TheoremBase

The Block Cascade of Anchored Good-Set Clocks: Adapted Good Sets, Matched Escape Bounds, and the Energy Ledger

Statement

Adopt the setting, notation and conventions of the extended good-set stopping-time lemma: the affine-controlled transition-rate family (β0,β1)(\beta_{0},\beta_{1}) on ll states with compact convex control set A⊆Rm\mathcal{A}\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{m}, its transition-rate family β\beta with rate bound BB, aggregate state drift bb, state-Lipschitz constant Λb\Lambda_{b}, control bound RR and constant K1K_{1}, and K2=2l (l−1)K1K_{2}=2\sqrt{l}\,(l-1)K_{1}; the horizon T>0T>0; the solution of the controlled NN-agent dynamics with regular event Ω0\Omega_{0}, observation filtration (Gt)t∈[0,T](\mathcal{G}_{t})_{t\in[0,T]} and system filtration (Ftsys)t∈[0,T](\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_{t})_{t\in[0,T]}; the realized control α^\hat{\alpha} of the realized-control lemma; the point x0x_{0} of the probability simplex Δl\Delta^{l}; the realized mean-field flow Φ\Phi; the map S∗:[0,T]→RlS^{*}:[0,T]\to\mathbb{R}^{l} with continuous components and the deviation Yt=∣Φt−St∗∣Y_{t}=|\Phi_{t}-S^{*}_{t}|, ∣⋅∣|\cdot| being the Euclidean norm; the map A:[0,T]→AA:[0,T]\to\mathcal{A} with measurable components and the control energy Et(ω)=∫[0,t]∣α^(s,ω)−As∣2 ds\mathcal{E}_{t}(\omega)=\int_{[0,t]}|\hat{\alpha}(s,\omega)-A_{s}|^{2}\,ds; the real number δ>0\delta>0 and the clipped-out time O\mathcal{O} of that lemma. Stopping times are those of whichever of (Gt)t∈[0,T](\mathcal{G}_{t})_{t\in[0,T]} and (Ftsys)t∈[0,T](\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_{t})_{t\in[0,T]} is named; E\mathbb{E} is the expectation; 1D\mathbf{1}_{D} is the function equal to 11 on a set DD and 00 off it; ∫[0,t]⋅ ds\int_{[0,t]}\cdot\,ds is the Lebesgue integral over a compact interval; exp⁡\exp is the exponential function and ⋅\sqrt{\cdot} the nonnegative square root. Set Ca=l el ΛbTC_{a}=\sqrt{l}\,e^{\sqrt{l}\,\Lambda_{b}T}, the constant of the anchored good-set clocks lemma.

Standing hypothesis on S∗S^{*}. Assume, as in claim 4 of the extended good-set stopping-time lemma and of the anchored good-set clocks lemma, that S∗S^{*} takes values in Δl\Delta^{l}, that S0∗=x0S^{*}_{0}=x_{0}, and that St∗γ=x0γ+∫[0,t]bγ(Ss∗,As) dsS^{*\gamma}_{t}=x^{\gamma}_{0}+\int_{[0,t]}b^{\gamma}(S^{*}_{s},A_{s})\,ds for all t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T] and γ∈{1,…,l}\gamma\in\{1,\dots,l\}.

Block and level data. Let T0T_{0} be a real number with 0<T0≤T0<T_{0}\le T, let KK be the least natural number with K T0≥TK\,T_{0}\ge T (which exists by the Archimedean property), and put tk=min⁡(k T0,T)t_{k}=\min(k\,T_{0},T) for k∈{0,1,…,K}k\in\{0,1,\dots,K\} and hk=tk+1−tkh_{k}=t_{k+1}-t_{k} for k∈{0,…,K−1}k\in\{0,\dots,K-1\}. Let ε1>0\varepsilon_{1}>0, λc>0\lambda_{c}>0 and λo>0\lambda_{o}>0 be real numbers, and for k∈{0,…,K−1}k\in\{0,\dots,K-1\} set

Lk=(2Ca)k+1−K ε1,cE(k)=Lk2λc,θout(k)=Lk2δ2λo,Λ⋆=max⁡(4 Ca2K22 T0, λc, λo).L_{k}=(2C_{a})^{k+1-K}\,\varepsilon_{1},\qquad c^{(k)}_{\mathcal{E}}=\frac{L_{k}^{2}}{\lambda_{c}},\qquad \theta^{(k)}_{\mathrm{out}}=\frac{L_{k}^{2}}{\delta^{2}\lambda_{o}},\qquad \Lambda_{\star}=\max\bigl(4\,C_{a}^{2}K_{2}^{2}\,T_{0},\ \lambda_{c},\ \lambda_{o}\bigr).

The cascade of clocks. For k∈{0,…,K−1}k\in\{0,\dots,K-1\} let σ(k)\sigma^{(k)} be the anchored good-set clock of the anchored good-set clocks lemma with anchor tkt_{k} and level LkL_{k}, formed for the instance of the setting above in which the energy threshold is cE(k)c^{(k)}_{\mathcal{E}} and the clipped-out threshold is θout(k)\theta^{(k)}_{\mathrm{out}}, all other data — the rate family, the horizon, the solution, the realized control, the point x0x_{0}, the flow Φ\Phi, the map S∗S^{*}, the deviation YY, the map AA, the energy E\mathcal{E}, the real δ\delta and the clipped-out time O\mathcal{O} — being those fixed above and independent of the two thresholds. Define the good sets and the leave events by

G0=Ω0,Gk+1=Gk∩{σ(k)≥tk+1},Dk=Gk∩{σ(k)<tk+1}(k∈{0,…,K−1}),G_{0}=\Omega_{0},\qquad G_{k+1}=G_{k}\cap\{\sigma^{(k)}\ge t_{k+1}\},\qquad D_{k}=G_{k}\cap\{\sigma^{(k)}<t_{k+1}\}\qquad(k\in\{0,\dots,K-1\}),

and the block energy increments ΔkE=Emin⁡(σ(k), tk+1)−Etk\Delta_{k}\mathcal{E}=\mathcal{E}_{\min(\sigma^{(k)},\,t_{k+1})}-\mathcal{E}_{t_{k}}, each a random variable with values in [0,4R2hk][0,4R^{2}h_{k}] by claim 6 of the anchored clocks lemma.

