TheoremBase

The Bump Construction on the Noise Wasserstein Space: the Local Maximum of a Viscosity Subsolution and a Penalised Noise Intrinsic Test Function

Inside a noise Wasserstein ball, replace a viscosity subsolution v by the maximum of v and a test function minus a multiple of the penalty, which stays below v near the edge of the ball. If the test function satisfies the shifted subsolution inequality wherever it wins, the result is again a viscosity subsolution of the first-order equation.

Statement

In the setting of First-Order Equations on the Noise Wasserstein Space Relative to a Noise Penalty Pair: Standing Notation, let (D,DΣ,E,Σ)(\mathcal{D},\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma},\mathcal{E},\Sigma) be a noise-closed noise penalty pair on Pρa\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} with regular penalised maxima, and let FF be a first-order equation operator over DΣ\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, with δ\delta-shifts Fδ−F^{-}_{\delta} and Fδ+F^{+}_{\delta} relative to that pair for each positive δ∈R\delta\in\mathbb{R}. Noise intrinsic test functions on D\mathcal{D} and their gradients along noise couplings ∇ψ(ν)\nabla\psi(\nu), viscosity subsolutions of FF relative to the pair, penalty-subordinate growth from above of a function on D\mathcal{D}, and the δ\delta-envelopes vδ−v^{-}_{\delta} of such a function, functions on D\mathcal{D}, are those of the items cited; max⁡{a,b}\max\{a,b\} is the maximum of a,b∈Ra,b\in\mathbb{R}.

Let λ∈R\lambda\in\mathbb{R} be positive, let μ^∈Pρa\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}, let γ∈R\gamma\in\mathbb{R} be positive, let ψ\psi be a noise intrinsic test function on D\mathcal{D}, and let v:D→Rv:\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} be a viscosity subsolution of FF relative to the noise penalty pair. Let w:D→Rw:\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} be given by

w(ν)=max⁡{ψ(ν)−λ E(ν), v(ν)}  if Wa(ν,μ^)<γ,w(ν)=v(ν)  otherwise.w(\nu)=\max\{\psi(\nu)-\lambda\,\mathcal{E}(\nu),\,v(\nu)\}\ \text{ if }W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\gamma,\qquad w(\nu)=v(\nu)\ \text{ otherwise}.

For ν∈DΣ\nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} one has ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D} by Noise Penalty Pairs on the Noise Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §pair and ∇ψ(ν)∈Tνa⊆L2(ν;Xa)\nabla\psi(\nu)\in T^{a}_{\nu}\subseteq L^{2}(\nu;X^{a}) by property (b) of Noise Intrinsic Test Functions on the Noise Wasserstein Space §differentiability, so that Fλ+(ν,ψ(ν),∇ψ(ν))F^{+}_{\lambda}(\nu,\psi(\nu),\nabla\psi(\nu)) is a real number. Assume the following.

(Upper bound) There is b∈Rb\in\mathbb{R} with ψ(ν)≤b\psi(\nu)\le b for every ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D} with Wa(ν,μ^)<γW_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\gamma.

(Annulus condition) ψ(ν)−λ E(ν)≤v(ν)\psi(\nu)-\lambda\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)\le v(\nu) for every ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D} with γ2<Wa(ν,μ^)<γ\tfrac{\gamma}{2}<W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\gamma.

(Test condition) For every ν∈DΣ\nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} with Wa(ν,μ^)<γW_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\gamma and v(ν)<ψ(ν)−λ E(ν)v(\nu)<\psi(\nu)-\lambda\,\mathcal{E}(\nu),

Fλ+(ν,ψ(ν),∇ψ(ν))≤0.F^{+}_{\lambda}\bigl(\nu,\psi(\nu),\nabla\psi(\nu)\bigr)\le0 .

Then the following hold.

1. (Growth, agreement and domination) The function ww has penalty-subordinate growth from above, and w(ν)=v(ν)w(\nu)=v(\nu) for every ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D} with γ2<Wa(ν,μ^)\tfrac{\gamma}{2}<W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu}). Moreover, v(ν)≤w(ν)v(\nu)\le w(\nu) for every ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D}.

2. (The δ\delta-envelope of ww) For every positive δ∈R\delta\in\mathbb{R},

wδ−(ν)=max⁡{ψ(ν)−(λ+δ) E(ν), vδ−(ν)}for every ν∈D with Wa(ν,μ^)<γ,w^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)=\max\bigl\{\psi(\nu)-(\lambda+\delta)\,\mathcal{E}(\nu),\ v^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)\bigr\}\qquad\text{for every }\nu\in\mathcal{D}\text{ with }W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\gamma,

and wδ−(ν)=vδ−(ν)w^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)=v^{-}_{\delta}(\nu) for every ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D} with γ2<Wa(ν,μ^)\tfrac{\gamma}{2}<W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu}).

3. (The bump is a viscosity subsolution) The function ww is a viscosity subsolution of FF relative to the noise penalty pair.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…