Reason: Stopped analogue of the weighted second-moment evolution of the state fluctuation process, in both the running-weight and fully stopped forms; the fully stopped form is what the lower-bound reduction consumes. No moment hypothesis on the control. Internally reviewed twice; validated strict.
Additionally, let τ be a stopping time of (Ftsys)t∈[0,T]. Write 1A for the function equal to 1 on A and 0 off A; for s∈[0,T], 1{s<τ} denotes the value at time s of the pre-stopping-time indicator of τ, the function equal to 1 on {ω∈Ω:s<τ(ω)} and 0 off it. For t∈[0,T], min(t,τ) denotes the function ω↦min(t,τ(ω)), and the sampled function at min(t,τ) is applied componentwise: smin(t,τ) is the Rl-valued function on Ω with components smin(t,τ)γ(ω)=smin(t,τ(ω))γ(ω), and Zmin(t,τ) is the matrix-valued function on Ω with entries Zmin(t,τ)γδ(ω)=Zmin(t,τ(ω))γδ. Then:
(a) (Well-definedness.) For every t∈[0,T] and all γ,δ∈{1,…,l}, the functions 1Ω0smin(t,τ)γ, 1Ω0smin(t,τ)⋅Ztsmin(t,τ), and 1Ω0smin(t,τ)⋅Zmin(t,τ)smin(t,τ) are bounded random variables; the expectation E[s0⋅Z0s0] is finite, the random variable being bounded (∣s0∣≤2N everywhere and Z0 a fixed matrix); the expectations
are finite for every s∈[0,T], and as functions of s they are bounded and measurable on [0,T] with the trace Borel σ-algebra, so the Lebesgue integrals below exist — the first summand of the integrand of part (c) being, by linearity, the sum of the second of these expectations and twice the third.
(b) (Stopped evolution, running weight.) For every t∈[0,T],
Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.