In the setting of Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation , let ( D , D Σ , E , Σ ) (\mathcal{D},\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma},\mathcal{E},\Sigma) ( D , D Σ , E , Σ ) be a coercive penalty pair on P 2 ( R d ) \mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) P 2 ( R d ) , let ρ \rho ρ be the centred heat gauge , a metric on P 2 ( R d ) \mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) P 2 ( R d ) by The Centred Heat Gauge: Metric Properties, Comparison with the Wasserstein Distance, Behaviour Under Translations, the Squared Gauge as a Test Function, and the Polarisation Inequality (i) , and let M 2 M_{2} M 2 be the second moment . The set D \mathcal{D} D contains D Σ \mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} D Σ by Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains (i) , which is nonempty by Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains (ii) ; fix μ 0 ∈ D \mu_{0}\in\mathcal{D} μ 0 ∈ D and fix e 0 ∈ R e_{0}\in\mathbb{R} e 0 ∈ R with e 0 ≤ E ( μ ) e_{0}\le\mathcal{E}(\mu) e 0 ≤ E ( μ ) for every μ ∈ D \mu\in\mathcal{D} μ ∈ D , as provided by Basic Properties of a Coercive Penalty Pair: a Lower Bound for the Penalty, Semicontinuity, and Exact Delta-Envelopes (i) .
Let δ ∈ R \delta\in\mathbb{R} δ ∈ R be positive and let u , v : P 2 ( R d ) → R u,v:\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d})\to\mathbb{R} u , v : P 2 ( R d ) → R be continuous on P 2 ( R d ) \mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) P 2 ( R d ) in ( P 2 ( R d ) , ρ ) (\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),\rho) ( P 2 ( R d ) , ρ ) ; fix b , b ′ ∈ R b,b'\in\mathbb{R} b , b ′ ∈ R with u ( σ ) ≤ b u(\sigma)\le b u ( σ ) ≤ b and b ′ ≤ v ( σ ) b'\le v(\sigma) b ′ ≤ v ( σ ) for every σ ∈ P 2 ( R d ) \sigma\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) σ ∈ P 2 ( R d ) . By Continuity, Semicontinuity and Lipschitz Bounds Pass from the Centred Heat Gauge to the Wasserstein Distance (i) , read with A = P 2 ( R d ) A=\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) A = P 2 ( R d ) , the functions u u u and v v v are continuous , so that by Basic Properties of a Coercive Penalty Pair: a Lower Bound for the Penalty, Semicontinuity, and Exact Delta-Envelopes (iv) the δ \delta δ -envelope u δ − u^{-}_{\delta} u δ − of u u u and the δ \delta δ -envelope v δ + v^{+}_{\delta} v δ + of v v v relative to the penalty pair are defined, with values u ( ν ) − δ E ( ν ) u(\nu)-\delta\mathcal{E}(\nu) u ( ν ) − δ E ( ν ) and v ( ν ) + δ E ( ν ) v(\nu)+\delta\mathcal{E}(\nu) v ( ν ) + δ E ( ν ) at ν ∈ D \nu\in\mathcal{D} ν ∈ D . For positive α ∈ R \alpha\in\mathbb{R} α ∈ R let Φ α : D × D → R \Phi_{\alpha}:\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} Φ α : D × D → R be the function with value
Φ α ( μ , ν ) = u δ − ( μ ) − v δ + ( ν ) − α 2 ρ ( μ , ν ) 2 \Phi_{\alpha}(\mu,\nu)=u^{-}_{\delta}(\mu)-v^{+}_{\delta}(\nu)-\tfrac{\alpha}{2}\,\rho(\mu,\nu)^{2} Φ α ( μ , ν ) = u δ − ( μ ) − v δ + ( ν ) − 2 α ρ ( μ , ν ) 2
at ( μ , ν ) ∈ D × D (\mu,\nu)\in\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D} ( μ , ν ) ∈ D × D , and put
c 0 = δ − 1 ( b − b ′ − u ( μ 0 ) + v ( μ 0 ) + 2 δ E ( μ 0 ) ) − e 0 . c_{0}=\delta^{-1}\bigl(b-b'-u(\mu_{0})+v(\mu_{0})+2\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\mu_{0})\bigr)-e_{0}. c 0 = δ − 1 ( b − b ′ − u ( μ 0 ) + v ( μ 0 ) + 2 δ E ( μ 0 ) ) − e 0 .
Then the following hold.
1. (A maximiser exists) (i) For every positive α ∈ R \alpha\in\mathbb{R} α ∈ R there is ( μ ^ , ν ^ ) ∈ D × D (\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})\in\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D} ( μ ^ , ν ^ ) ∈ D × D such that Φ α ( μ , ν ) ≤ Φ α ( μ ^ , ν ^ ) \Phi_{\alpha}(\mu,\nu)\le\Phi_{\alpha}(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu}) Φ α ( μ , ν ) ≤ Φ α ( μ ^ , ν ^ ) for every ( μ , ν ) ∈ D × D (\mu,\nu)\in\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D} ( μ , ν ) ∈ D × D .
