Adopt the setting and notation of The Record-Driven Causal Intensity of the Open-Loop Aggregate Solution: Joint Measurability of the Record-Frozen Control, the Regularised Recursion Path, Non-Anticipation, and Measurability of the Likelihood : natural numbers N ≥ 1 N\ge1 N ≥ 1 , l ≥ 2 l\ge2 l ≥ 2 , m ≥ 1 m\ge1 m ≥ 1 , l ~ ≥ 1 \tilde{l}\ge1 l ~ ≥ 1 , the control set A ⊆ R m \mathcal{A}\subseteq\mathbb{R}^m A ⊆ R m , real numbers B ≥ 0 B\ge0 B ≥ 0 , B ~ ≥ 0 \tilde{B}\ge0 B ~ ≥ 0 and T > 0 T>0 T > 0 , the transition-rate family β \beta β , the observation-rate family β ~ \tilde\beta β ~ with aggregate observation drift b ~ \tilde{b} b ~ , the aggregate lattice G N \mathbb{G}_N G N and the point x 0 ∈ G N x_0\in\mathbb{G}_N x 0 ∈ G N , the transition labels c c c (the ordered pairs ( σ , γ ) (\sigma,\gamma) ( σ , γ ) of distinct elements of { 1 , … , l } \{1,\dots,l\} { 1 , … , l } , of which there are l ( l − 1 ) l(l-1) l ( l − 1 ) ), the observation record space ( R , R , ρ ) (\mathbf{R},\mathcal{R},\rho) ( R , R , ρ ) with horizon T T T and l ~ \tilde{l} l ~ channels, with cells C ∅ C_\emptyset C ∅ and C k , v C_{k,v} C k , v and with R ( k ) \mathbf{R}^{(k)} R ( k ) the set of records with exactly k k k events (the measure ρ \rho ρ is σ \sigma σ -finite: there are countably many cells, ρ ( C ∅ ) = 1 \rho(C_\emptyset)=1 ρ ( C ∅ ) = 1 , and ρ ( C k , v ) \rho(C_{k,v}) ρ ( C k , v ) is the volume of the ordered time simplex D k ( T ) D_k(T) D k ( T ) , which is finite), and the observation-driven control policy h h h with values in A \mathcal{A} A , with record-frozen control paths a r a^r a r . Let N \mathbb{N} N be the set of natural numbers and N 0 = N ∪ { 0 } \mathbb{N}_0=\mathbb{N}\cup\{0\} N 0 = N ∪ { 0 } . Let R > 0 R>0 R > 0 be a real number with R ≥ N B T R\ge NBT R ≥ NBT , and for every transition label c c c let J c ≥ 1 J_c\ge1 J c ≥ 1 be a natural number and 0 = b 0 c < b 1 c < ⋯ < b J c c = R 0=b^{c}_0<b^{c}_1<\dots<b^{c}_{J_c}=R 0 = b 0 c < b 1 c < ⋯ < b J c c = R real numbers; the cells of the clock c c c are the intervals I c , j = ( b j − 1 c , b j c ] I_{c,j}=(b^{c}_{j-1},b^{c}_j] I c , j = ( b j − 1 c , b j c ] , 1 ≤ j ≤ J c 1\le j\le J_c 1 ≤ j ≤ J c , of lengths ∣ I c , j ∣ = b j c − b j − 1 c |I_{c,j}|=b^{c}_j-b^{c}_{j-1} ∣ I c , j ∣ = b j c − b j − 1 c . Let L \mathsf{L} L be the set of all pairs ( c , j ) (c,j) ( c , j ) with c c c a transition label and 1 ≤ j ≤ J c 1\le j\le J_c 1 ≤ j ≤ J c , a finite set with d = ∑ c J c ≥ 1 d=\sum_{c}J_c\ge1 d = ∑ c J c ≥ 1 elements; fix a bijection of L \mathsf{L} L with { 1 , … , d } \{1,\dots,d\} { 1 , … , d } and index the coordinates of points of Euclidean space R d \mathbb{R}^d R d by L \mathsf{L} L , writing e c , j e_{c,j} e c , j for the standard basis vector of the coordinate ( c , j ) (c,j) ( c , j ) and N 0 L ⊆ R d \mathbb{N}_0^{\mathsf{L}}\subseteq\mathbb{R}^d N 0 L ⊆ R d for the set of points with all coordinates in N 0 \mathbb{N}_0 N 0 . Let η \eta η be a real number with 0 < η ≤ 1 0<\eta\le1 0 < η ≤ 1 and let φ η \varphi_\eta φ η be the Gaussian smoothing weight on R d \mathbb{R}^d R d . Write p o i μ ( k ) = exp ( − μ ) μ k / k ! \mathrm{poi}_\mu(k)=\exp(-\mu)\mu^{k}/k! poi μ ( k ) = exp ( − μ ) μ k / k ! (k ∈ N 0 k\in\mathbb{N}_0 k ∈ N 0 , μ ≥ 0 \mu\ge0 μ ≥ 0 ) for the mass function of the Poisson