Let K be a field. Let N be the set of natural numbers with successor map S as in that definition, ordered by the relation ≤ of that definition, let n∈N, and let [n] be the initial segment determined by n, that is, the set of natural numbers k with k≤n; every such k also satisfies 1≤k by claim 4 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers, so [n] is the set of natural numbers k with 1≤k≤n. Let a:[n]→K and b:[n]→K be maps, with values written ak and bk, and let λ∈K. All sums below are the finite sums of that definition.
Two different order relations occur below. In index ranges such as 1≤k≤n the symbol ≤ is the order on N just cited; in claims 5 and 6 it is the order of the ordered field of real numbers. Then the following hold.
1. (Restriction and recursion) If j∈[n] and a′ denotes the restriction of a to [j], then
k=1∑iak′=k=1∑iakfor every i∈[j],
so the value of a finite sum does not depend on which family extending the summands is used to form it. Moreover
k=1∑1ak=a1,k=1∑S(m)ak=(k=1∑mak)+aS(m)whenever S(m)∈[n].
2. (Additivity)
k=1∑n(ak+bk)=k=1∑nak+k=1∑nbk.
3. (Homogeneity)
k=1∑n(λak)=λk=1∑nak.
4. (Conjugation) If K is the field of complex numbers, then, with the complex conjugate,
k=1∑nak=k=1∑nak.
5. (Nonnegative summands) If K is the field of real numbers, with the order ≤ of its ordered field structure, and 0≤ak for every k∈[n], then
0≤k=1∑nak;
and if in addition ∑k=1nak=0, then ak=0 for every k∈[n].
6. (Each summand is at most the sum) Under the hypotheses of claim 5,
aj≤k=1∑nakfor every j∈[n].
7. (A single possibly nonzero summand) Let i∈[n] and suppose that ak=0 for every k∈[n] with k=i. Then
k=1∑nak=ai.