Fix parameters χ \chi χ , ψ \psi ψ , q q q , q 0 q_{0} q 0 , μ \mu μ , T T T , a ‾ \underline{a} a , a ˉ \bar{a} a ˉ as in The Ising Population Data (i) and adopt the Ising population data with those parameters: the control set A \mathcal{A} A , the open sets U U U , V V V , U c U_{c} U c , U ~ \tilde{U} U ~ , the transition-rate coefficients ( β 0 , β 1 ) (\beta_{0},\beta_{1}) ( β 0 , β 1 ) with the rates β \beta β and their extension β ˉ \bar{\beta} β ˉ , the observation rates β ~ \tilde{\beta} β ~ with their extension β ~ ˉ \bar{\tilde{\beta}} β ~ ˉ , the costs ( L , G ) (L,G) ( L , G ) with their extension ( L ˉ , G ˉ ) (\bar{L},\bar{G}) ( L ˉ , G ˉ ) , the function ϕ \phi ϕ , and the vectors v v v , n \mathsf{n} n . Write Λ \Lambda Λ for the Lipschitz constant of an affine-controlled transition-rate family , B B B for the rate bound of a transition-rate family , K K K for the derivative bound of a twice continuously differentiable extension of such a family, B ~ \tilde{B} B ~ and K ~ \tilde{K} K ~ for the corresponding constants of an observation-rate family and of its twice continuously differentiable extension , and K c K_{c} K c for the second-derivative bound of a twice continuously differentiable extension of population cost data . Adopt the coordinate and partial-derivative notation ∂ i \partial_{i} ∂ i of the extension definitions, so that ∂ 1 , ∂ 2 \partial_{1},\partial_{2} ∂ 1 , ∂ 2 differentiate in the state coordinates x 1 , x 2 x^{1},x^{2} x 1 , x 2 and ∂ 3 , ∂ 4 \partial_{3},\partial_{4} ∂ 3 , ∂ 4 in the control coordinates a 1 , a 2 a^{1},a^{2} a 1 , a 2 . Then the following hold.
1. (The control set.) (i) A \mathcal{A} A is a nonempty convex subset of R 2 \mathbb{R}^{2} R 2 , compact for the topology determined by the Euclidean distance ; thus hypothesis (A) of Quadratic Growth of the Mean-Field Hamiltonian in the Control along a Stationary Mean-Field Triple holds. Moreover sup a ∈ A ∣ a ∣ = 2 a ˉ \sup_{a\in\mathcal{A}}|a|=\sqrt{2}\,\bar{a} sup a ∈ A ∣ a ∣ = 2 a ˉ , and, with
ϱ A = min { 1 − a ‾ , a ˉ − 1 } > 0 , \varrho_{\mathcal{A}}=\min\{1-\underline{a},\ \bar{a}-1\}>0 , ϱ A = min { 1 − a , a ˉ − 1 } > 0 ,
every a ∈ R 2 a\in\mathbb{R}^{2} a ∈ R 2 with ∣ a − ( 1 , 1 ) ∣ ≤ ϱ A |a-(1,1)|\le\varrho_{\mathcal{A}} ∣ a − ( 1 , 1 ) ∣ ≤ ϱ A lies in A \mathcal{A} A .
2. (The transition-rate family and its drift.) (ii) The pair ( β 0 , β 1 ) (\beta_{0},\beta_{1}) ( β 0 , β 1 ) is an affine-controlled transition-rate family on 2 2 2 states with control set A \mathcal{A} A and Lipschitz constant Λ = 0 \Lambda=0 Λ = 0 . The transition-rate family that The Transition-Rate Family and Aggregate Drift of Affine-Controlled Data associates with it is the family β \beta β of clause The Ising Population Data (iv) , and it is a transition-rate family on 2 2 2 states with control set A \mathcal{A} A and rate bound B = a ˉ B=\bar{a} B = a ˉ . Its aggregate state drift is
b ( Σ , α ) = ( Σ 2 α 2 − Σ 1 α 1 ) v ( Σ ∈ Δ 2 , α ∈ A ) . b(\Sigma,\alpha)=\bigl(\Sigma^{2}\alpha^{2}-\Sigma^{1}\alpha^{1}\bigr)\,v\qquad(\Sigma\in\Delta^{2},\ \alpha\in\mathcal{A}). b ( Σ , α ) = ( Σ 2 α 2 − Σ 1 α 1 ) v ( Σ ∈ Δ 2 , α ∈ A ) .