distribution with parameter μ \mu μ , with the exponential function exp \exp exp ; B ( R d ) \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^d) B ( R d ) for the Borel σ \sigma σ -algebra and λ d \lambda_d λ d for Lebesgue measure on R d \mathbb{R}^d R d ; ⊗ \otimes ⊗ for product σ \sigma σ -algebras and product measures , triple products always being written with explicit parentheses; E \mathbb{E} E for the expectation on ( Ω , F , P ) (\Omega,\mathcal{F},P) ( Ω , F , P ) , extended to [ 0 , ∞ ] [0,\infty] [ 0 , ∞ ] -valued measurable maps as their integrals with respect to P P P ; 1 { ⋅ } \mathbf{1}\{\cdot\} 1 { ⋅ } for the indicator of an event; and ∥ ⋅ ∥ \lVert\cdot\rVert ∥ ⋅ ∥ for the Euclidean norm .
The driving variables. Let ( Ω , F , P ) (\Omega,\mathcal{F},P) ( Ω , F , P ) be a probability space carrying an independent family of random variables
K c ( c a label ) , V i c ( c a label , i ∈ N ) , U i c , j ( ( c , j ) ∈ L , i ∈ N ) , K^{c}\ (c\text{ a label}),\qquad V^{c}_i\ (c\text{ a label},\ i\in\mathbb{N}),\qquad U^{c,j}_i\ ((c,j)\in\mathsf{L},\ i\in\mathbb{N}), K c ( c a label ) , V i c ( c a label , i ∈ N ) , U i c , j (( c , j ) ∈ L , i ∈ N ) ,
where K c K^{c} K c has the Poisson distribution with parameter R R R , V i c V^{c}_i V i c has the uniform law on ( 0 , R ] (0,R] ( 0 , R ] and U i c , j U^{c,j}_i U i c , j has the uniform law on I c , j I_{c,j} I c , j , in the sense of Uniform Representation of the Rate-One Poisson Counting Path on a Bounded Interval: Distinct Points, Poisson Increments, Conditional Law Given the Cell Counts, and Point Insertion ; such a space exists by Existence of Independent Sequences with Prescribed Distributions . For each label c c c , the variables K c K^{c} K c , ( V i c ) i (V^{c}_i)_i ( V i c ) i , ( U i c , j ) j , i (U^{c,j}_i)_{j,i} ( U i c , j ) j , i (an independent family, as a subfamily of an independent family) with the cells I c , 1 , … , I c , J c I_{c,1},\dots,I_{c,J_c} I c , 1 , … , I c , J c form the data of Uniform Representation of the Rate-One Poisson Counting Path on a Bounded Interval: Distinct Points, Poisson Increments, Conditional Law Given the Cell Counts, and Point Insertion ; let K ~ c \widetilde{K}^{c} K c , the uniform Poisson path p c p^{c} p c , the deterministic-count paths p c , ( y ) p^{c,(y)} p c , ( y ) (y ∈ N 0 J c y\in\mathbb{N}_0^{J_c} y ∈ N 0 J c ), the cell counts (written K c , j \mathsf{K}_{c,j} K c , j here, 1 ≤ j ≤ J c 1\le j\le J_c 1 ≤ j ≤ J c ; they are the C j C_j C j of that lemma, a symbol reserved here for the cells C k , v C_{k,v} C k , v of the record space) and the event Ω 0 c \Omega^{c}_0 Ω 0 c be the corresponding objects of that lemma. Let V \mathcal{V} V be the σ \sigma σ -algebra generated by all K c K^{c} K c and V i c V^{c}_i V i c , let U \mathcal{U} U be the σ \sigma σ -algebra generated by all U i c , j U^{c,j}_i U i c , j , let Ω 0 U \Omega^{U}_0 Ω 0 U be the event that for every label c c c the points U i c , j U^{c,j}_i U i c , j (1 ≤ j ≤ J c 1\le j\le J_c 1 ≤ j ≤ J c , i ∈ N i\in\mathbb{N} i ∈ N ) are pairwise distinct with U i c , j ∈ I c , j U^{c,j}_i\in I_{c,j} U i c , j ∈ I c , j , and let K : Ω → N 0 L \mathsf{K}:\Omega\to\mathbb{N}_0^{\mathsf{L}} K : Ω → N 0 L be the cell-count vector with coordinates K c , j \mathsf{K}_{c,j} K c , j .
