TheoremBase

The Coupling Test Function of a Bounded Plan: Maximising Couplings, Continuity, Plan Subjets and Localisation

For a bounded plan at a bounded law, the coupling test function built from a differentiable gauge with vanishing derivative at zero and a quadratic weight is attained by a maximising coupling, is Wasserstein-continuous on bounded laws, and admits an explicit plan subjet read off from a maximising coupling; when small displacements pay little momentum it vanishes at the base law, and along laws converging to the base law the maximising couplings collapse and the subjet momenta converge to the plan momenta.

Statement

In the setting of Plan Jets and Hamiltonians on Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws: Standing Notation, let r>0r>0 be real, let Σd,r\Sigma_{d,r} be the set of laws with norm bound rr of Noncommutative Laws, Couplings and the Wasserstein Distance: Standing Notation §laws, let κd\kappa_{d} and κ2d\kappa_{2d} be the canonical maps of Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws: Standing Notation §laws, and let (Σd,r,W2)(\Sigma_{d,r},W_{2}) be the metric space of The Noncommutative Laws with a Norm Bound Form a Complete Bounded Metric Space with Interpolation Points. Let μ∈Σd,r\mu\in\Sigma_{d,r}, let π\pi be a bounded plan at μ\mu with momentum norm ∣π∣mom|\pi|_{\mathrm{mom}}, and let θ>0\theta>0 and L≥0L\ge0 be real. Let h:[0,∞)→[0,∞)h:[0,\infty)\to[0,\infty) be nondecreasing with h(0)=0h(0)=0, and suppose that for every real s≥0s\ge0 there is a real number h′(s)h'(s) with ∣h′(s)∣≤L|h'(s)|\le L such that for every real η>0\eta>0 there is a real rη>0r_{\eta}>0 with

∣h(t)−h(s)−h′(s)(t−s)∣≤η ∣t−s∣for every real t≥0 with ∣t−s∣<rη,\bigl|h(t)-h(s)-h'(s)(t-s)\bigr|\le\eta\,|t-s|\qquad\text{for every real }t\ge0\text{ with }|t-s|<r_{\eta},

that h′(0)=0h'(0)=0, and that h′(s)→0h'(s)\to0 as s→0s\to0: for every real η>0\eta>0 there is a real rh>0r_{h}>0 with ∣h′(s)∣<η|h'(s)|<\eta whenever 0≤s<rh0\le s<r_{h}. Write Φ=Φκ2d(π)h,θ:Σd2→R\Phi=\Phi^{h,\theta}_{\kappa_{2d}(\pi)}:\Sigma^{2}_{d}\to\mathbb{R} for the coupling test function of κ2d(π)\kappa_{2d}(\pi) with gauge hh and weight θ\theta, and, for λ∈Σd2\lambda\in\Sigma^{2}_{d}, C(λ)=Cκ2d(π)(λ)\mathcal{C}(\lambda)=\mathcal{C}_{\kappa_{2d}(\pi)}(\lambda) for the set of couplings of the plan κ2d(π)\kappa_{2d}(\pi) with λ\lambda, with the displacement and momentum pairing s(γ)s(\gamma) and p(γ)p(\gamma) of γ∈C(λ)\gamma\in\mathcal{C}(\lambda). For ν∈Σd,r\nu\in\Sigma_{d,r}, a maximising coupling for ν\nu is a γ∈C(κd(ν))\gamma\in\mathcal{C}(\kappa_{d}(\nu)) with Φ(κd(ν))=p(γ)−h(s(γ))−θ s(γ)2\Phi(\kappa_{d}(\nu))=p(\gamma)-h(s(\gamma))-\theta\,s(\gamma)^{2}.

1. (Maximising couplings) For every ν∈Σd,r\nu\in\Sigma_{d,r} there is a maximising coupling for ν\nu.

