TheoremBase

The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record

Statement

Adopt the setting and notation of The Record-Driven Causal Intensity of the Open-Loop Aggregate Solution: Joint Measurability of the Record-Frozen Control, the Regularised Recursion Path, Non-Anticipation, and Measurability of the Likelihood: natural numbers N≥1N\ge1, l≥2l\ge2, m≥1m\ge1, l~≥1\tilde{l}\ge1, the control set A⊆Rm\mathcal{A}\subseteq\mathbb{R}^m, real numbers B≥0B\ge0, B~≥0\tilde{B}\ge0 and T>0T>0, the transition-rate family β\beta, the observation-rate family β~\tilde\beta with aggregate observation drift b~\tilde{b}, the aggregate lattice GN\mathbb{G}_N and the point x0∈GNx_0\in\mathbb{G}_N, the transition labels cc (the ordered pairs (σ,γ)(\sigma,\gamma) of distinct elements of {1,…,l}\{1,\dots,l\}, of which there are l(l−1)l(l-1)), the observation record space (R,R,ρ)(\mathbf{R},\mathcal{R},\rho) with horizon TT and l~\tilde{l} channels, with cells C∅C_\emptyset and Ck,vC_{k,v} and with R(k)\mathbf{R}^{(k)} the set of records with exactly kk events (the measure ρ\rho is σ\sigma-finite: there are countably many cells, ρ(C∅)=1\rho(C_\emptyset)=1, and ρ(Ck,v)\rho(C_{k,v}) is the volume of the ordered time simplex Dk(T)D_k(T), which is finite), and the observation-driven control policy hh with values in A\mathcal{A}, with record-frozen control paths ara^r. Let N\mathbb{N} be the set of natural numbers and N0=N∪{0}\mathbb{N}_0=\mathbb{N}\cup\{0\}. Let R>0R>0 be a real number with R≥NBTR\ge NBT, and for every transition label cc let Jc≥1J_c\ge1 be a natural number and 0=b0c<b1c<⋯<bJcc=R0=b^{c}_0<b^{c}_1<\dots<b^{c}_{J_c}=R real numbers; the cells of the clock cc are the intervals Ic,j=(bj−1c,bjc]I_{c,j}=(b^{c}_{j-1},b^{c}_j], 1≤j≤Jc1\le j\le J_c, of lengths ∣Ic,j∣=bjc−bj−1c|I_{c,j}|=b^{c}_j-b^{c}_{j-1}. Let L\mathsf{L} be the set of all pairs (c,j)(c,j) with cc a transition label and 1≤j≤Jc1\le j\le J_c, a finite set with d=∑cJc≥1d=\sum_{c}J_c\ge1 elements; fix a bijection of L\mathsf{L} with {1,…,d}\{1,\dots,d\} and index the coordinates of points of Euclidean space Rd\mathbb{R}^d by L\mathsf{L}, writing ec,je_{c,j} for the standard basis vector of the coordinate (c,j)(c,j) and N0L⊆Rd\mathbb{N}_0^{\mathsf{L}}\subseteq\mathbb{R}^d for the set of points with all coordinates in N0\mathbb{N}_0. Let η\eta be a real number with 0<η≤10<\eta\le1 and let φη\varphi_\eta be the Gaussian smoothing weight on Rd\mathbb{R}^d. Write poiμ(k)=exp⁡(−μ)μk/k!\mathrm{poi}_\mu(k)=\exp(-\mu)\mu^{k}/k! (k∈N0k\in\mathbb{N}_0, μ≥0\mu\ge0) for the mass function of the Poisson distribution with parameter μ\mu, with the exponential function exp⁡\exp; B(Rd)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^d) for the Borel σ\sigma-algebra and λd\lambda_d for Lebesgue measure on Rd\mathbb{R}^d; ⊗\otimes for product σ\sigma-algebras and product measures, triple products always being written with explicit parentheses; E\mathbb{E} for the expectation on (Ω,F,P)(\Omega,\mathcal{F},P), extended to [0,∞][0,\infty]-valued measurable maps as their integrals with respect to PP; 1{⋅}\mathbf{1}\{\cdot\} for the indicator of an event; and ∥⋅∥\lVert\cdot\rVert for the Euclidean norm.