The clocks. For y ∈ N 0 L y\in\mathbb{N}_0^{\mathsf{L}} y ∈ N 0 L , a label c c c and u ≥ 0 u\ge0 u ≥ 0 put
P u ( y ) , c = 1 Ω 0 U ∑ j = 1 J c ∑ i = 1 y c , j 1 { U i c , j ≤ u } , P u ♯ , c ( ω ) = P u ( K ( ω ) ) , c ( ω ) , \mathsf{P}^{(y),c}_u=\mathbf{1}_{\Omega^{U}_0}\sum_{j=1}^{J_c}\sum_{i=1}^{y_{c,j}}\mathbf{1}\{U^{c,j}_i\le u\},\qquad \mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_u(\omega)=\mathsf{P}^{(\mathsf{K}(\omega)),c}_u(\omega), P u ( y ) , c = 1 Ω 0 U ∑ j = 1 J c ∑ i = 1 y c , j 1 { U i c , j ≤ u } , P u ♯ , c ( ω ) = P u ( K ( ω )) , c ( ω ) ,
the deterministic-count clocks P ( y ) = ( P ( y ) , c ) c \mathsf{P}^{(y)}=(\mathsf{P}^{(y),c})_c P ( y ) = ( P ( y ) , c ) c and the copy clocks P ♯ = ( P ♯ , c ) c \mathsf{P}^{\sharp}=(\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c})_c P ♯ = ( P ♯ , c ) c .
1. (Independent cell structure) U \mathcal{U} U and V \mathcal{V} V are independent ; Ω 0 U ∈ U \Omega^{U}_0\in\mathcal{U} Ω 0 U ∈ U and P ( Ω 0 U ) = 1 P(\Omega^{U}_0)=1 P ( Ω 0 U ) = 1 ; each K c , j \mathsf{K}_{c,j} K c , j is a V \mathcal{V} V -measurable random variable with values in N 0 \mathbb{N}_0 N 0 and E [ K c , j ] = ∣ I c , j ∣ \mathbb{E}[\mathsf{K}_{c,j}]=|I_{c,j}| E [ K c , j ] = ∣ I c , j ∣ ; P ( K = y ) = ∏ ( c , j ) ∈ L p o i ∣ I c , j ∣ ( y c , j ) > 0 P(\mathsf{K}=y)=\prod_{(c,j)\in\mathsf{L}}\mathrm{poi}_{|I_{c,j}|}(y_{c,j})>0 P ( K = y ) = ∏ ( c , j ) ∈ L poi ∣ I c , j ∣ ( y c , j ) > 0 for every y ∈ N 0 L y\in\mathbb{N}_0^{\mathsf{L}} y ∈ N 0 L , and ∑ y ∈ N 0 L P ( K = y ) = 1 \sum_{y\in\mathbb{N}_0^{\mathsf{L}}}P(\mathsf{K}=y)=1 ∑ y ∈ N 0 L P ( K = y ) = 1 ; and for every y ∈ N 0 L y\in\mathbb{N}_0^{\mathsf{L}} y ∈ N 0 L and every U \mathcal{U} U -measurable Z : Ω → [ 0 , ∞ ] Z:\Omega\to[0,\infty] Z : Ω → [ 0 , ∞ ] ,
E [ 1 { K = y } Z ] = P ( K = y ) E [ Z ] in [ 0 , ∞ ] . \mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}\{\mathsf{K}=y\}\,Z\bigr]=P(\mathsf{K}=y)\,\mathbb{E}[Z]\qquad\text{in }[0,\infty]. E [ 1 { K = y } Z ] = P ( K = y ) E [ Z ] in [ 0 , ∞ ] .