2. (Continuity) The function ν↦Φ(κd(ν))\nu\mapsto\Phi(\kappa_{d}(\nu)) on Σd,r\Sigma_{d,r} is continuous from (Σd,r,W2)(\Sigma_{d,r},W_{2}) to R\mathbb{R} with the metric of Plan Jets and Hamiltonians on Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws: Standing Notation §metrics.

3. (Plan subjets) Let ν∈Σd,r\nu\in\Sigma_{d,r}, let γ\gamma be a maximising coupling for ν\nu, and let X,P,X′X,P,X' be L2L^{2} dd-tuples of a tracial W*-probability space (H,M,Ω)(H,M,\Omega) with law(X,P,X′)=γ\mathrm{law}(X,P,X')=\gamma, laws, differences and the L2L^{2} norm being those of Tracial W*-Probability Spaces and Square-Integrable Tuples: Standing Notation §tuples and sums and real multiples those of Plan Jets and Hamiltonians on Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws: Standing Notation §pairing. Put a=X′−Xa=X'-X and s=∥a∥2s=\lVert a\rVert_{2}, so that s=s(γ)s=s(\gamma), and let S=P−(h′(s)s+2θ)aS=P-\bigl(\tfrac{h'(s)}{s}+2\theta\bigr)a if s>0s>0 and S=PS=P if s=0s=0. Then law(X′,S)∈J−Φ(κd(ν))\mathrm{law}(X',S)\in J^{-}\Phi(\kappa_{d}(\nu)), the plan subjet of Φ\Phi at κd(ν)\kappa_{d}(\nu) with slack 00, and ∥S−P∥2≤h′(s)+2θs\lVert S-P\rVert_{2}\le h'(s)+2\theta s.

4. (Localisation) Let r0>0r_{0}>0 be real with θr0≥2∣π∣mom\theta r_{0}\ge2|\pi|_{\mathrm{mom}}, and suppose that p(γ)≤12h(s(γ))p(\gamma)\le\frac{1}{2}h(s(\gamma)) for every γ∈C(κd(μ))\gamma\in\mathcal{C}(\kappa_{d}(\mu)) with s(γ)<r0s(\gamma)<r_{0}. Then Φ(κd(μ))=0\Phi(\kappa_{d}(\mu))=0.

5. (Convergence) Let r0>0r_{0}>0 be real with θr0≥2∣π∣mom\theta r_{0}\ge2|\pi|_{\mathrm{mom}}, suppose that p(γ)≤12h(s(γ))p(\gamma)\le\frac{1}{2}h(s(\gamma)) for every γ∈C(κd(μ))\gamma\in\mathcal{C}(\kappa_{d}(\mu)) with s(γ)<r0s(\gamma)<r_{0}, let (νn)n∈N(\nu_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} be a sequence in Σd,r\Sigma_{d,r} such that the real sequence (W2(νn,μ))n∈N(W_{2}(\nu_{n},\mu))_{n\in\mathbb{N}} converges to 00, and for every n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} let γn\gamma_{n} be a maximising coupling for νn\nu_{n}. Then the real sequences (s(γn))n∈N(s(\gamma_{n}))_{n\in\mathbb{N}} and (Φ(κd(νn)))n∈N(\Phi(\kappa_{d}(\nu_{n})))_{n\in\mathbb{N}} converge to 00. Moreover, if for every n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, (Xn,Pn,Xn′)(X_{n},P_{n},X'_{n}) is a triple of L2L^{2} dd-tuples of a tracial W*-probability space (Hn,Mn,Ωn)(H_{n},M_{n},\Omega_{n}) with law(Xn,Pn,Xn′)=γn\mathrm{law}(X_{n},P_{n},X'_{n})=\gamma_{n} and SnS_{n} is defined from Xn,Pn,Xn′X_{n},P_{n},X'_{n} and s(γn)=∥Xn′−Xn∥2s(\gamma_{n})=\lVert X'_{n}-X_{n}\rVert_{2} as SS is defined from X,P,X′X,P,X' and ss in clause 3, then the real sequence (∥Sn−Pn∥2)n∈N(\lVert S_{n}-P_{n}\rVert_{2})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} converges to 00.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…