The driving variables. Let (Ω,F,P)(\Omega,\mathcal{F},P) be a probability space carrying an independent family of random variables Kc (c a label),Vic (c a label, i∈N),Uic,j ((c,j)∈L, i∈N),K^{c}\ (c\text{ a label}),\qquad V^{c}_i\ (c\text{ a label},\ i\in\mathbb{N}),\qquad U^{c,j}_i\ ((c,j)\in\mathsf{L},\ i\in\mathbb{N}), where KcK^{c} has the Poisson distribution with parameter RR, VicV^{c}_i has the uniform law on (0,R](0,R] and Uic,jU^{c,j}_i has the uniform law on Ic,jI_{c,j}, in the sense of Uniform Representation of the Rate-One Poisson Counting Path on a Bounded Interval: Distinct Points, Poisson Increments, Conditional Law Given the Cell Counts, and Point Insertion; such a space exists by Existence of Independent Sequences with Prescribed Distributions. For each label cc, the variables KcK^{c}, (Vic)i(V^{c}_i)_i, (Uic,j)j,i(U^{c,j}_i)_{j,i} (an independent family, as a subfamily of an independent family) with the cells Ic,1,…,Ic,JcI_{c,1},\dots,I_{c,J_c} form the data of Uniform Representation of the Rate-One Poisson Counting Path on a Bounded Interval: Distinct Points, Poisson Increments, Conditional Law Given the Cell Counts, and Point Insertion; let K~c\widetilde{K}^{c}, the uniform Poisson path pcp^{c}, the deterministic-count paths pc,(y)p^{c,(y)} (y∈N0Jcy\in\mathbb{N}_0^{J_c}), the cell counts (written Kc,j\mathsf{K}_{c,j} here, 1≤j≤Jc1\le j\le J_c; they are the CjC_j of that lemma, a symbol reserved here for the cells Ck,vC_{k,v} of the record space) and the event Ω0c\Omega^{c}_0 be the corresponding objects of that lemma. Let V\mathcal{V} be the σ\sigma-algebra generated by all KcK^{c} and VicV^{c}_i, let U\mathcal{U} be the σ\sigma-algebra generated by all Uic,jU^{c,j}_i, let Ω0U\Omega^{U}_0 be the event that for every label cc the points Uic,jU^{c,j}_i (1≤j≤Jc1\le j\le J_c, i∈Ni\in\mathbb{N}) are pairwise distinct with Uic,j∈Ic,jU^{c,j}_i\in I_{c,j}, and let K:Ω→N0L\mathsf{K}:\Omega\to\mathbb{N}_0^{\mathsf{L}} be the cell-count vector with coordinates Kc,j\mathsf{K}_{c,j}.

The clocks. For y∈N0Ly\in\mathbb{N}_0^{\mathsf{L}}, a label cc and u≥0u\ge0 put Pu(y),c=1Ω0U∑j=1Jc∑i=1yc,j1{Uic,j≤u},Pu♯,c(ω)=Pu(K(ω)),c(ω),\mathsf{P}^{(y),c}_u=\mathbf{1}_{\Omega^{U}_0}\sum_{j=1}^{J_c}\sum_{i=1}^{y_{c,j}}\mathbf{1}\{U^{c,j}_i\le u\},\qquad \mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_u(\omega)=\mathsf{P}^{(\mathsf{K}(\omega)),c}_u(\omega), the deterministic-count clocks P(y)=(P(y),c)c\mathsf{P}^{(y)}=(\mathsf{P}^{(y),c})_c and the copy clocks P♯=(P♯,c)c\mathsf{P}^{\sharp}=(\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c})_c.