2. (Clock structure) For every y ∈ N 0 L y\in\mathbb{N}_0^{\mathsf{L}} y ∈ N 0 L and every label c c c : every path u ↦ P u ( y ) , c ( ω ) u\mapsto\mathsf{P}^{(y),c}_u(\omega) u ↦ P u ( y ) , c ( ω ) is a counting path , each P u ( y ) , c \mathsf{P}^{(y),c}_u P u ( y ) , c is U \mathcal{U} U -measurable, and P u ( y ) , c ( ω ) = p u c , ( y c , ⋅ ) ( ω ) \mathsf{P}^{(y),c}_u(\omega)=p^{c,(y_{c,\cdot})}_u(\omega) P u ( y ) , c ( ω ) = p u c , ( y c , ⋅ ) ( ω ) for ω ∈ Ω 0 U \omega\in\Omega^{U}_0 ω ∈ Ω 0 U and u ∈ [ 0 , R ] u\in[0,R] u ∈ [ 0 , R ] , where y c , ⋅ = ( y c , 1 , … , y c , J c ) y_{c,\cdot}=(y_{c,1},\dots,y_{c,J_c}) y c , ⋅ = ( y c , 1 , … , y c , J c ) . Every path of P ♯ , c \mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c} P ♯ , c is a counting path and each P u ♯ , c \mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_u P u ♯ , c is F \mathcal{F} F -measurable. For m ∈ N \mathsf{m}\in\mathbb{N} m ∈ N and ( c 0 , j 0 ) ∈ L (c_0,j_0)\in\mathsf{L} ( c 0 , j 0 ) ∈ L , one has P ( y + m e c 0 , j 0 ) , c = P ( y ) , c \mathsf{P}^{(y+\mathsf{m}e_{c_0,j_0}),c}=\mathsf{P}^{(y),c} P ( y + m e c 0 , j 0 ) , c = P ( y ) , c for c ≠ c 0 c\neq c_0 c = c 0 , and
P u ( y + m e c 0 , j 0 ) , c 0 = P u ( y ) , c 0 + 1 Ω 0 U ∑ i = y c 0 , j 0 + 1 y c 0 , j 0 + m 1 { U i c 0 , j 0 ≤ u } ( u ≥ 0 ) , \mathsf{P}^{(y+\mathsf{m}e_{c_0,j_0}),c_0}_u=\mathsf{P}^{(y),c_0}_u+\mathbf{1}_{\Omega^{U}_0}\sum_{i=y_{c_0,j_0}+1}^{y_{c_0,j_0}+\mathsf{m}}\mathbf{1}\{U^{c_0,j_0}_i\le u\}\qquad(u\ge0), P u ( y + m e c 0 , j 0 ) , c 0 = P u ( y ) , c 0 + 1 Ω 0 U ∑ i = y c 0 , j 0 + 1 y c 0 , j 0 + m 1 { U i c 0 , j 0 ≤ u } ( u ≥ 0 ) ,
where on Ω 0 U \Omega^{U}_0 Ω 0 U the m \mathsf{m} m inserted points U i c 0 , j 0 U^{c_0,j_0}_i U i c 0 , j 0 (y c 0 , j 0 < i ≤ y c 0 , j 0 + m y_{c_0,j_0}<i\le y_{c_0,j_0}+\mathsf{m} y c 0 , j 0 < i ≤ y c 0 , j 0 + m ) lie in I c 0 , j 0 I_{c_0,j_0} I c 0 , j 0 , are pairwise distinct, and differ from every point U i ′ c 0 , j U^{c_0,j}_{i'} U i ′ c 0 , j with 1 ≤ j ≤ J c 0 1\le j\le J_{c_0} 1 ≤ j ≤ J c 0 and 1 ≤ i ′ ≤ y c 0 , j 1\le i'\le y_{c_0,j} 1 ≤ i ′ ≤ y c 0 , j .
