TheoremBase

Lattice Sums along Cubes: Linearity, Nonnegative Families, Absolute Summability, Comparison and Finitely Supported Families

Cube-summable families form a vector space on which the lattice sum is linear; a nonnegative family is cube-summable exactly when its cube sums are bounded, its sum is their supremum and agrees with its series along any enumeration; absolute cube-summability and domination imply cube-summability; finitely supported families are summable.

Statement

Let n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, let Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n} be the integer lattice with its cubes ΓN\Gamma_{N}, and let the cube sums SNS_{N}, cube-summability and the lattice sum ∑k∈Zn\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}} be as defined there. For a family a:Zn→Ra:\mathbb{Z}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} write ∣a∣|a| for the family k↦∣a(k)∣k\mapsto|a(k)|. For a nonempty finite set E⊆ZnE\subseteq\mathbb{Z}^{n}, ∑k∈Ea(k)\sum_{k\in E}a(k) is the sum over the finite index set EE; upper bounds and suprema of sets of real numbers are those of The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §bounds. Let a,b:Zn→Ra,b:\mathbb{Z}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} and λ∈R\lambda\in\mathbb{R}. Then the following hold.

1. (Linearity) If aa and bb are cube-summable, then so are a+ba+b and λa\lambda a (pointwise operations), and

∑k∈Zn(a(k)+b(k))=∑k∈Zna(k)+∑k∈Znb(k),∑k∈Znλa(k)=λ∑k∈Zna(k).\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}}\bigl(a(k)+b(k)\bigr)=\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}}a(k)+\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}}b(k),\qquad\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}}\lambda a(k)=\lambda\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}}a(k).

2. (Nonnegative families) Suppose 0≤a(k)0\le a(k) for every k∈Znk\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}. Then SN(a)≤SM(a)S_{N}(a)\le S_{M}(a) whenever N≤MN\le M, and aa is cube-summable if and only if the set {SN(a):N∈N}\{S_{N}(a):N\in\mathbb{N}\} is bounded above; in that case ∑k∈Zna(k)\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}}a(k) is the supremum of that set, 0≤∑k∈Zna(k)0\le\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}}a(k), and ∑k∈Ea(k)≤∑k∈Zna(k)\sum_{k\in E}a(k)\le\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}}a(k) for every nonempty finite set E⊆ZnE\subseteq\mathbb{Z}^{n}.

3. (Enumerations) Suppose 0≤a(k)0\le a(k) for every k∈Znk\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}, and let κ:N→Zn\kappa:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{Z}^{n} be a bijection. Then the series ∑j=1∞a(κ(j))\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}a(\kappa(j)) converges if and only if aa is cube-summable, and in that case

∑j=1∞a(κ(j))=∑k∈Zna(k).\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}a(\kappa(j))=\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}}a(k).

4. (Absolute summability) If ∣a∣|a| is cube-summable, then aa is cube-summable and ∣∑k∈Zna(k)∣≤∑k∈Zn∣a(k)∣\bigl|\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}}a(k)\bigr|\le\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}}|a(k)|.

5. (Comparison) If bb is cube-summable and ∣a(k)∣≤b(k)|a(k)|\le b(k) for every k∈Znk\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}, then ∣a∣|a| and aa are cube-summable and ∑k∈Zn∣a(k)∣≤∑k∈Znb(k)\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}}|a(k)|\le\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}}b(k).

6. (Finitely supported families) If E⊆ZnE\subseteq\mathbb{Z}^{n} is a nonempty finite set and a(k)=0a(k)=0 for every k∉Ek\notin E, then aa is cube-summable, SN(a)=∑k∈Ea(k)S_{N}(a)=\sum_{k\in E}a(k) for every NN with E⊆ΓNE\subseteq\Gamma_{N}, and ∑k∈Zna(k)=∑k∈Ea(k)\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}}a(k)=\sum_{k\in E}a(k).

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…