TheoremBase

Reduction of the Theorem on Sums to a Global Quadratic Bound

Normalises the data of the theorem on sums by translation and an affine correction and localises the summands to a closed ball, producing upper semicontinuous functions bounded above on the whole space that vanish at the origin, satisfy a global quadratic bound with matrix A+θIA+\theta I, and from which admissible test data at the origin returns to the original functions.

Statement

Throughout we work in the setting of Differential Calculus and Convexity on Euclidean Open Sets: Standing Notation, whose notation, including that of Euclidean Space and Real Matrices: Standing Notation on which it rests, is in force in the dimensions n1n_{1}, n2n_{2} and N=n1+n2N=n_{1}+n_{2}, for natural numbers n1n_{1} and n2n_{2} with 1≤n11\le n_{1} and 1≤n21\le n_{2}. In particular ι:Rn1×Rn2→RN\iota:\mathbb{R}^{n_{1}}\times\mathbb{R}^{n_{2}}\to\mathbb{R}^{N} is the concatenation map, a bijection. Closed balls Bˉ(x,ρ)\bar{B}(x,\rho) of (Rq,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{q},d_{E}) are those of Closed Ball in a Metric Space.

We abbreviate ∥z∥2=∥z∥⋅∥z∥\lVert z\rVert^{2}=\lVert z\rVert\cdot\lVert z\rVert, and s2\tfrac{s}{2} denotes the product of s∈Rs\in\mathbb{R} with the multiplicative inverse of 2=1+12=1+1, which exists by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. The sets Rn1\mathbb{R}^{n_{1}}, Rn2\mathbb{R}^{n_{2}} and RN\mathbb{R}^{N} are open, directly from Open Subset of a Metric Space. That a quadruple is approximable by test data from above for a function on an open set is as defined there.

Let Ω1⊆Rn1\Omega_{1}\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{n_{1}} and Ω2⊆Rn2\Omega_{2}\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{n_{2}} be open and, for i∈{1,2}i\in\{1,2\}, let ui:Ωi→Ru_{i}:\Omega_{i}\to\mathbb{R} be upper semicontinuous on Ωi\Omega_{i}. Put

Ω={ ι(ξ,η) : ξ∈Ω1, η∈Ω2 },\Omega=\{\,\iota(\xi,\eta)\ :\ \xi\in\Omega_{1},\ \eta\in\Omega_{2}\,\},

which is open in RN\mathbb{R}^{N} by Twice Differentiability of a Sum in Separated Variables (i), and let w:Ω→Rw:\Omega\to\mathbb{R} be the function determined by

w(ι(ξ,η))=u1(ξ)+u2(η)(ξ∈Ω1, η∈Ω2),w\bigl(\iota(\xi,\eta)\bigr)=u_{1}(\xi)+u_{2}(\eta)\qquad(\xi\in\Omega_{1},\ \eta\in\Omega_{2}),

which is well defined because ι\iota is injective.

Let V⊆RNV\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{N} be open with Ω⊆V\Omega\subseteq V, let φ:V→R\varphi:V\to\mathbb{R} be of class C2C^{2} on VV, and let x^∈Ω\hat{x}\in\Omega be a point at which w−φw-\varphi has a local maximum relative to Ω\Omega. Let (x^1,x^2)∈Rn1×Rn2(\hat{x}_{1},\hat{x}_{2})\in\mathbb{R}^{n_{1}}\times\mathbb{R}^{n_{2}} be the unique pair with ι(x^1,x^2)=x^\iota(\hat{x}_{1},\hat{x}_{2})=\hat{x}, and let (p1,p2)(p_{1},p_{2}) be the unique pair with ι(p1,p2)=Dφ(x^)\iota(p_{1},p_{2})=D\varphi(\hat{x}); put A=D2φ(x^)∈S(N)A=D^{2}\varphi(\hat{x})\in\mathcal{S}(N). Note that x^i∈Ωi\hat{x}_{i}\in\Omega_{i} for i∈{1,2}i\in\{1,2\}, since x^∈Ω\hat{x}\in\Omega and ι\iota is injective.

Let θ∈R\theta\in\mathbb{R} be positive and put Aθ=A+θINA_{\theta}=A+\theta I_{N}, which lies in S(N)\mathcal{S}(N) by Euclidean Space and Real Matrices: Standing Notation (iii).

For i∈{1,2}i\in\{1,2\} put Ωi−x^i={ζ∈Rni:ζ+x^i∈Ωi}\Omega_{i}-\hat{x}_{i}=\{\zeta\in\mathbb{R}^{n_{i}}:\zeta+\hat{x}_{i}\in\Omega_{i}\}, which is open by Quadratic and Affine Functions of Class C2C^2, Translation, and Quadratic Perturbation of Semiconvexity (ii) and contains 0Rni0_{\mathbb{R}^{n_{i}}}, and let u~i:Ωi−x^i→R\tilde{u}_{i}:\Omega_{i}-\hat{x}_{i}\to\mathbb{R} be given by

u~i(ζ)=ui(ζ+x^i)−pi⋅ζ−ui(x^i),\tilde{u}_{i}(\zeta)=u_{i}(\zeta+\hat{x}_{i})-p_{i}\cdot\zeta-u_{i}(\hat{x}_{i}),

so that u~i(0Rni)=0\tilde{u}_{i}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{n_{i}}})=0.

Then there are a positive r∈Rr\in\mathbb{R} and functions v1:Rn1→Rv_{1}:\mathbb{R}^{n_{1}}\to\mathbb{R} and v2:Rn2→Rv_{2}:\mathbb{R}^{n_{2}}\to\mathbb{R} for which the following hold.

1. (Localised summands) For each i∈{1,2}i\in\{1,2\}: the closed ball Bˉ(0Rni,r)\bar{B}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{n_{i}}},r) is contained in Ωi−x^i\Omega_{i}-\hat{x}_{i}; the function viv_{i} is upper semicontinuous on Rni\mathbb{R}^{n_{i}}; the set of values of viv_{i} has an upper bound in R\mathbb{R}; vi(ζ)=u~i(ζ)v_{i}(\zeta)=\tilde{u}_{i}(\zeta) for every ζ∈Rni\zeta\in\mathbb{R}^{n_{i}} with ∥ζ∥≤r\lVert\zeta\rVert\le r; and in particular vi(0Rni)=0v_{i}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{n_{i}}})=0.

2. (Global quadratic bound) For all ξ∈Rn1\xi\in\mathbb{R}^{n_{1}} and η∈Rn2\eta\in\mathbb{R}^{n_{2}},

v1(ξ)+v2(η) ≤ 12 ι(ξ,η)⋅(Aθ ι(ξ,η)).v_{1}(\xi)+v_{2}(\eta)\ \le\ \tfrac{1}{2}\,\iota(\xi,\eta)\cdot\bigl(A_{\theta}\,\iota(\xi,\eta)\bigr).

3. (Test data returns to the original functions) Let i∈{1,2}i\in\{1,2\} and let X∈S(ni)X\in\mathcal{S}(n_{i}). If the quadruple (0Rni,vi(0Rni),0Rni,X)\bigl(0_{\mathbb{R}^{n_{i}}},v_{i}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{n_{i}}}),0_{\mathbb{R}^{n_{i}}},X\bigr) is approximable by test data from above for viv_{i}, the domain being Rni\mathbb{R}^{n_{i}}, then the quadruple (x^i,ui(x^i),pi,X)\bigl(\hat{x}_{i},u_{i}(\hat{x}_{i}),p_{i},X\bigr) is approximable by test data from above for uiu_{i}, the domain being Ωi\Omega_{i}.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…