Pointwise-in-Time Tracking of the Mean-Field Flow and Cost along the Realized Control of the Controlled N-Agent Dynamics
lemmaAnalysisProbabilitylem:n-agent-pathwise-tracking-2026aAdopt the setting, hypotheses, and notation of the comparison lemma for the -agent system and the mean-field flow: the affine-controlled transition-rate family on states with control set and its transition-rate family with rate bound , aggregate state drift , and state-Lipschitz constant ; the observation-rate family ; the horizon ; the population cost data , convex in the control on ; the probability simplex ; the set of -valued controls with the metric of the compactness lemma for the simplex, the control set and their product, formed from the fixed dense sequence of claim 1 of the weak metrizability theorem — the same sequence, hence the same metric , being used in the boundedness, lower-semicontinuity and attainment theorem and in the realized-control lemma cited below; the mean-field flow of claim 2 of the flow stability lemma; the mean-field cost ; the -agent driving system , the -valued observation-driven control policy , and the solution with regular event and empirical state measure ; the realized control of the realized-control lemma; the martingale part of the martingale decomposition of the empirical state measure; the event of the martingale bound; and the random variable of claim 2 of the comparison lemma, so that for and . Write for the Euclidean norm, for the expectation, for the exponential function, and for the Lebesgue integral over the compact interval , taken to be for . For every write for the mean-field flow started at the realized initial state and driven by the realized control; it is defined for every by claim 2 of the flow stability lemma, since and , and on it is the of claim 1 of the comparison lemma. Write for the projected drift of claim 6 of the affine-rate lemma. Set
(LipC) (Lipschitz cost data.) Assume there are real numbers and such that and for all and all . This hypothesis is used in claim 3 and in the estimate of claim 4 only. (The constant defined above is that of the martingale bound.)
Then the following hold.
1. (Paths of the martingale part.) For every and every the path is measurable with respect to the trace Borel -algebra on and the Borel -algebra on the real line, and for every ; consequently is measurable and bounded by (with the nonnegative square root), and the integrals exist for every and are nondecreasing in .
2. (Pointwise-in-time tracking of the flow.) For every and every ,
3. (Tracking of the cost.) Under (LipC), for every ,
4. (Shift of the initial state.) Let . The map is a random variable, and under (LipC), for every ,
Loading…
Prerequisites
No prerequisites tracked.
Dependents
No dependents yet.
Dependent proofs
No dependent proofs yet.
No relations recorded yet.