TheoremBase

The Gibbs Measure of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure

The Gibbs measure of an admissible cylindrical potential V at temperature beta is the probability measure with density proportional to exp(-V/beta) with respect to the diagonal Gaussian reference measure.

Statement

In the setting of A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation, let VV be an admissible cylindrical potential, let bb be a constant as in Admissible Cylindrical Potentials on a Hilbert Space in the Noise Geometry §below, and let β∈R\beta\in\mathbb{R} be positive; exp⁡\exp is the exponential function, with the properties listed in Basic Properties of the Exponential Function.

(The weight) Write wV,β=exp⁡(−V/β):X→Rw_{V,\beta}=\exp(-V/\beta):X\to\mathbb{R}. It is Borel and satisfies 0<wV,β(x)≤exp⁡(b/β)0<w_{V,\beta}(x)\le\exp(b/\beta) for every x∈Xx\in X. Indeed, by Basic Properties of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential: Continuity, Growth under Noise Translations, Integrability, the Tangent Inequality and Tangency of the Noise Gradient §continuity, VV is continuous on XX and −b≤V(x)-b\le V(x) for every x∈Xx\in X; exp⁡\exp is a smooth map on R\mathbb{R} by claim 3 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function, and so continuous, whence wV,βw_{V,\beta} is continuous, hence Borel; wV,β(x)>0w_{V,\beta}(x)>0 by claim 2 of that theorem; and −V(x)/β≤b/β-V(x)/\beta\le b/\beta, β\beta being positive, so wV,β(x)≤exp⁡(b/β)w_{V,\beta}(x)\le\exp(b/\beta) since exp⁡\exp is increasing by claim 4 of that theorem.

(The normaliser) The normaliser of VV at temperature β\beta is

ZV,β=∫XwV,β dγc,Z_{V,\beta}=\int_{X}w_{V,\beta}\,d\gamma_{c},

a positive real number. Indeed, by the clause on the weight above and the monotonicity of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative, applied with f=wV,βf=w_{V,\beta} and gg the constant function exp⁡(b/β)\exp(b/\beta), ∫XwV,β dγc≤exp⁡(b/β) γc(X)=exp⁡(b/β)<∞\int_{X}w_{V,\beta}\,d\gamma_{c}\le\exp(b/\beta)\,\gamma_{c}(X)=\exp(b/\beta)<\infty, γc\gamma_{c} being a probability measure; so the nonnegative Borel function wV,βw_{V,\beta} is integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c} and ZV,βZ_{V,\beta} is a nonnegative real number. It is not 00: otherwise wV,β(x)=0w_{V,\beta}(x)=0 for γc\gamma_{c}-almost every xx by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §vanishing, whereas wV,β>0w_{V,\beta}>0 everywhere on XX by the clause on the weight above and γc(X)=1\gamma_{c}(X)=1.

(The Gibbs measure) The Gibbs measure of VV at temperature β\beta relative to γc\gamma_{c} is the function γβV\gamma^{V}_{\beta} on B(X)\mathcal{B}(X),

γβV(A)=1ZV,β∫X1A wV,β dγc(A∈B(X)),\gamma^{V}_{\beta}(A)=\frac{1}{Z_{V,\beta}}\int_{X}\mathbf{1}_{A}\,w_{V,\beta}\,d\gamma_{c}\qquad(A\in\mathcal{B}(X)),

with ZV,βZ_{V,\beta} the normaliser of the preceding clause. Here 1AwV,β\mathbf{1}_{A}w_{V,\beta} is Borel, as a product of Borel functions, and 0≤1AwV,β≤wV,β0\le\mathbf{1}_{A}w_{V,\beta}\le w_{V,\beta}. It is a Borel probability measure on XX: each value is a real number in [0,1][0,1], since ∫X1AwV,β dγc≤ZV,β\int_{X}\mathbf{1}_{A}w_{V,\beta}\,d\gamma_{c}\le Z_{V,\beta} by the monotonicity of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative; γβV(X)=ZV,β−1ZV,β=1\gamma^{V}_{\beta}(X)=Z_{V,\beta}^{-1}Z_{V,\beta}=1 and γβV(∅)=0\gamma^{V}_{\beta}(\emptyset)=0; and for pairwise disjoint A1,A2,⋯∈B(X)A_{1},A_{2},\dots\in\mathcal{B}(X) with union AA the partial sums ∑i=1m1AiwV,β=1A1∪⋯∪AmwV,β\sum_{i=1}^{m}\mathbf{1}_{A_{i}}w_{V,\beta}=\mathbf{1}_{A_{1}\cup\dots\cup A_{m}}w_{V,\beta} increase pointwise to 1AwV,β\mathbf{1}_{A}w_{V,\beta}, so that countable additivity follows from Monotone Convergence Theorem and the additivity of the integral of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…