 U , the cells I c , j I_{c,j} I c , j of lengths μ c , j \mu_{c,j} μ c , j indexed by L \mathsf{L} L (d d d elements), the cell-count vector K \mathsf{K} K , the copy clocks P ♯ \mathsf{P}^{\sharp} P ♯ with P ♯ ( ω ) = P ( K ( ω ) ) ( ω ) \mathsf{P}^{\sharp}(\omega)=\mathsf{P}^{(\mathsf{K}(\omega))}(\omega) P ♯ ( ω ) = P ( K ( ω )) ( ω ) , the regularised paths Σ ˉ ♯ , r ( ω ) \bar\Sigma^{\sharp,r}(\omega) Σ ˉ ♯ , r ( ω ) and Σ ˉ ( y ) , r ( ω ) \bar\Sigma^{(y),r}(\omega) Σ ˉ ( y ) , r ( ω ) with their left limits, the intensities λ ♯ , ω = ( λ ♯ , ω , υ ) υ \lambda^{\sharp,\omega}=(\lambda^{\sharp,\omega,\upsilon})_\upsilon λ ♯ , ω = ( λ ♯ , ω , υ ) υ and λ ( y ) , ω \lambda^{(y),\omega} λ ( y ) , ω , the conflict-free sets G ♯ \mathsf{G}^{\sharp} G ♯ and G ( y ) \mathsf{G}^{(y)} G ( y ) , the likelihoods ℓ ♯ , ω \ell^{\sharp,\omega} ℓ ♯ , ω and ℓ − ( c , j ) , ω \ell^{-(c,j),\omega} ℓ − ( c , j ) , ω , the move size m \mathsf{m} m , the removal ratios ϱ c , j \varrho_{c,j} ϱ c , j , the observation record space ( R , R , ρ ) (\mathbf{R},\mathcal{R},\rho) ( R , R , ρ ) with horizon T T T and channel set V = { 1 , … , l ~ } V=\{1,\dots,\tilde{l}\} V = { 1 , … , l ~ } , and the remaining data N N N , l l l , m m m , B B B , B ~ \tilde{B} B ~ , β \beta β , β ~ \tilde\beta β ~ , x 0 x_0 x 0 , G N \mathbb{G}_N G N , the real number R ≥ N B T R\ge NBT R ≥ NBT , and the policy h h h with values in A \mathcal{A} A with its record-frozen control paths a r a^r a r . Causal intensities and their likelihoods ℓ λ \ell_\lambda ℓ λ are as in those definitions, and conflict-free data are those of Existence, Uniqueness, Causality, and Measurability of the Open-Loop Aggregate Solution . Let L \mathcal{L} L be the set of transition labels , ∣ ⋅ ∣ |\cdot| ∣ ⋅ ∣ the Euclidean norm on R l \mathbb{R}^l R l , and Δ l \Delta^l Δ l the probability simplex . Assume in addition:
(OC) there is a real number b ‾ > 0 \underline{b}>0 b > 0 with b ~ υ ( Σ ) ≥ b ‾ \tilde{b}^\upsilon(\Sigma)\ge\underline{b} b ~ υ ( Σ ) ≥ b for all Σ ∈ Δ l \Sigma\in\Delta^l Σ ∈ Δ l and all υ ∈ V \upsilon\in V υ ∈ V , where b ~ \tilde{b} b ~ is the aggregate observation drift of β ~ \tilde\beta β ~ ;
(X) ( U ~ , β ~ ˉ ) (\tilde{U},\bar{\tilde\beta}) ( U ~ , β ~ ˉ ) is a twice continuously differentiable extension of β ~ \tilde\beta β ~ with derivative bound K ~ \tilde{K} K ~ , and ( U , W β , β ˉ ) (U,W_\beta,\bar\beta) ( U , W β , β ˉ ) is a twice continuously differentiable extension of β \beta β with derivative bound K K K (its second component is the set called V V V in that definition, renamed here to avoid the channel set V V V ); put Λ 1 = l + m ( B + K ) \Lambda_1=\sqrt{l+m}\,(B+K) Λ 1 = l + m ( B + K ) as in Shared-Clock Point Insertion into the Open-Loop Aggregate Solution: Exact Response Identity, Crude Bound, and Linearisation Defect and Γ = l ( B ~ + K ~ ) \Gamma=\sqrt{l}\,(\tilde{B}+\tilde{K}) Γ = l ( B ~ + K ~ ) , the Lipschitz constant of each b ~ υ \tilde{b}^\upsilon b ~ υ on Δ l \Delta^l Δ l given by claims (i) and (ii) of Regularity and Derivative Bounds of the Extended Aggregate Observation Drift (with b ~ ˉ \bar{\tilde{b}} b ~ ˉ the extended aggregate observation drift of ( U ~ , β ~ ˉ ) (\tilde{U},\bar{\tilde\beta}) ( U ~ , β ~ ˉ ) , which agrees with b ~ \tilde{b} b ~ on Δ l \Delta^l Δ l );
(W) L ≥ 0 L\ge0 L ≥ 0 and D ≥ 0 D\ge0 D ≥ 0 are real numbers with Λ 1 T A 0 < L \Lambda_1TA_0<L Λ 1 T A 0 < L , where
A 0 = 2 ( m + l ( l − 1 ) ( D + m ) ) exp ( 2 l ( l − 1 ) Λ 1 T ) , A_0=\sqrt{2}\,\bigl(\mathsf{m}+l(l-1)(D+\mathsf{m})\bigr)\exp\bigl(\sqrt{2}\,l(l-1)\Lambda_1T\bigr), A 0 = 2 ( m + l ( l − 1 ) ( D + m ) ) exp ( 2 l ( l − 1 ) Λ 1 T ) ,
the constant of Shared-Clock Point Insertion into the Open-Loop Aggregate Solution: Exact Response Identity, Crude Bound, and Linearisation Defect for the move size m \mathsf{m} m and the discrepancy tolerance D + m D+\mathsf{m} D + m .