1. (Independent cell structure) U\mathcal{U} and V\mathcal{V} are independent; Ω0U∈U\Omega^{U}_0\in\mathcal{U} and P(Ω0U)=1P(\Omega^{U}_0)=1; each Kc,j\mathsf{K}_{c,j} is a V\mathcal{V}-measurable random variable with values in N0\mathbb{N}_0 and E[Kc,j]=∣Ic,j∣\mathbb{E}[\mathsf{K}_{c,j}]=|I_{c,j}|; P(K=y)=∏(c,j)∈Lpoi∣Ic,j∣(yc,j)>0P(\mathsf{K}=y)=\prod_{(c,j)\in\mathsf{L}}\mathrm{poi}_{|I_{c,j}|}(y_{c,j})>0 for every y∈N0Ly\in\mathbb{N}_0^{\mathsf{L}}, and ∑y∈N0LP(K=y)=1\sum_{y\in\mathbb{N}_0^{\mathsf{L}}}P(\mathsf{K}=y)=1; and for every y∈N0Ly\in\mathbb{N}_0^{\mathsf{L}} and every U\mathcal{U}-measurable Z:Ω→[0,∞]Z:\Omega\to[0,\infty], E[1{K=y} Z]=P(K=y) E[Z]in [0,∞].\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}\{\mathsf{K}=y\}\,Z\bigr]=P(\mathsf{K}=y)\,\mathbb{E}[Z]\qquad\text{in }[0,\infty].

2. (Clock structure) For every y∈N0Ly\in\mathbb{N}_0^{\mathsf{L}} and every label cc: every path u↦Pu(y),c(ω)u\mapsto\mathsf{P}^{(y),c}_u(\omega) is a counting path, each Pu(y),c\mathsf{P}^{(y),c}_u is U\mathcal{U}-measurable, and Pu(y),c(ω)=puc,(yc,⋅)(ω)\mathsf{P}^{(y),c}_u(\omega)=p^{c,(y_{c,\cdot})}_u(\omega) for ω∈Ω0U\omega\in\Omega^{U}_0 and u∈[0,R]u\in[0,R], where yc,⋅=(yc,1,…,yc,Jc)y_{c,\cdot}=(y_{c,1},\dots,y_{c,J_c}). Every path of P♯,c\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c} is a counting path and each Pu♯,c\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_u is F\mathcal{F}-measurable. For m∈N\mathsf{m}\in\mathbb{N} and (c0,j0)∈L(c_0,j_0)\in\mathsf{L}, one has P(y+mec0,j0),c=P(y),c\mathsf{P}^{(y+\mathsf{m}e_{c_0,j_0}),c}=\mathsf{P}^{(y),c} for c≠c0c\neq c_0, and Pu(y+mec0,j0),c0=Pu(y),c0+1Ω0U∑i=yc0,j0+1yc0,j0+m1{Uic0,j0≤u}(u≥0),\mathsf{P}^{(y+\mathsf{m}e_{c_0,j_0}),c_0}_u=\mathsf{P}^{(y),c_0}_u+\mathbf{1}_{\Omega^{U}_0}\sum_{i=y_{c_0,j_0}+1}^{y_{c_0,j_0}+\mathsf{m}}\mathbf{1}\{U^{c_0,j_0}_i\le u\}\qquad(u\ge0), where on Ω0U\Omega^{U}_0 the m\mathsf{m} inserted points Uic0,j0U^{c_0,j_0}_i (yc0,j0<i≤yc0,j0+my_{c_0,j_0}<i\le y_{c_0,j_0}+\mathsf{m}) lie in Ic0,j0I_{c_0,j_0}, are pairwise distinct, and differ from every point Ui′c0,jU^{c_0,j}_{i'} with 1≤j≤Jc01\le j\le J_{c_0} and 1≤i′≤yc0,j1\le i'\le y_{c_0,j}.

