TheoremBase

Stopped Weighted Second-Moment Evolution of the State Fluctuation Process

Statement

Adopt the setting of the weighted second-moment evolution lemma for the state fluctuation process: the fluctuation processes of the controlled NN-agent dynamics — a transition-rate family β\beta on ll states with control set A\mathcal{A}, a nonempty subset of Euclidean space Rm\mathbb{R}^m, and rate bound BB, an observation-rate family β~\tilde{\beta}, a horizon T>0T>0, an NN-agent driving system (Ω,F,P)(\Omega,\mathcal{F},P), an observation-driven control policy hh which is A\mathcal{A}-valued, a solution on [0,T][0,T] with regular event Ω0\Omega_0, empirical state measure Σt\Sigma_t, control αt\alpha_t, and system filtration (Ftsys)t∈[0,T](\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_t)_{t\in[0,T]}, a mean-field trajectory pair (S,A)(S,A) for β\beta with horizon TT, and the state fluctuation process st=N(Σt−St)\mathfrak{s}_t=\sqrt{N}(\Sigma_t-S_t) — together with the aggregate state drift bb and the aggregate fluctuation covariance Θ\Theta of β\beta, the drift difference gs=N (b(Σs,αs)−b(Ss,As))∈Rlg_s=\sqrt{N}\,(b(\Sigma_s,\alpha_s)-b(S_s,A_s))\in\mathbb{R}^l, and the weight family Z=(Zt)t∈[0,T]Z=(Z_t)_{t\in[0,T]} of symmetric real l×ll\times l matrices, continuously differentiable in integral form with derivative matrices z˙(s)\dot{z}(s), exactly as specified there, with the pairing notation x⋅My=∑γ,δ=1lMγδxγyδx\cdot My=\sum_{\gamma,\delta=1}^{l}M^{\gamma\delta}x^\gamma y^\delta and with E\mathbb{E} the expectation.

Additionally, let τ\tau be a stopping time of (Ftsys)t∈[0,T](\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_t)_{t\in[0,T]}. Write 1A\mathbf{1}_A for the function equal to 11 on AA and 00 off AA; for s∈[0,T]s\in[0,T], 1{s<τ}\mathbf{1}_{\{s<\tau\}} denotes the value at time ss of the pre-stopping-time indicator of τ\tau, the function equal to 11 on {ω∈Ω:s<τ(ω)}\{\omega\in\Omega:s<\tau(\omega)\} and 00 off it. For t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T], min⁡(t,τ)\min(t,\tau) denotes the function ω↦min⁡(t,τ(ω))\omega\mapsto\min(t,\tau(\omega)), and the sampled function at min⁡(t,τ)\min(t,\tau) is applied componentwise: smin⁡(t,τ)\mathfrak{s}_{\min(t,\tau)} is the Rl\mathbb{R}^l-valued function on Ω\Omega with components smin⁡(t,τ)γ(ω)=smin⁡(t,τ(ω))γ(ω)\mathfrak{s}^\gamma_{\min(t,\tau)}(\omega)=\mathfrak{s}^\gamma_{\min(t,\tau(\omega))}(\omega), and Zmin⁡(t,τ)Z_{\min(t,\tau)} is the matrix-valued function on Ω\Omega with entries Zmin⁡(t,τ)γδ(ω)=Zmin⁡(t,τ(ω))γδZ^{\gamma\delta}_{\min(t,\tau)}(\omega)=Z^{\gamma\delta}_{\min(t,\tau(\omega))}. Then:

(a) (Well-definedness.) For every t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T] and all γ,δ∈{1,…,l}\gamma,\delta\in\{1,\dots,l\}, the functions 1Ω0 smin⁡(t,τ)γ\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}\,\mathfrak{s}^\gamma_{\min(t,\tau)}, 1Ω0 smin⁡(t,τ)⋅Zt smin⁡(t,τ)\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}\,\mathfrak{s}_{\min(t,\tau)}\cdot Z_t\,\mathfrak{s}_{\min(t,\tau)}, and 1Ω0 smin⁡(t,τ)⋅Zmin⁡(t,τ) smin⁡(t,τ)\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}\,\mathfrak{s}_{\min(t,\tau)}\cdot Z_{\min(t,\tau)}\,\mathfrak{s}_{\min(t,\tau)} are bounded random variables; the expectation E[s0⋅Z0s0]\mathbb{E}[\mathfrak{s}_0\cdot Z_0\mathfrak{s}_0] is finite, the random variable being bounded (∣s0∣≤2N|\mathfrak{s}_0|\le2\sqrt{N} everywhere and Z0Z_0 a fixed matrix); the expectations