Then the following hold.

1. (Grid.) K≥1K\ge1, t0=0t_{0}=0, tK=Tt_{K}=T, and 0<hk≤T00<h_{k}\le T_{0} with tk<tk+1t_{k}<t_{k+1} for every k∈{0,…,K−1}k\in\{0,\dots,K-1\}. Moreover 0<Lk≤ε10<L_{k}\le\varepsilon_{1}, LK−1=ε1L_{K-1}=\varepsilon_{1}, and Lk=2CaLk−1L_{k}=2C_{a}L_{k-1} for k∈{1,…,K−1}k\in\{1,\dots,K-1\}; and 2Ca>12C_{a}>1.

2. (Adaptedness and partition.) Each σ(k)\sigma^{(k)} is a stopping time of (Gt)t∈[0,T](\mathcal{G}_{t})_{t\in[0,T]} and of (Ftsys)t∈[0,T](\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_{t})_{t\in[0,T]} with values in [tk,T][t_{k},T]. For every k∈{0,…,K}k\in\{0,\dots,K\} the set GkG_{k} is an event belonging to Ftksys\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_{t_{k}}, and G0⊇G1⊇⋯⊇GKG_{0}\supseteq G_{1}\supseteq\dots\supseteq G_{K}. For every k∈{0,…,K−1}k\in\{0,\dots,K-1\} the leave event DkD_{k} satisfies Dk⊆Ω0D_{k}\subseteq\Omega_{0} and Dk∈Fσ(k)D_{k}\in\mathcal{F}_{\sigma^{(k)}}, the σ\sigma-algebra of events prior to σ(k)\sigma^{(k)} for (Ftsys)t∈[0,T](\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_{t})_{t\in[0,T]}. The sets D0,…,DK−1,GKD_{0},\dots,D_{K-1},G_{K} are pairwise disjoint with union Ω0\Omega_{0}.

3. (Entry caps.) For every k∈{0,…,K−1}k\in\{0,\dots,K-1\},

Gk ⊆ {Ytk≤Lk2Ca} ⊆ {Ytk<Lk}.G_{k}\ \subseteq\ \Bigl\{Y_{t_{k}}\le\frac{L_{k}}{2C_{a}}\Bigr\}\ \subseteq\ \{Y_{t_{k}}<L_{k}\}.

4. (Matched escape bound.) For every k∈{0,…,K−1}k\in\{0,\dots,K-1\},

Lk2 P(Dk) ≤ Λ⋆ E[1Gk ΔkE].L_{k}^{2}\,P(D_{k})\ \le\ \Lambda_{\star}\,\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{G_{k}}\,\Delta_{k}\mathcal{E}\bigr].

5. (Energy telescope.) ∑k=0K−1E[1Gk ΔkE] ≤ E[1Ω0 ET].\displaystyle\sum_{k=0}^{K-1}\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{G_{k}}\,\Delta_{k}\mathcal{E}\bigr]\ \le\ \mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_{0}}\,\mathcal{E}_{T}\bigr].

6. (The ledger.) Assume in addition:

(EB) (Tracked energy bound.) C†C_{\dagger} is a real number with

N∑k=0K−1E[1Gk ΔkE] ≤ C†.N\sum_{k=0}^{K-1}\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{G_{k}}\,\Delta_{k}\mathcal{E}\bigr]\ \le\ C_{\dagger}.

By claim 5 it is sufficient — but not necessary — that N E[1Ω0ET]≤C†N\,\mathbb{E}[\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_{0}}\mathcal{E}_{T}]\le C_{\dagger}; the left-hand side above counts only the energy accrued while the path is still tracked, and is the quantity the applications bound.

Then C†≥0C_{\dagger}\ge0 and

∑k=0K−1N Lk2 P(Dk) ≤ Λ⋆ C†,∑k=0K−1N  P(Dk)3/4 ≤ (Λ⋆C†)3/4 N−1/4 ΞK,\sum_{k=0}^{K-1}N\,L_{k}^{2}\,P(D_{k})\ \le\ \Lambda_{\star}\,C_{\dagger},\qquad\qquad \sum_{k=0}^{K-1}\sqrt{N}\;P(D_{k})^{3/4}\ \le\ \bigl(\Lambda_{\star}C_{\dagger}\bigr)^{3/4}\,N^{-1/4}\,\Xi_{K},

where x3/4=(x1/4)3x^{3/4}=(x^{1/4})^{3} for x≥0x\ge0 as in the restricted moments lemma and

ΞK=∑k=0K−1Lk−3/2=ε1−3/2 (2Ca)3K/2−1(2Ca)3/2−1,\Xi_{K}=\sum_{k=0}^{K-1}L_{k}^{-3/2}=\varepsilon_{1}^{-3/2}\,\frac{(2C_{a})^{3K/2}-1}{(2C_{a})^{3/2}-1},

where, x1/2x^{1/2} denoting the nonnegative square root, x3/2=(x1/2)3x^{3/2}=(x^{1/2})^{3} for x≥0x\ge0, and, for x>0x>0, x−3/2x^{-3/2} and x−1/4x^{-1/4} are the reciprocals of x3/2x^{3/2} and of x1/4x^{1/4} respectively.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…