TheoremBase

Existence and Basic Estimates at a Maximiser of the Gauge-Doubled Difference on the Wasserstein Space

For a coercive penalty pair the difference of the delta-envelopes penalised by the squared centred heat gauge attains its supremum; at any maximiser the penalty and the second moment are bounded independently of the doubling strength, and if the two functions are Lipschitz for the gauge the doubling strength times the gauge is at most twice the Lipschitz constant.

Statement

In the setting of Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation, let (D,DΣ,E,Σ)(\mathcal{D},\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma},\mathcal{E},\Sigma) be a coercive penalty pair on P2(Rd)\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), let ρ\rho be the centred heat gauge, a metric on P2(Rd)\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) by The Centred Heat Gauge: Metric Properties, Comparison with the Wasserstein Distance, Behaviour Under Translations, the Squared Gauge as a Test Function, and the Polarisation Inequality (i), and let M2M_{2} be the second moment. The set D\mathcal{D} contains DΣ\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} by Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains (i), which is nonempty by Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains (ii); fix μ0∈D\mu_{0}\in\mathcal{D} and fix e0∈Re_{0}\in\mathbb{R} with e0≤E(μ)e_{0}\le\mathcal{E}(\mu) for every μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}, as provided by Basic Properties of a Coercive Penalty Pair: a Lower Bound for the Penalty, Semicontinuity, and Exact Delta-Envelopes (i).

Let δ∈R\delta\in\mathbb{R} be positive and let u,v:P2(Rd)→Ru,v:\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d})\to\mathbb{R} be continuous on P2(Rd)\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) in (P2(Rd),ρ)(\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),\rho); fix b,b′∈Rb,b'\in\mathbb{R} with u(σ)≤bu(\sigma)\le b and b′≤v(σ)b'\le v(\sigma) for every σ∈P2(Rd)\sigma\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}). By Continuity, Semicontinuity and Lipschitz Bounds Pass from the Centred Heat Gauge to the Wasserstein Distance (i), read with A=P2(Rd)A=\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), the functions uu and vv are continuous, so that by Basic Properties of a Coercive Penalty Pair: a Lower Bound for the Penalty, Semicontinuity, and Exact Delta-Envelopes (iv) the δ\delta-envelope uδ−u^{-}_{\delta} of uu and the δ\delta-envelope vδ+v^{+}_{\delta} of vv relative to the penalty pair are defined, with values u(ν)−δE(ν)u(\nu)-\delta\mathcal{E}(\nu) and v(ν)+δE(ν)v(\nu)+\delta\mathcal{E}(\nu) at ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D}. For positive α∈R\alpha\in\mathbb{R} let Φα:D×D→R\Phi_{\alpha}:\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} be the function with value

Φα(μ,ν)=uδ−(μ)−vδ+(ν)−α2 ρ(μ,ν)2\Phi_{\alpha}(\mu,\nu)=u^{-}_{\delta}(\mu)-v^{+}_{\delta}(\nu)-\tfrac{\alpha}{2}\,\rho(\mu,\nu)^{2}

at (μ,ν)∈D×D(\mu,\nu)\in\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D}, and put

c0=δ−1(b−b′−u(μ0)+v(μ0)+2δ E(μ0))−e0.c_{0}=\delta^{-1}\bigl(b-b'-u(\mu_{0})+v(\mu_{0})+2\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\mu_{0})\bigr)-e_{0}.

Then the following hold.

1. (A maximiser exists) For every positive α∈R\alpha\in\mathbb{R} there is (μ^,ν^)∈D×D(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})\in\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D} such that Φα(μ,ν)≤Φα(μ^,ν^)\Phi_{\alpha}(\mu,\nu)\le\Phi_{\alpha}(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu}) for every (μ,ν)∈D×D(\mu,\nu)\in\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D}.

2. (The penalty is bounded at a near-maximiser) Let α∈R\alpha\in\mathbb{R} be positive, let η∈R\eta\in\mathbb{R} be nonnegative, and let (μ^,ν^)∈D×D(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})\in\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D} satisfy Φα(μ0,μ0)−η≤Φα(μ^,ν^)\Phi_{\alpha}(\mu_{0},\mu_{0})-\eta\le\Phi_{\alpha}(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu}). Then

δ E(μ^)+δ E(ν^)≤b−b′−u(μ0)+v(μ0)+2δ E(μ0)+η,\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\hat{\mu})+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\hat{\nu})\le b-b'-u(\mu_{0})+v(\mu_{0})+2\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\mu_{0})+\eta,

and consequently E(μ^)≤c0+δ−1η\mathcal{E}(\hat{\mu})\le c_{0}+\delta^{-1}\eta and E(ν^)≤c0+δ−1η\mathcal{E}(\hat{\nu})\le c_{0}+\delta^{-1}\eta.

3. (The second moment is bounded at a near-maximiser) In the situation of claim 2, let R∈RR\in\mathbb{R} be as in Coercive Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space (iii) for the level c=c0+δ−1ηc=c_{0}+\delta^{-1}\eta. Then M2(μ^)≤RM_{2}(\hat{\mu})\le R and M2(ν^)≤RM_{2}(\hat{\nu})\le R. In particular RR does not depend on α\alpha.

4. (The gauge at a maximiser under a Lipschitz bound) Let L∈RL\in\mathbb{R} be nonnegative and suppose that

∣u(μ)−u(ν)∣≤L ρ(μ,ν),∣v(μ)−v(ν)∣≤L ρ(μ,ν)(μ,ν∈P2(Rd)).|u(\mu)-u(\nu)|\le L\,\rho(\mu,\nu),\qquad|v(\mu)-v(\nu)|\le L\,\rho(\mu,\nu)\qquad\bigl(\mu,\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d})\bigr).

Let α∈R\alpha\in\mathbb{R} be positive and let (μ^,ν^)∈D×D(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})\in\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D} satisfy Φα(μ,ν)≤Φα(μ^,ν^)\Phi_{\alpha}(\mu,\nu)\le\Phi_{\alpha}(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu}) for every (μ,ν)∈D×D(\mu,\nu)\in\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D}. Then

α ρ(μ^,ν^)≤2L,α ρ(μ^,ν^)2≤4L2α−1.\alpha\,\rho(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})\le2L,\qquad\alpha\,\rho(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})^{2}\le4L^{2}\alpha^{-1}.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…