The clock-good event. Let G L , D G_{L,D} G L , D be the set of ω ∈ Ω 0 U \omega\in\Omega^{U}_0 ω ∈ Ω 0 U such that for every label c ∈ L c\in\mathcal{L} c ∈ L and all real 0 ≤ u ≤ u ′ ≤ R 0\le u\le u'\le R 0 ≤ u ≤ u ′ ≤ R with u ′ − u ≤ L u'-u\le L u ′ − u ≤ L ,
∣ P u ′ ♯ , c ( ω ) − P u ♯ , c ( ω ) − ( u ′ − u ) ∣ ≤ D . \bigl|\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_{u'}(\omega)-\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_{u}(\omega)-(u'-u)\bigr|\le D . P u ′ ♯ , c ( ω ) − P u ♯ , c ( ω ) − ( u ′ − u ) ≤ D .
The tracked records. For ω ∈ Ω \omega\in\Omega ω ∈ Ω let T ω \mathsf{T}_\omega T ω be the set of r ∈ R r\in\mathbf{R} r ∈ R with ( r , ω ) ∈ G ♯ (r,\omega)\in\mathsf{G}^{\sharp} ( r , ω ) ∈ G ♯ and ( r , ω ) ∈ G ( K ( ω ) − m e c , j ) (r,\omega)\in\mathsf{G}^{(\mathsf{K}(\omega)-\mathsf{m}e_{c,j})} ( r , ω ) ∈ G ( K ( ω ) − m e c , j ) for every ( c , j ) ∈ L (c,j)\in\mathsf{L} ( c , j ) ∈ L with K c , j ( ω ) ≥ m \mathsf{K}_{c,j}(\omega)\ge\mathsf{m} K c , j ( ω ) ≥ m .
The effective removed intensities. For ω ∈ Ω \omega\in\Omega ω ∈ Ω and ( c , j ) ∈ L (c,j)\in\mathsf{L} ( c , j ) ∈ L put λ − ( c , j ) , ω = λ ( K ( ω ) − m e c , j ) , ω \lambda^{-(c,j),\omega}=\lambda^{(\mathsf{K}(\omega)-\mathsf{m}e_{c,j}),\omega} λ − ( c , j ) , ω = λ ( K ( ω ) − m e c , j ) , ω if K c , j ( ω ) ≥ m \mathsf{K}_{c,j}(\omega)\ge\mathsf{m} K c , j ( ω ) ≥ m and λ − ( c , j ) , ω = λ ♯ , ω \lambda^{-(c,j),\omega}=\lambda^{\sharp,\omega} λ − ( c , j ) , ω = λ ♯ , ω otherwise; and let E ( c , j ) ( c ′ , j ′ ) ω E^{\omega}_{(c,j)(c',j')} E ( c , j ) ( c ′ , j ′ ) ω , C ( c , j ) ( c ′ , j ′ ) ω C^{\omega}_{(c,j)(c',j')} C ( c , j ) ( c ′ , j ′ ) ω and V a r ( c , j ) ω \mathrm{Var}^{\omega}_{(c,j)} Var ( c , j ) ω be the pair exponents, pair covariances and ratio variances of Pair Expansion of the Weighted Likelihood-Ratio Square: Pair Covariances of Causal-Intensity Likelihoods, the Exact Expansion, and Its First-Order Form for the base intensity λ ♯ , ω \lambda^{\sharp,\omega} λ ♯ , ω and the perturbed intensities ( λ − ( c , j ) , ω ) ( c , j ) ∈ L (\lambda^{-(c,j),\omega})_{(c,j)\in\mathsf{L}} ( λ − ( c , j ) , ω ) ( c , j ) ∈ L (n = d n=d n = d , indexed by L \mathsf{L} L ).
