TheoremBase

The Displacement Midpoint and the Midpoint Split of the Squared Wasserstein Distance

The midpoint of an optimal coupling of two measures lies at a quarter of their squared distance from each, and the squared Wasserstein distance between any two measures is bounded by twice the centred squared distances of each to that midpoint plus the squared distance of their means, with equality at the original pair; at a pair attaining equality, the optimal map to the midpoint is the average of the identity and the optimal map between the pair, up to a constant.

Statement

In the setting of The Intrinsic Calculus on the Wasserstein Space: Standing Notation, let μ,ν∈P2(Rd)\mu,\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) and let π^∈Π(μ,ν)\hat{\pi}\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) be an optimal coupling. Let h:Rd+d→Rdh:\mathbb{R}^{d+d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} be the map with h(z)=12(x+y)h(z)=\tfrac12(x+y), where 12\tfrac12 is the multiplicative inverse of 22 (claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field); each component of hh is continuous, so hh is Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (ii). Put

m^=h#π^,c=12(m(μ)+m(ν))∈Rd,\hat{m}=h_{\#}\hat{\pi},\qquad c=\tfrac12\bigl(m(\mu)+m(\nu)\bigr)\in\mathbb{R}^{d},

where m(⋅)m(\cdot) denotes the mean. For ρ∈P2(Rd)\rho\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) put

A(ρ)=W2(ρ,m^)2−∥m(ρ)−c∥2,A(\rho)=W_{2}(\rho,\hat{m})^{2}-\lVert m(\rho)-c\rVert^{2},

a real number once m^∈P2(Rd)\hat{m}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), which is part of claim 1. Then the following hold.

1. (The displacement midpoint) m^∈P2(Rd)\hat{m}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), m(m^)=cm(\hat{m})=c, and

W2(μ,m^)2=W2(m^,ν)2=14 W2(μ,ν)2.W_{2}(\mu,\hat{m})^{2}=W_{2}(\hat{m},\nu)^{2}=\tfrac14\,W_{2}(\mu,\nu)^{2}.

2. (Nonnegativity) 0≤A(ρ)0\le A(\rho) for every ρ∈P2(Rd)\rho\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}).

3. (The midpoint split) For all ρ,σ∈P2(Rd)\rho,\sigma\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),

W2(ρ,σ)2 ≤ 2A(ρ)+2A(σ)+∥m(ρ)−m(σ)∥2.W_{2}(\rho,\sigma)^{2}\ \le\ 2A(\rho)+2A(\sigma)+\lVert m(\rho)-m(\sigma)\rVert^{2}.

4. (Equality at the endpoints)

W2(μ,ν)2=2A(μ)+2A(ν)+∥m(μ)−m(ν)∥2.W_{2}(\mu,\nu)^{2}=2A(\mu)+2A(\nu)+\lVert m(\mu)-m(\nu)\rVert^{2}.

5. (The optimal map to the midpoint at a pair attaining equality) Let ρ,σ∈P2(Rd)\rho,\sigma\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) attain equality in claim 3, and suppose that the ordered pair (ρ,σ)(\rho,\sigma) is uniquely mapped; let TT be an optimal map from ρ\rho to m^\hat{m} and SS an optimal map from ρ\rho to σ\sigma, with classes id−T\mathrm{id}-T and id−S\mathrm{id}-S in L2(ρ;Rd)L^{2}(\rho;\mathbb{R}^{d}) as in The Optimal Map as a Square-Integrable Vector Field: Integrability, Transport Cost and Uniqueness of the Class (i). Then

id−T=12(id−S)+ein L2(ρ;Rd),\mathrm{id}-T=\tfrac12(\mathrm{id}-S)+e\qquad\text{in }L^{2}(\rho;\mathbb{R}^{d}),

where ee is the class of the constant map with value 12(m(ρ)+m(σ))−c\tfrac12\bigl(m(\rho)+m(\sigma)\bigr)-c, which is Borel, being continuous, and square-integrable against the probability measure ρ\rho.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…