3. (The aggregate fluctuation covariance.) (iii) The aggregate fluctuation covariance of β \beta β is
Θ ( Σ , α ) = ( Σ 1 α 1 + Σ 2 α 2 ) v v ⊤ ( Σ ∈ Δ 2 , α ∈ A ) . \Theta(\Sigma,\alpha)=\bigl(\Sigma^{1}\alpha^{1}+\Sigma^{2}\alpha^{2}\bigr)\,vv^{\top}\qquad(\Sigma\in\Delta^{2},\ \alpha\in\mathcal{A}). Θ ( Σ , α ) = ( Σ 1 α 1 + Σ 2 α 2 ) v v ⊤ ( Σ ∈ Δ 2 , α ∈ A ) .
4. (The rate extension.) (iv) The triple ( U , V , β ˉ ) (U,V,\bar{\beta}) ( U , V , β ˉ ) is a twice continuously differentiable extension of β \beta β with derivative bound K = 1 K=1 K = 1 . Its only nonvanishing partial derivatives of order one or two are ∂ 3 β ˉ ( 1 , 2 , ⋅ ) = 1 \partial_{3}\bar{\beta}(1,2,\cdot)=1 ∂ 3 β ˉ ( 1 , 2 , ⋅ ) = 1 and ∂ 4 β ˉ ( 2 , 1 , ⋅ ) = 1 \partial_{4}\bar{\beta}(2,1,\cdot)=1 ∂ 4 β ˉ ( 2 , 1 , ⋅ ) = 1 on U × V U\times V U × V . Its extended aggregate state drift is
b ˉ ( x , a ) = ( x 2 a 2 − x 1 a 1 ) v ( ( x , a ) ∈ U × V ) . \bar{b}(x,a)=\bigl(x^{2}a^{2}-x^{1}a^{1}\bigr)\,v\qquad\bigl((x,a)\in U\times V\bigr). b ˉ ( x , a ) = ( x 2 a 2 − x 1 a 1 ) v ( ( x , a ) ∈ U × V ) .
5. (The observation-rate family.) (v) The family β ~ \tilde{\beta} β ~ is an observation-rate family on 2 2 2 states with 2 2 2 observation channels and rate bound B ~ = q + q 0 \tilde{B}=q+q_{0} B ~ = q + q 0 . Its aggregate observation drift is b ~ υ ( Σ ) = q Σ υ + q 0 \tilde{b}^{\upsilon}(\Sigma)=q\,\Sigma^{\upsilon}+q_{0} b ~ υ ( Σ ) = q Σ υ + q 0 for Σ ∈ Δ 2 \Sigma\in\Delta^{2} Σ ∈ Δ 2 and υ ∈ { 1 , 2 } \upsilon\in\{1,2\} υ ∈ { 1 , 2 } , and satisfies b ~ υ ( Σ ) ≥ q 0 > 0 \tilde{b}^{\upsilon}(\Sigma)\ge q_{0}>0 b ~ υ ( Σ ) ≥ q 0 > 0 for all such Σ \Sigma Σ and υ \upsilon υ ; thus hypothesis (OC) of Injection Certificates on the Trimmed Synthetic Copy for the Family of N-Agent Solutions: the Law-Transported Van Trees Certificate Hypothesis Holds under Deterministic Initial States, Uniform Observation Positivity and a C^2 Observation Extension holds with b ‾ = q 0 \underline{b}=q_{0} b = q 0 .