2. (The penalty is bounded at a near-maximiser) (ii) Let α ∈ R \alpha\in\mathbb{R} α ∈ R be positive, let η ∈ R \eta\in\mathbb{R} η ∈ R be nonnegative, and let ( μ ^ , ν ^ ) ∈ D × D (\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})\in\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D} ( μ ^ , ν ^ ) ∈ D × D satisfy Φ α ( μ 0 , μ 0 ) − η ≤ Φ α ( μ ^ , ν ^ ) \Phi_{\alpha}(\mu_{0},\mu_{0})-\eta\le\Phi_{\alpha}(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu}) Φ α ( μ 0 , μ 0 ) − η ≤ Φ α ( μ ^ , ν ^ ) . Then
δ E ( μ ^ ) + δ E ( ν ^ ) ≤ b − b ′ − u ( μ 0 ) + v ( μ 0 ) + 2 δ E ( μ 0 ) + η , \delta\,\mathcal{E}(\hat{\mu})+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\hat{\nu})\le b-b'-u(\mu_{0})+v(\mu_{0})+2\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\mu_{0})+\eta, δ E ( μ ^ ) + δ E ( ν ^ ) ≤ b − b ′ − u ( μ 0 ) + v ( μ 0 ) + 2 δ E ( μ 0 ) + η ,
and consequently E ( μ ^ ) ≤ c 0 + δ − 1 η \mathcal{E}(\hat{\mu})\le c_{0}+\delta^{-1}\eta E ( μ ^ ) ≤ c 0 + δ − 1 η and E ( ν ^ ) ≤ c 0 + δ − 1 η \mathcal{E}(\hat{\nu})\le c_{0}+\delta^{-1}\eta E ( ν ^ ) ≤ c 0 + δ − 1 η .
3. (The second moment is bounded at a near-maximiser) (iii) In the situation of claim 2, let R ∈ R R\in\mathbb{R} R ∈ R be as in Coercive Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space (iii) for the level c = c 0 + δ − 1 η c=c_{0}+\delta^{-1}\eta c = c 0 + δ − 1 η . Then M 2 ( μ ^ ) ≤ R M_{2}(\hat{\mu})\le R M 2 ( μ ^ ) ≤ R and M 2 ( ν ^ ) ≤ R M_{2}(\hat{\nu})\le R M 2 ( ν ^ ) ≤ R . In particular R R R does not depend on α \alpha α .
4. (The gauge at a maximiser under a Lipschitz bound) (iv) Let L ∈ R L\in\mathbb{R} L ∈ R be nonnegative and suppose that
∣ u ( μ ) − u ( ν ) ∣ ≤ L ρ ( μ , ν ) , ∣ v ( μ ) − v ( ν ) ∣ ≤ L ρ ( μ , ν ) ( μ , ν ∈ P 2 ( R d ) ) . |u(\mu)-u(\nu)|\le L\,\rho(\mu,\nu),\qquad|v(\mu)-v(\nu)|\le L\,\rho(\mu,\nu)\qquad\bigl(\mu,\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d})\bigr). ∣ u ( μ ) − u ( ν ) ∣ ≤ L ρ ( μ , ν ) , ∣ v ( μ ) − v ( ν ) ∣ ≤ L ρ ( μ , ν ) ( μ , ν ∈ P 2 ( R d ) ) .
Let α ∈ R \alpha\in\mathbb{R} α ∈ R be positive and let ( μ ^ , ν ^ ) ∈ D × D (\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})\in\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D} ( μ ^ , ν ^ ) ∈ D × D satisfy Φ α ( μ , ν ) ≤ Φ α ( μ ^ , ν ^ ) \Phi_{\alpha}(\mu,\nu)\le\Phi_{\alpha}(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu}) Φ α ( μ , ν ) ≤ Φ α ( μ ^ , ν ^ ) for every ( μ , ν ) ∈ D × D (\mu,\nu)\in\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D} ( μ , ν ) ∈ D × D . Then
α ρ ( μ ^ , ν ^ ) ≤ 2 L , α ρ ( μ ^ , ν ^ ) 2 ≤ 4 L 2 α − 1 . \alpha\,\rho(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})\le2L,\qquad\alpha\,\rho(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})^{2}\le4L^{2}\alpha^{-1}. α ρ ( μ ^ , ν ^ ) ≤ 2 L , α ρ ( μ ^ , ν ^ ) 2 ≤ 4 L 2 α − 1 .