3. (Record-driven likelihoods on the copy) The Record-Driven Causal Intensity of the Open-Loop Aggregate Solution: Joint Measurability of the Record-Frozen Control, the Regularised Recursion Path, Non-Anticipation, and Measurability of the Likelihood applies to the probability space ( Ω , U , P ∣ U ) (\Omega,\mathcal{U},P|_{\mathcal{U}}) ( Ω , U , P ∣ U ) with the clocks P ( y ) \mathsf{P}^{(y)} P ( y ) , for each y ∈ N 0 L y\in\mathbb{N}_0^{\mathsf{L}} y ∈ N 0 L , and to ( Ω , F , P ) (\Omega,\mathcal{F},P) ( Ω , F , P ) with the clocks P ♯ \mathsf{P}^{\sharp} P ♯ ; write Σ ˉ ( y ) , r ( ω ) \bar\Sigma^{(y),r}(\omega) Σ ˉ ( y ) , r ( ω ) , λ ( y ) , ω \lambda^{(y),\omega} λ ( y ) , ω , ℓ ( y ) , ω \ell^{(y),\omega} ℓ ( y ) , ω , G ( y ) \mathsf{G}^{(y)} G ( y ) and Σ ˉ ♯ , r ( ω ) \bar\Sigma^{\sharp,r}(\omega) Σ ˉ ♯ , r ( ω ) , λ ♯ , ω \lambda^{\sharp,\omega} λ ♯ , ω , ℓ ♯ , ω \ell^{\sharp,\omega} ℓ ♯ , ω , G ♯ \mathsf{G}^{\sharp} G ♯ for the regularised paths, intensities, likelihoods and conflict-free sets so obtained. Then ( r , ω ) ↦ ℓ ( y ) , ω ( r ) (r,\omega)\mapsto\ell^{(y),\omega}(r) ( r , ω ) ↦ ℓ ( y ) , ω ( r ) is R ⊗ U \mathcal{R}\otimes\mathcal{U} R ⊗ U -measurable, ( r , ω ) ↦ ℓ ♯ , ω ( r ) (r,\omega)\mapsto\ell^{\sharp,\omega}(r) ( r , ω ) ↦ ℓ ♯ , ω ( r ) is R ⊗ F \mathcal{R}\otimes\mathcal{F} R ⊗ F -measurable, both take values in [ 0 , ( N B ~ ) k ] [0,(N\tilde{B})^{k}] [ 0 , ( N B ~ ) k ] on R ( k ) \mathbf{R}^{(k)} R ( k ) and integrate to 1 1 1 against ρ \rho ρ for every ω \omega ω , and for every ω ∈ Ω \omega\in\Omega ω ∈ Ω , with y = K ( ω ) y=\mathsf{K}(\omega) y = K ( ω ) : Σ ˉ t ♯ , r ( ω ) = Σ ˉ t ( y ) , r ( ω ) \bar\Sigma^{\sharp,r}_t(\omega)=\bar\Sigma^{(y),r}_t(\omega) Σ ˉ t ♯ , r ( ω ) = Σ ˉ t ( y ) , r ( ω ) for all r r r and t t t , ℓ ♯ , ω = ℓ ( y ) , ω \ell^{\sharp,\omega}=\ell^{(y),\omega} ℓ ♯ , ω = ℓ ( y ) , ω , and ( r , ω ) ∈ G ♯ (r,\omega)\in\mathsf{G}^{\sharp} ( r , ω ) ∈ G ♯ if and only if ( r , ω ) ∈ G ( y ) (r,\omega)\in\mathsf{G}^{(y)} ( r , ω ) ∈ G ( y ) .