3. (Record-driven likelihoods on the copy) The Record-Driven Causal Intensity of the Open-Loop Aggregate Solution: Joint Measurability of the Record-Frozen Control, the Regularised Recursion Path, Non-Anticipation, and Measurability of the Likelihood applies to the probability space (Ω,U,P∣U)(\Omega,\mathcal{U},P|_{\mathcal{U}}) with the clocks P(y)\mathsf{P}^{(y)}, for each y∈N0Ly\in\mathbb{N}_0^{\mathsf{L}}, and to (Ω,F,P)(\Omega,\mathcal{F},P) with the clocks P♯\mathsf{P}^{\sharp}; write Σˉ(y),r(ω)\bar\Sigma^{(y),r}(\omega), λ(y),ω\lambda^{(y),\omega}, ℓ(y),ω\ell^{(y),\omega}, G(y)\mathsf{G}^{(y)} and Σˉ♯,r(ω)\bar\Sigma^{\sharp,r}(\omega), λ♯,ω\lambda^{\sharp,\omega}, ℓ♯,ω\ell^{\sharp,\omega}, G♯\mathsf{G}^{\sharp} for the regularised paths, intensities, likelihoods and conflict-free sets so obtained. Then (r,ω)↦ℓ(y),ω(r)(r,\omega)\mapsto\ell^{(y),\omega}(r) is R⊗U\mathcal{R}\otimes\mathcal{U}-measurable, (r,ω)↦ℓ♯,ω(r)(r,\omega)\mapsto\ell^{\sharp,\omega}(r) is R⊗F\mathcal{R}\otimes\mathcal{F}-measurable, both take values in [0,(NB~)k][0,(N\tilde{B})^{k}] on R(k)\mathbf{R}^{(k)} and integrate to 11 against ρ\rho for every ω\omega, and for every ω∈Ω\omega\in\Omega, with y=K(ω)y=\mathsf{K}(\omega): Σˉt♯,r(ω)=Σˉt(y),r(ω)\bar\Sigma^{\sharp,r}_t(\omega)=\bar\Sigma^{(y),r}_t(\omega) for all rr and tt, ℓ♯,ω=ℓ(y),ω\ell^{\sharp,\omega}=\ell^{(y),\omega}, and (r,ω)∈G♯(r,\omega)\in\mathsf{G}^{\sharp} if and only if (r,ω)∈G(y)(r,\omega)\in\mathsf{G}^{(y)}.

The copy. With the likelihoods of claim 3 and N\sqrt{N} the nonnegative square root, the synthetic copy is the triple (Ω♯,F♯,μ♯)(\Omega^{\sharp},\mathcal{F}^{\sharp},\mu^{\sharp}) with Ω♯=Ω×Rd×R\Omega^{\sharp}=\Omega\times\mathbb{R}^d\times\mathbf{R}, F♯=(F⊗B(Rd))⊗R\mathcal{F}^{\sharp}=(\mathcal{F}\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^d))\otimes\mathcal{R}, and μ♯\mu^{\sharp} the measure with density q♯(ω,θ,r)=φη(θ−K(ω)/N) ℓ♯,ω(r)\mathsf{q}^{\sharp}(\omega,\theta,r)=\varphi_\eta\bigl(\theta-\mathsf{K}(\omega)/\sqrt{N}\bigr)\,\ell^{\sharp,\omega}(r) (F♯\mathcal{F}^{\sharp}-measurable by claim 4 below) with respect to the reference measure (P⊗λd)⊗ρ(P\otimes\lambda_d)\otimes\rho (which exists, PP being finite and λd\lambda_d and ρ\rho being σ\sigma-finite). Its coordinate maps are the parameter Θ(ω,θ,r)=θ\Theta(\omega,\theta,r)=\theta and the record D(ω,θ,r)=r\mathsf{D}(\omega,\theta,r)=r. The parameter lattice is S={y/N:y∈N0L}⊆Rd\mathsf{S}=\{y/\sqrt{N}:y\in\mathbb{N}_0^{\mathsf{L}}\}\subseteq\mathbb{R}^d, the count mass function is p:Rd→[0,1]\mathsf{p}:\mathbb{R}^d\to[0,1], p(x)=P(K=Nx)\mathsf{p}(x)=P(\mathsf{K}=\sqrt{N}x) for x∈Sx\in\mathsf{S} and p(x)=0\mathsf{p}(x)=0 otherwise, and the record kernel is f:S×R→[0,∞)f:\mathsf{S}\times\mathbf{R}\to[0,\infty), f(x,r)=E[ℓ(Nx),⋅(r)]f(x,r)=\mathbb{E}\bigl[\ell^{(\sqrt{N}x),\cdot}(r)\bigr].