6. (The observation-rate extension.) (vi) The pair ( U ~ , β ~ ˉ ) (\tilde{U},\bar{\tilde{\beta}}) ( U ~ , β ~ ˉ ) is a twice continuously differentiable extension of β ~ \tilde{\beta} β ~ with derivative bound K ~ = 0 \tilde{K}=0 K ~ = 0 ; all its partial derivatives of order one and two vanish. Its extended aggregate observation drift is
b ~ ˉ υ ( x ) = q x υ + q 0 ( x 1 + x 2 ) ( x ∈ U ~ , υ ∈ { 1 , 2 } ) . \bar{\tilde{b}}^{\upsilon}(x)=q\,x^{\upsilon}+q_{0}\,(x^{1}+x^{2})\qquad(x\in\tilde{U},\ \upsilon\in\{1,2\}). b ~ ˉ υ ( x ) = q x υ + q 0 ( x 1 + x 2 ) ( x ∈ U ~ , υ ∈ { 1 , 2 }) .
7. (The population cost data.) (vii) The pair ( L , G ) (L,G) ( L , G ) is population cost data on 2 2 2 states with control dimension 2 2 2 , with lower bounds C L = C G = 0 C_{L}=C_{G}=0 C L = C G = 0 . Moreover L ( x , a ) ≥ 0 L(x,a)\ge0 L ( x , a ) ≥ 0 for every ( x , a ) ∈ Δ 2 × R 2 (x,a)\in\Delta^{2}\times\mathbb{R}^{2} ( x , a ) ∈ Δ 2 × R 2 , and L ( x , a ) = 0 L(x,a)=0 L ( x , a ) = 0 holds if and only if x = ( 1 2 , 1 2 ) x=\bigl(\tfrac{1}{2},\tfrac{1}{2}\bigr) x = ( 2 1 , 2 1 ) and a = ( 1 , 1 ) a=(1,1) a = ( 1 , 1 ) . For every x ∈ Δ 2 x\in\Delta^{2} x ∈ Δ 2 the map a ↦ L ( x , a ) a\mapsto L(x,a) a ↦ L ( x , a ) is convex on R 2 \mathbb{R}^{2} R 2 ; in particular L L L is convex in the control on A \mathcal{A} A . Finally, hypothesis (LipC) of Pointwise-in-Time Tracking of the Mean-Field Flow and Cost along the Realized Control of the Controlled N-Agent Dynamics holds with
K L = 2 ( 2 a ˉ 2 χ a ‾ + ψ ) , K G = 0. K_{L}=\sqrt{2}\,\Bigl(\frac{2\bar{a}^{2}}{\chi\,\underline{a}}+\psi\Bigr),\qquad K_{G}=0 . K L = 2 ( χ a 2 a ˉ 2 + ψ ) , K G = 0.
8. (The cost extension.) (viii) The triple ( U c , L ˉ , G ˉ ) (U_{c},\bar{L},\bar{G}) ( U c , L ˉ , G ˉ ) is a twice continuously differentiable extension of ( L , G ) (L,G) ( L , G ) with second-derivative bound
K c = ψ + 2 μ + 2 ( a ˉ + 1 ) χ a ‾ . K_{c}=\psi+2\mu+\frac{2(\bar{a}+1)}{\chi\,\underline{a}} . K c = ψ + 2 μ + χ a 2 ( a ˉ + 1 ) .
All partial derivatives of G ˉ \bar{G} G ˉ vanish, and the partial derivatives of L ˉ \bar{L} L ˉ on U c × R 2 U_{c}\times\mathbb{R}^{2} U c × R 2 are