The copy. With the likelihoods of claim 3 and N \sqrt{N} N the nonnegative square root , the synthetic copy is the triple ( Ω ♯ , F ♯ , μ ♯ ) (\Omega^{\sharp},\mathcal{F}^{\sharp},\mu^{\sharp}) ( Ω ♯ , F ♯ , μ ♯ ) with Ω ♯ = Ω × R d × R \Omega^{\sharp}=\Omega\times\mathbb{R}^d\times\mathbf{R} Ω ♯ = Ω × R d × R , F ♯ = ( F ⊗ B ( R d ) ) ⊗ R \mathcal{F}^{\sharp}=(\mathcal{F}\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^d))\otimes\mathcal{R} F ♯ = ( F ⊗ B ( R d )) ⊗ R , and μ ♯ \mu^{\sharp} μ ♯ the measure with density
q ♯ ( ω , θ , r ) = φ η ( θ − K ( ω ) / N ) ℓ ♯ , ω ( r ) \mathsf{q}^{\sharp}(\omega,\theta,r)=\varphi_\eta\bigl(\theta-\mathsf{K}(\omega)/\sqrt{N}\bigr)\,\ell^{\sharp,\omega}(r) q ♯ ( ω , θ , r ) = φ η ( θ − K ( ω ) / N ) ℓ ♯ , ω ( r )
(F ♯ \mathcal{F}^{\sharp} F ♯ -measurable by claim 4 below) with respect to the reference measure ( P ⊗ λ d ) ⊗ ρ (P\otimes\lambda_d)\otimes\rho ( P ⊗ λ d ) ⊗ ρ (which exists, P P P being finite and λ d \lambda_d λ d and ρ \rho ρ being σ \sigma σ -finite). Its coordinate maps are the parameter Θ ( ω , θ , r ) = θ \Theta(\omega,\theta,r)=\theta Θ ( ω , θ , r ) = θ and the record D ( ω , θ , r ) = r \mathsf{D}(\omega,\theta,r)=r D ( ω , θ , r ) = r . The parameter lattice is S = { y / N : y ∈ N 0 L } ⊆ R d \mathsf{S}=\{y/\sqrt{N}:y\in\mathbb{N}_0^{\mathsf{L}}\}\subseteq\mathbb{R}^d S = { y / N : y ∈ N 0 L } ⊆ R d , the count mass function is p : R d → [ 0 , 1 ] \mathsf{p}:\mathbb{R}^d\to[0,1] p : R d → [ 0 , 1 ] , p ( x ) = P ( K = N x ) \mathsf{p}(x)=P(\mathsf{K}=\sqrt{N}x) p ( x ) = P ( K = N x ) for x ∈ S x\in\mathsf{S} x ∈ S and p ( x ) = 0 \mathsf{p}(x)=0 p ( x ) = 0 otherwise, and the record kernel is f : S × R → [ 0 , ∞ ) f:\mathsf{S}\times\mathbf{R}\to[0,\infty) f : S × R → [ 0 , ∞ ) , f ( x , r ) = E [ ℓ ( N x ) , ⋅ ( r ) ] f(x,r)=\mathbb{E}\bigl[\ell^{(\sqrt{N}x),\cdot}(r)\bigr] f ( x , r ) = E [ ℓ ( N x ) , ⋅ ( r ) ] .
4. (The copy is a probability space) q ♯ \mathsf{q}^{\sharp} q ♯ is F ♯ \mathcal{F}^{\sharp} F ♯ -measurable with values in [ 0 , ∞ ) [0,\infty) [ 0 , ∞ ) , and μ ♯ \mu^{\sharp} μ ♯ is a probability measure on ( Ω ♯ , F ♯ ) (\Omega^{\sharp},\mathcal{F}^{\sharp}) ( Ω ♯ , F ♯ ) . The maps Θ \Theta Θ and D \mathsf{D} D are measurable from F ♯ \mathcal{F}^{\sharp} F ♯ to B ( R d ) \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^d) B ( R d ) and to R \mathcal{R} R respectively.