4. (The copy is a probability space) q♯\mathsf{q}^{\sharp} is F♯\mathcal{F}^{\sharp}-measurable with values in [0,∞)[0,\infty), and μ♯\mu^{\sharp} is a probability measure on (Ω♯,F♯)(\Omega^{\sharp},\mathcal{F}^{\sharp}). The maps Θ\Theta and D\mathsf{D} are measurable from F♯\mathcal{F}^{\sharp} to B(Rd)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^d) and to R\mathcal{R} respectively.

5. (Smoothed joint density of parameter and record) S\mathsf{S} is countable in the sense of Assembly of Measure Spaces: Restriction, Transport, One-Point Spaces, and Countable Disjoint Unions; p\mathsf{p} is a discrete probability mass function on Rd\mathbb{R}^d with support {x:p(x)>0}=S\{x:\mathsf{p}(x)>0\}=\mathsf{S} and ∑x∈Sp(x)∥x∥≤l(l−1)R/N<∞\sum_{x\in\mathsf{S}}\mathsf{p}(x)\lVert x\rVert\le l(l-1)R/\sqrt{N}<\infty; and the kernel ff satisfies conditions (K1) and (K2) of Gaussian Smoothing of a Kernel-Weighted Discrete Family with Countable Support: Joint Density, van Trees Regularity, and the Symmetrised Directional Score Bound, the latter with the R\mathcal{R}-measurable majorant M(r)=(NB~)kM(r)=(N\tilde{B})^{k} for r∈R(k)r\in\mathbf{R}^{(k)} (with (NB~)0=1(N\tilde{B})^{0}=1). Consequently all hypotheses of Gaussian Smoothing of a Kernel-Weighted Discrete Family with Countable Support: Joint Density, van Trees Regularity, and the Symmetrised Directional Score Bound on (d,η,p,f)(d,\eta,\mathsf{p},f) hold, and its claims 1 to 3 are available for every natural number n≥1n\ge1, every choice of moves a1,…,an∈Rda_1,\dots,a_n\in\mathbb{R}^d with x+aq∈Sx+a_q\in\mathsf{S} for all x∈Sx\in\mathsf{S} and all qq (for instance aq=mqecq,jq/Na_q=\mathsf{m}_qe_{c_q,j_q}/\sqrt{N} with mq∈N\mathsf{m}_q\in\mathbb{N} and (cq,jq)∈L(c_q,j_q)\in\mathsf{L}), and every choice of weights w∈Rnw\in\mathbb{R}^n. Moreover the smoothed joint density gg of that lemma, g(θ,r)=∑x∈Sp(x)φη(θ−x)f(x,r)g(\theta,r)=\sum_{x\in\mathsf{S}}\mathsf{p}(x)\varphi_\eta(\theta-x)f(x,r), satisfies g(θ,r)=E[φη(θ−K/N) ℓ♯,⋅(r)]for all (θ,r)∈Rd×R,g(\theta,r)=\mathbb{E}\bigl[\varphi_\eta(\theta-\mathsf{K}/\sqrt{N})\,\ell^{\sharp,\cdot}(r)\bigr]\qquad\text{for all }(\theta,r)\in\mathbb{R}^d\times\mathbf{R}, and is the joint density of (Θ,D)(\Theta,\mathsf{D}) under μ♯\mu^{\sharp}: for every F:Rd×R→[0,∞]F:\mathbb{R}^d\times\mathbf{R}\to[0,\infty] measurable with respect to B(Rd)⊗R\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^d)\otimes\mathcal{R}, ∫Ω♯F(Θ,D) dμ♯=∫Rd×RF g d(λd⊗ρ)in [0,∞].\int_{\Omega^{\sharp}}F(\Theta,\mathsf{D})\,d\mu^{\sharp}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^d\times\mathbf{R}}F\,g\,d(\lambda_d\otimes\rho)\qquad\text{in }[0,\infty].

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…