1. (Admissibility) For every ω \omega ω : T ω ∈ R \mathsf{T}_\omega\in\mathcal{R} T ω ∈ R and G L , D ∈ F G_{L,D}\in\mathcal{F} G L , D ∈ F ; λ ♯ , ω \lambda^{\sharp,\omega} λ ♯ , ω is a causal intensity with bound N B ~ N\tilde{B} N B ~ and λ ♯ , ω , υ ≥ N b ‾ \lambda^{\sharp,\omega,\upsilon}\ge N\underline{b} λ ♯ , ω , υ ≥ N b everywhere; each λ − ( c , j ) , ω \lambda^{-(c,j),\omega} λ − ( c , j ) , ω is a causal intensity with bound N B ~ N\tilde{B} N B ~ ; and ϱ c , j ( K c , j ( ω ) ) ℓ − ( c , j ) , ω = ϱ c , j ( K c , j ( ω ) ) ℓ λ − ( c , j ) , ω \varrho_{c,j}(\mathsf{K}_{c,j}(\omega))\,\ell^{-(c,j),\omega}=\varrho_{c,j}(\mathsf{K}_{c,j}(\omega))\,\ell_{\lambda^{-(c,j),\omega}} ϱ c , j ( K c , j ( ω )) ℓ − ( c , j ) , ω = ϱ c , j ( K c , j ( ω )) ℓ λ − ( c , j ) , ω on R \mathbf{R} R . Hence Pair Expansion of the Weighted Likelihood-Ratio Square: Pair Covariances of Causal-Intensity Likelihoods, the Exact Expansion, and Its First-Order Form applies to λ ♯ , ω \lambda^{\sharp,\omega} λ ♯ , ω and ( λ − ( c , j ) , ω ) ( c , j ) (\lambda^{-(c,j),\omega})_{(c,j)} ( λ − ( c , j ) , ω ) ( c , j ) with any weights and with the ratio factors ϱ c , j ( K c , j ( ω ) ) \varrho_{c,j}(\mathsf{K}_{c,j}(\omega)) ϱ c , j ( K c , j ( ω )) , and Good-Bad Splitting of the Integrated Symmetrised Score Functional: Chebyshev Bound for the Under-Likelihood Set, Transfer of Mass Between Densities, and the Split Bound applies on ( R , R , ρ ) (\mathbf{R},\mathcal{R},\rho) ( R , R , ρ ) to ℓ = ℓ ♯ , ω \ell=\ell^{\sharp,\omega} ℓ = ℓ ♯ , ω , ℓ ( c , j ) = ℓ λ − ( c , j ) , ω \ell_{(c,j)}=\ell_{\lambda^{-(c,j),\omega}} ℓ ( c , j ) = ℓ λ − ( c , j ) , ω and the same ratio factors, its integrand Φ w ( ℓ , ( r q ℓ q ) q ) \Phi_w(\ell,(\mathsf{r}_q\ell_q)_q) Φ w ( ℓ , ( r q ℓ q ) q ) being the pathwise score map Ψ ( ⋅ , ω ) \Psi(\cdot,\omega) Ψ ( ⋅ , ω ) of Pathwise Reduction of the Symmetrised Move Information on the Synthetic Copy: Removed-Clock Likelihoods, the Shifted Family, and the Averaging Bound .
2. (Response bound on the clock-good event) Let ω ∈ G L , D \omega\in G_{L,D} ω ∈ G L , D , ( c , j ) ∈ L (c,j)\in\mathsf{L} ( c , j ) ∈ L with K c , j ( ω ) ≥ m \mathsf{K}_{c,j}(\omega)\ge\mathsf{m} K c , j ( ω ) ≥ m , and r ∈ T ω r\in\mathsf{T}_\omega r ∈ T ω ; put y = K ( ω ) − m e c , j y=\mathsf{K}(\omega)-\mathsf{m}e_{c,j} y = K ( ω ) − m e c , j . Then for every t ∈ [ 0 , T ] t\in[0,T] t ∈ [ 0 , T ]
∣ Σ ˉ t ♯ , r ( ω ) − Σ ˉ t ( y ) , r ( ω ) ∣ ≤ A 0 N , ∣ Σ ˉ t − ♯ , r ( ω ) − Σ ˉ t − ( y ) , r ( ω ) ∣ ≤ A 0 N , \bigl|\bar\Sigma^{\sharp,r}_t(\omega)-\bar\Sigma^{(y),r}_t(\omega)\bigr|\le\frac{A_0}{N},\qquad \bigl|\bar\Sigma^{\sharp,r}_{t-}(\omega)-\bar\Sigma^{(y),r}_{t-}(\omega)\bigr|\le\frac{A_0}{N}, Σ ˉ t ♯ , r ( ω ) − Σ ˉ t ( y ) , r ( ω ) ≤ N A 0 , Σ ˉ t − ♯ , r ( ω ) − Σ ˉ t − ( y ) , r ( ω ) ≤ N A 0 ,
and consequently ∣ λ t − ( c , j ) , ω , υ ( r ) − λ t ♯ , ω , υ ( r ) ∣ ≤ Γ A 0 |\lambda^{-(c,j),\omega,\upsilon}_t(r)-\lambda^{\sharp,\omega,\upsilon}_t(r)|\le\Gamma A_0 ∣ λ t − ( c , j ) , ω , υ ( r ) − λ t ♯ , ω , υ ( r ) ∣ ≤ Γ A 0 for every υ ∈ V \upsilon\in V υ ∈ V and t ∈ [ 0 , T ] t\in[0,T] t ∈ [ 0 , T ] . (For ( c , j ) (c,j) ( c , j ) with K c , j ( ω ) < m \mathsf{K}_{c,j}(\omega)<\mathsf{m} K c , j ( ω ) < m the two intensities coincide.)