5. (Smoothed joint density of parameter and record) S \mathsf{S} S is countable in the sense of Assembly of Measure Spaces: Restriction, Transport, One-Point Spaces, and Countable Disjoint Unions ; p \mathsf{p} p is a discrete probability mass function on R d \mathbb{R}^d R d with support { x : p ( x ) > 0 } = S \{x:\mathsf{p}(x)>0\}=\mathsf{S} { x : p ( x ) > 0 } = S and ∑ x ∈ S p ( x ) ∥ x ∥ ≤ l ( l − 1 ) R / N < ∞ \sum_{x\in\mathsf{S}}\mathsf{p}(x)\lVert x\rVert\le l(l-1)R/\sqrt{N}<\infty ∑ x ∈ S p ( x ) ∥ x ∥ ≤ l ( l − 1 ) R / N < ∞ ; and the kernel f f f satisfies conditions (K1) and (K2) of Gaussian Smoothing of a Kernel-Weighted Discrete Family with Countable Support: Joint Density, van Trees Regularity, and the Symmetrised Directional Score Bound , the latter with the R \mathcal{R} R -measurable majorant M ( r ) = ( N B ~ ) k M(r)=(N\tilde{B})^{k} M ( r ) = ( N B ~ ) k for r ∈ R ( k ) r\in\mathbf{R}^{(k)} r ∈ R ( k ) (with ( N B ~ ) 0 = 1 (N\tilde{B})^{0}=1 ( N B ~ ) 0 = 1 ). Consequently all hypotheses of Gaussian Smoothing of a Kernel-Weighted Discrete Family with Countable Support: Joint Density, van Trees Regularity, and the Symmetrised Directional Score Bound on ( d , η , p , f ) (d,\eta,\mathsf{p},f) ( d , η , p , f ) hold, and its claims 1 to 3 are available for every natural number n ≥ 1 n\ge1 n ≥ 1 , every choice of moves a 1 , … , a n ∈ R d a_1,\dots,a_n\in\mathbb{R}^d a 1 , … , a n ∈ R d with x + a q ∈ S x+a_q\in\mathsf{S} x + a q ∈ S for all x ∈ S x\in\mathsf{S} x ∈ S and all q q q (for instance a q = m q e c q , j q / N a_q=\mathsf{m}_qe_{c_q,j_q}/\sqrt{N} a q = m q e c q , j q / N with m q ∈ N \mathsf{m}_q\in\mathbb{N} m q ∈ N and ( c q , j q ) ∈ L (c_q,j_q)\in\mathsf{L} ( c q , j q ) ∈ L ), and every choice of weights w ∈ R n w\in\mathbb{R}^n w ∈ R n . Moreover the smoothed joint density g g g of that lemma, g ( θ , r ) = ∑ x ∈ S p ( x ) φ η ( θ − x ) f ( x , r ) g(\theta,r)=\sum_{x\in\mathsf{S}}\mathsf{p}(x)\varphi_\eta(\theta-x)f(x,r) g ( θ , r ) = ∑ x ∈ S p ( x ) φ η ( θ − x ) f ( x , r ) , satisfies
g ( θ , r ) = E [ φ η ( θ − K / N ) ℓ ♯ , ⋅ ( r ) ] for all ( θ , r ) ∈ R d × R , g(\theta,r)=\mathbb{E}\bigl[\varphi_\eta(\theta-\mathsf{K}/\sqrt{N})\,\ell^{\sharp,\cdot}(r)\bigr]\qquad\text{for all }(\theta,r)\in\mathbb{R}^d\times\mathbf{R}, g ( θ , r ) = E [ φ η ( θ − K / N ) ℓ ♯ , ⋅ ( r ) ] for all ( θ , r ) ∈ R d × R ,
and is the joint density of ( Θ , D ) (\Theta,\mathsf{D}) ( Θ , D ) under μ ♯ \mu^{\sharp} μ ♯ : for every F : R d × R → [ 0 , ∞ ] F:\mathbb{R}^d\times\mathbf{R}\to[0,\infty] F : R d × R → [ 0 , ∞ ] measurable with respect to B ( R d ) ⊗ R \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^d)\otimes\mathcal{R} B ( R d ) ⊗ R ,
∫ Ω ♯ F ( Θ , D ) d μ ♯ = ∫ R d × R F g d ( λ d ⊗ ρ ) in [ 0 , ∞ ] . \int_{\Omega^{\sharp}}F(\Theta,\mathsf{D})\,d\mu^{\sharp}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^d\times\mathbf{R}}F\,g\,d(\lambda_d\otimes\rho)\qquad\text{in }[0,\infty]. ∫ Ω ♯ F ( Θ , D ) d μ ♯ = ∫ R d × R F g d ( λ d ⊗ ρ ) in [ 0 , ∞ ] .