∂ 1 L ˉ = χ − 1 ϕ ( a 1 ) − ψ ( x 2 − x 1 ) + 2 μ ( x 1 + x 2 − 1 ) , ∂ 2 L ˉ = χ − 1 ϕ ( a 2 ) + ψ ( x 2 − x 1 ) + 2 μ ( x 1 + x 2 − 1 ) , \partial_{1}\bar{L}=\chi^{-1}\phi(a^{1})-\psi\,(x^{2}-x^{1})+2\mu\,(x^{1}+x^{2}-1),\qquad \partial_{2}\bar{L}=\chi^{-1}\phi(a^{2})+\psi\,(x^{2}-x^{1})+2\mu\,(x^{1}+x^{2}-1), ∂ 1 L ˉ = χ − 1 ϕ ( a 1 ) − ψ ( x 2 − x 1 ) + 2 μ ( x 1 + x 2 − 1 ) , ∂ 2 L ˉ = χ − 1 ϕ ( a 2 ) + ψ ( x 2 − x 1 ) + 2 μ ( x 1 + x 2 − 1 ) ,
∂ 3 L ˉ = χ − 1 x 1 ϕ ′ ( a 1 ) , ∂ 4 L ˉ = χ − 1 x 2 ϕ ′ ( a 2 ) , \partial_{3}\bar{L}=\chi^{-1}x^{1}\phi'(a^{1}),\qquad \partial_{4}\bar{L}=\chi^{-1}x^{2}\phi'(a^{2}), ∂ 3 L ˉ = χ − 1 x 1 ϕ ′ ( a 1 ) , ∂ 4 L ˉ = χ − 1 x 2 ϕ ′ ( a 2 ) ,
and, for the second order,
∂ 1 ∂ 1 L ˉ = ∂ 2 ∂ 2 L ˉ = ψ + 2 μ , ∂ 2 ∂ 1 L ˉ = ∂ 1 ∂ 2 L ˉ = 2 μ − ψ , \partial_{1}\partial_{1}\bar{L}=\partial_{2}\partial_{2}\bar{L}=\psi+2\mu,\qquad \partial_{2}\partial_{1}\bar{L}=\partial_{1}\partial_{2}\bar{L}=2\mu-\psi, ∂ 1 ∂ 1 L ˉ = ∂ 2 ∂ 2 L ˉ = ψ + 2 μ , ∂ 2 ∂ 1 L ˉ = ∂ 1 ∂ 2 L ˉ = 2 μ − ψ ,
∂ 3 ∂ 1 L ˉ = ∂ 1 ∂ 3 L ˉ = χ − 1 ϕ ′ ( a 1 ) , ∂ 4 ∂ 2 L ˉ = ∂ 2 ∂ 4 L ˉ = χ − 1 ϕ ′ ( a 2 ) , ∂ 4 ∂ 1 L ˉ = ∂ 1 ∂ 4 L ˉ = ∂ 3 ∂ 2 L ˉ = ∂ 2 ∂ 3 L ˉ = 0 , \partial_{3}\partial_{1}\bar{L}=\partial_{1}\partial_{3}\bar{L}=\chi^{-1}\phi'(a^{1}),\qquad \partial_{4}\partial_{2}\bar{L}=\partial_{2}\partial_{4}\bar{L}=\chi^{-1}\phi'(a^{2}),\qquad \partial_{4}\partial_{1}\bar{L}=\partial_{1}\partial_{4}\bar{L}=\partial_{3}\partial_{2}\bar{L}=\partial_{2}\partial_{3}\bar{L}=0, ∂ 3 ∂ 1 L ˉ = ∂ 1 ∂ 3 L ˉ = χ − 1 ϕ ′ ( a 1 ) , ∂ 4 ∂ 2 L ˉ = ∂ 2 ∂ 4 L ˉ = χ − 1 ϕ ′ ( a 2 ) , ∂ 4 ∂ 1 L ˉ = ∂ 1 ∂ 4 L ˉ = ∂ 3 ∂ 2 L ˉ = ∂ 2 ∂ 3 L ˉ = 0 ,
∂ 3 ∂ 3 L ˉ = χ − 1 x 1 ϕ ′ ′ ( a 1 ) , ∂ 4 ∂ 4 L ˉ = χ − 1 x 2 ϕ ′ ′ ( a 2 ) , ∂ 4 ∂ 3 L ˉ = ∂ 3 ∂ 4 L ˉ = 0 , \partial_{3}\partial_{3}\bar{L}=\chi^{-1}x^{1}\phi''(a^{1}),\qquad \partial_{4}\partial_{4}\bar{L}=\chi^{-1}x^{2}\phi''(a^{2}),\qquad \partial_{4}\partial_{3}\bar{L}=\partial_{3}\partial_{4}\bar{L}=0 , ∂ 3 ∂ 3 L ˉ = χ − 1 x 1 ϕ ′′ ( a 1 ) , ∂ 4 ∂ 4 L ˉ = χ − 1 x 2 ϕ ′′ ( a 2 ) , ∂ 4 ∂ 3 L ˉ = ∂ 3 ∂ 4 L ˉ = 0 ,
all evaluated at the point ( x , a ) (x,a) ( x , a ) .