3. (Uniform pair-exponent bound) Put
E ˉ N = l ~ T Γ 2 A 0 2 N b ‾ . \bar{E}_N=\frac{\tilde{l}\,T\,\Gamma^{2}A_0^{2}}{N\,\underline{b}} . E ˉ N = N b l ~ T Γ 2 A 0 2 .
For every ω ∈ G L , D \omega\in G_{L,D} ω ∈ G L , D , all ( c , j ) , ( c ′ , j ′ ) ∈ L (c,j),(c',j')\in\mathsf{L} ( c , j ) , ( c ′ , j ′ ) ∈ L and every r ∈ T ω r\in\mathsf{T}_\omega r ∈ T ω , ∣ E ( c , j ) ( c ′ , j ′ ) ω ( r ) ∣ ≤ E ˉ N |E^{\omega}_{(c,j)(c',j')}(r)|\le\bar{E}_N ∣ E ( c , j ) ( c ′ , j ′ ) ω ( r ) ∣ ≤ E ˉ N .
4. (Bounds on the pair covariances) Let ω ∈ G L , D \omega\in G_{L,D} ω ∈ G L , D be such that ρ ( R ∖ T ω ) = 0 \rho(\mathbf{R}\setminus\mathsf{T}_\omega)=0 ρ ( R ∖ T ω ) = 0 . Then for all ( c , j ) , ( c ′ , j ′ ) ∈ L (c,j),(c',j')\in\mathsf{L} ( c , j ) , ( c ′ , j ′ ) ∈ L ,
∣ C ( c , j ) ( c ′ , j ′ ) ω ∣ ≤ exp ( E ˉ N ) − 1 , 0 ≤ V a r ( c , j ) ω ≤ exp ( E ˉ N ) − 1 , ∣ C ( c , j ) ( c ′ , j ′ ) ω − ∫ R ℓ μ ~ ( c , j ) ( c ′ , j ′ ) ω E ( c , j ) ( c ′ , j ′ ) ω d ρ ∣ ≤ 1 2 E ˉ N 2 exp ( E ˉ N ) , |C^{\omega}_{(c,j)(c',j')}|\le\exp(\bar{E}_N)-1,\qquad 0\le\mathrm{Var}^{\omega}_{(c,j)}\le\exp(\bar{E}_N)-1,\qquad \Bigl|C^{\omega}_{(c,j)(c',j')}-\int_{\mathbf{R}}\ell_{\tilde\mu^{\omega}_{(c,j)(c',j')}}E^{\omega}_{(c,j)(c',j')}\,d\rho\Bigr|\le\tfrac12\bar{E}_N^{2}\exp(\bar{E}_N), ∣ C ( c , j ) ( c ′ , j ′ ) ω ∣ ≤ exp ( E ˉ N ) − 1 , 0 ≤ Var ( c , j ) ω ≤ exp ( E ˉ N ) − 1 , C ( c , j ) ( c ′ , j ′ ) ω − ∫ R ℓ μ ~ ( c , j ) ( c ′ , j ′ ) ω E ( c , j ) ( c ′ , j ′ ) ω d ρ ≤ 2 1 E ˉ N 2 exp ( E ˉ N ) ,
where μ ~ ( c , j ) ( c ′ , j ′ ) ω \tilde\mu^{\omega}_{(c,j)(c',j')} μ ~ ( c , j ) ( c ′ , j ′ ) ω is the pair intensity of Pair Expansion of the Weighted Likelihood-Ratio Square: Pair Covariances of Causal-Intensity Likelihoods, the Exact Expansion, and Its First-Order Form .