The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere
lemmaAnalysislem:integral-almost-everywhere-2026aCountable unions of null sets are null; integrals ignore null sets; a nonnegative integral vanishes exactly when the integrand vanishes almost everywhere; Markov's inequality; and dominated convergence under almost-everywhere hypotheses.
In the setting of Measure Spaces and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation, let be a measure space. Then the following hold.
1. (Null sets)¶ Every subset of a null set is null, and the union of the members of a sequence of null sets is null. Consequently, if for each a property of points of holds almost everywhere, then the set of points at which fails for at least one is null; that is, almost every point of satisfies for every simultaneously.
2. (Integrals over null sets)¶ Let be measurable and let be a null set such that for every . Then
3. (Almost-everywhere comparison)¶ Let be measurable. If for almost every , then ; if for almost every , then . If are measurable, is integrable and for almost every , then is integrable and .
4. (Vanishing integral)¶ Let be measurable. Then if and only if for almost every .
5. (Finiteness almost everywhere)¶ Let be measurable with . Then the set belongs to and has measure ; in particular for almost every .
6. (Markov's inequality)¶ Let be measurable and let be a positive real number. Then the set belongs to and
the product being formed in .
7. (Dominated convergence almost everywhere)¶ Let and , for , be measurable maps from to , and let be integrable. Suppose that for almost every the sequence converges to , and that for each one has for almost every . Then and every are integrable,
Loading…
Prerequisites
No prerequisites tracked.
Dependents
No dependents yet.
Dependent proofs
No dependent proofs yet.
No relations recorded yet.