TheoremBase

A Lipschitz Estimate Between the Maximisers of Two Linear Perturbations of a Semiconvex Function

If a linear perturbation of a semiconvex function with constant λ\lambda attains its maximum over a closed ball at a point of the concentric half ball, and a second, nearby perturbation attains its maximum somewhere in the ball, then the two perturbing vectors differ by at most 2λ2\lambda times the distance between the maximisers; in particular the maximiser determines the perturbation.

Statement

Let nn be a natural number with 1≤n1\le n and let R\mathbb{R} be the real numbers with the order ≤\le of their ordered field structure; 22 denotes 1+11+1, which satisfies 0<20<2 and so has a multiplicative inverse by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and a2\tfrac{a}{2} denotes the product of aa with that inverse. Regard Euclidean space Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} as a real vector space, with the sum of points, the scalar multiple, and the difference y−xy-x and dot product p⋅xp\cdot x of points; write ∥ ⋅ ∥\lVert\,\cdot\,\rVert for the Euclidean norm and dEd_{E} for the Euclidean distance, a metric on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} with dE(x,y)=∥x−y∥d_{E}(x,y)=\lVert x-y\rVert by claim 2 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square. Closed balls BˉdE\bar{B}_{d_{E}} are those of Closed Ball in a Metric Space.

Let U⊆RnU\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{n} be convex, let λ∈R\lambda\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0<λ0<\lambda, and let φ:U→R\varphi:U\to\mathbb{R} be semiconvex on UU with constant λ\lambda. Let x^∈Rn\hat{x}\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and r∈Rr\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0<r0<r and BˉdE(x^,r)⊆U\bar{B}_{d_{E}}(\hat{x},r)\subseteq U, and write Bˉ=BˉdE(x^,r)\bar{B}=\bar{B}_{d_{E}}(\hat{x},r).

Let p,p′∈Rnp,p'\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, let x∈BˉdE(x^,r2)x\in\bar{B}_{d_{E}}\bigl(\hat{x},\tfrac{r}{2}\bigr) and let x′∈Bˉx'\in\bar{B} satisfy

φ(y)+p⋅y≤φ(x)+p⋅xandφ(y)+p′⋅y≤φ(x′)+p′⋅x′for every y∈Bˉ,\varphi(y)+p\cdot y\le\varphi(x)+p\cdot x\quad\text{and}\quad \varphi(y)+p'\cdot y\le\varphi(x')+p'\cdot x'\qquad\text{for every }y\in\bar{B},

and suppose in addition that

∥p−p′∥≤λr2.\lVert p-p'\rVert\le\frac{\lambda r}{2}.

Then the following hold.

1. (Monotonicity estimate)

∥p−p′∥2≤2λ (p−p′)⋅(x−x′).\lVert p-p'\rVert^{2}\le 2\lambda\,(p-p')\cdot(x-x').

2. (Lipschitz estimate)

∥p−p′∥≤2λ ∥x−x′∥.\lVert p-p'\rVert\le 2\lambda\,\lVert x-x'\rVert .

In particular, if x=x′x=x' then p=p′p=p'.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…