Quadratic Growth of the Mean-Field Hamiltonian in the Control along a Stationary Mean-Field Triple
lemmaAnalysisMultivariable Calculuslem:hamiltonian-quadratic-growth-2026aLet , , , with rate bound , with derivative bound , , , with second-derivative bound , , and be as in the definition of a stationary mean-field triple (the open set of the cost extension, written in that definition, is written here, so that is defined on and on ), and let be a stationary co-state for these data. Adopt the coordinate and partial-derivative notation , of the extension definitions: the partial derivatives of orders one and two of each exist and are continuous on by part (i) of the regularity of the extended aggregate state drift, and those of on by clause 2 of the cost extension definition together with clauses 1 and 2 of the definition. Let , for and , be the fluctuation Hessian coefficients of these data. Write for the real numbers, for the Euclidean distance, for the Euclidean norm (Euclidean distance to the origin), and for the probability simplex. Throughout, a real-valued function on a subinterval of the real numbers is called continuous on when it is continuous relative to , both and the codomain carrying the metric of the real line. Fix a real number with for every ; such a number exists because each component of is continuous on by clause 1 of the co-state definition and therefore attains a maximum and a minimum on by the extreme value theorem.
Define the mean-field Hamiltonian along the triple as the function on given by
which is well defined because and ; the script letter is distinct from the Hessian coefficients . Define, for , the real matrix with entries
and write for ; the displayed formula agrees with the definition of in the completion-of-squares theorem, and only that formula and the wording of its hypothesis (H1) are borrowed from that theorem, not its setting.
Hypotheses. (A) The control set is convex and compact for the topology determined by the Euclidean distance. (H1) There is a real number with for every and every (hypothesis (H1) of the completion-of-squares theorem). (U) For every , the point is the unique minimizer of on : for every with .
Then:
(a) (Continuity.) Regarding as a subset of Euclidean space , the map is continuous at every point of , and so is the map ; this uses none of the hypotheses (A), (H1), (U).
(b) (Stationarity and the Hessian in the control.) For every and ,
and for every ,
This uses none of the hypotheses (A), (H1), (U).
(c) (Upper quadratic bound.) Assume that is convex (only the convexity half of (A) is used). Put and . Then for every and every ,
(d) (Quadratic growth.) Assume (A), (H1), and (U). Then there is a real number such that
Loading…
Prerequisites
No prerequisites tracked.
Dependents
No dependents yet.
Dependent proofs
No dependent proofs yet.
No relations recorded yet.