Reason: First publication. Pre-stopping envelope for the state fluctuation with the noise majorant Q and its fourth-moment bound, the energy identity, and the unstopped envelope carrying the deviation Y_t itself.
Statement
Adopt the setting, notation and definitions of the extended good-set stopping-time lemma: the affine-controlled transition-rate family(β0,β1) on l states with compact convex control set A⊆Rm, its transition-rate familyβ with rate bound B and state-Lipschitz constant Λb, the horizon T>0, the solution of the controlled N-agent dynamics with N agents, regular event Ω0, empirical state measure Σ, observation filtration (Gt)t∈[0,T] and system filtration (Ftsys)t∈[0,T], the realized control α^, the point x0∈Δl, the realized mean-field flow Φ, the map S∗ and deviation Y, the map A and energy E, the barriers εY, cE>0, δ>0, θout>0, the clipped-out time O, the times τY, τE, τout, and the extended good-set time τ∗=min(τY,τE,τout). Adopt additionally the setting, hypotheses and notation of the pathwise tracking lemma for the same affine-controlled transition-rate family, observation-rate family, horizon, driving system (Ω,F,P), policy, solution, and realized control α^ — only claims 1 and 2 of that lemma are used here, so its population cost data may be taken arbitrary (for instance identically zero, which is convex in the control) and plays no role in the conclusions, and its hypothesis (LipC) is not assumed — including the martingale part M=(M1,…,Ml) of the martingale decomposition of the empirical state measure and the nondecreasing integrals Mt(ω)=∫[0,t]∣Ms(ω)∣ds of claim 1 of the tracking lemma, defined for ω∈Ω0; and the random variable I of part (b) of the restricted-moments lemma for the martingale part, together with the constants cM, κT=BT+(BT)2 and KM=2+2(l−1)BT fixed in the preamble of that lemma, so that I=MT on Ω0 and E[∣Mt∣4]≤cMκTN−2 and E[I4]≤T4cMκTN−2.
Let (S,A) be a mean-field trajectory pair for β with horizon T whose control is the map A above (its components, being continuous, are measurable by claim 3 of the Borel toolkit for metric spaces) and whose initial state is S0=x0; take S∗=S. Let st=N(Σt−St) be the state fluctuation process of the fluctuation processes of the controlled N-agent dynamics for this trajectory pair, and at=N(αt−At) its control fluctuation, α being the control of the solution. Assume εY>0. Write 1D for the function equal to 1 on a set D and 0 off it, E for the expectation, and set
κ0=1+E[∣s0∣4],
which is finite because ∣s0∣≤2N everywhere: every coordinate of a point of the probability simplex lies in [0,1], so the squared Euclidean norm of a point is at most its coordinate sum 1, and ∣Σ0−S0∣≤∣Σ0∣+∣S0∣≤2.
For each γ∈{1,…,l} let Mγ=supt∈D(1Ω0∣Mtγ∣) be the supremum random variable of the supremum lemma for bounded right-continuous processes applied to the process (1Ω0Mtγ)t∈[0,T], with D the set of dyadic partition points of [0,T] of that lemma, and put M=(∑γ=1l(Mγ)2)1/2. Define, for ω∈Ω0 and t∈[0,T] (the letter b is used because β names the rate family),
3. (Restricted second and fourth moments.) For all s,t∈[0,T] the functions 1Ω0∣smin(t,τ∗)∣2 (with smin(t,τ∗) the componentwise sampled function, smin(t,τ∗)γ(ω)=smin(t,τ∗(ω))γ(ω)) and 1Ω01{s<τ∗}∣ss∣2 are random variables, and for every event D′∈F,
Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.