E[1Ω0 smin⁡(s,τ)⋅z˙(s) smin⁡(s,τ)],E[1Ω01{s<τ} ss⋅z˙(s) ss],E[1Ω01{s<τ} ss⋅Zsgs],E[1{s<τ}1Ω0 Θγδ(Σs,αs)]\mathbb{E}\big[\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}\,\mathfrak{s}_{\min(s,\tau)}\cdot\dot{z}(s)\,\mathfrak{s}_{\min(s,\tau)}\big],\qquad \mathbb{E}\big[\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}\mathbf{1}_{\{s<\tau\}}\,\mathfrak{s}_s\cdot\dot{z}(s)\,\mathfrak{s}_s\big],\qquad \mathbb{E}\big[\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}\mathbf{1}_{\{s<\tau\}}\,\mathfrak{s}_s\cdot Z_sg_s\big],\qquad \mathbb{E}\big[\mathbf{1}_{\{s<\tau\}}\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}\,\Theta^{\gamma\delta}(\Sigma_s,\alpha_s)\big]

are finite for every s∈[0,T]s\in[0,T], and as functions of ss they are bounded and measurable on [0,T][0,T] with the trace Borel σ\sigma-algebra, so the Lebesgue integrals below exist — the first summand of the integrand of part (c) being, by linearity, the sum of the second of these expectations and twice the third.

(b) (Stopped evolution, running weight.) For every t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T],

E[1Ω0 smin⁡(t,τ)⋅Zt smin⁡(t,τ)]=E[s0⋅Z0s0]+∫[0,t](E[1Ω0 smin⁡(s,τ)⋅z˙(s) smin⁡(s,τ)]+2 E[1Ω01{s<τ} ss⋅Zsgs]+∑γ,δ=1lZsγδ E[1{s<τ}1Ω0 Θγδ(Σs,αs)]) ds.\mathbb{E}\big[\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}\,\mathfrak{s}_{\min(t,\tau)}\cdot Z_t\,\mathfrak{s}_{\min(t,\tau)}\big]=\mathbb{E}\big[\mathfrak{s}_0\cdot Z_0\mathfrak{s}_0\big]+\int_{[0,t]}\Big(\mathbb{E}\big[\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}\,\mathfrak{s}_{\min(s,\tau)}\cdot\dot{z}(s)\,\mathfrak{s}_{\min(s,\tau)}\big]+2\,\mathbb{E}\big[\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}\mathbf{1}_{\{s<\tau\}}\,\mathfrak{s}_s\cdot Z_sg_s\big]+\sum_{\gamma,\delta=1}^{l}Z^{\gamma\delta}_s\,\mathbb{E}\big[\mathbf{1}_{\{s<\tau\}}\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}\,\Theta^{\gamma\delta}(\Sigma_s,\alpha_s)\big]\Big)\,ds .

(c) (Fully stopped evolution.) For every t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T],

E[1Ω0 smin⁡(t,τ)⋅Zmin⁡(t,τ) smin⁡(t,τ)]=E[s0⋅Z0s0]+∫[0,t](E[1Ω01{s<τ}(ss⋅z˙(s) ss+2 ss⋅Zsgs)]+∑γ,δ=1lZsγδ E[1{s<τ}1Ω0 Θγδ(Σs,αs)]) ds.\mathbb{E}\big[\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}\,\mathfrak{s}_{\min(t,\tau)}\cdot Z_{\min(t,\tau)}\,\mathfrak{s}_{\min(t,\tau)}\big]=\mathbb{E}\big[\mathfrak{s}_0\cdot Z_0\mathfrak{s}_0\big]+\int_{[0,t]}\Big(\mathbb{E}\big[\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}\mathbf{1}_{\{s<\tau\}}\big(\mathfrak{s}_s\cdot\dot{z}(s)\,\mathfrak{s}_s+2\,\mathfrak{s}_s\cdot Z_sg_s\big)\big]+\sum_{\gamma,\delta=1}^{l}Z^{\gamma\delta}_s\,\mathbb{E}\big[\mathbf{1}_{\{s<\tau\}}\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}\,\Theta^{\gamma\delta}(\Sigma_s,\alpha_s)\big]\Big)\,ds .

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…