TheoremBase

Forward Invariance of the Probability Simplex under the Projected Drift

Statement

Let (β0,β1)(\beta_0,\beta_1) be an affine-controlled transition-rate family on ll states with control set A⊆Rm\mathcal{A}\subseteq\mathbb{R}^m, let β\beta be its transition-rate family with rate bound BB, aggregate state drift bb and projected drift b^\hat{b}, let Δl\Delta^l be the probability simplex, and let T>0T>0 be a real number.

Let A:[0,T]→AA:[0,T]\to\mathcal{A} be a map whose components A1,…,Am:[0,T]→RA^1,\dots,A^m:[0,T]\to\mathbb{R} are measurable with respect to the trace Borel σ\sigma-algebra on [0,T][0,T] and the Borel σ\sigma-algebra on the real line, and let x:[0,T]→Rlx:[0,T]\to\mathbb{R}^l be a continuous map — the interval [0,T][0,T] regarded as a subset of the real line with the absolute value metric and Rl\mathbb{R}^l carrying the Euclidean distance — with x0∈Δlx_0\in\Delta^l such that

xtγ=x0γ+∫[0,t]b^γ(xs,As) dsfor all t∈[0,T] and all γ∈{1,…,l}.x^\gamma_t=x^\gamma_0+\int_{[0,t]}\hat{b}^\gamma(x_s,A_s)\,ds\qquad\text{for all }t\in[0,T]\text{ and all }\gamma\in\{1,\dots,l\} .

The integrands here are measurable and bounded, so the Lebesgue integrals exist; this is verified in the proof.

Then xt∈Δlx_t\in\Delta^l for every t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T], and consequently b^(xt,At)=b(xt,At)\hat{b}(x_t,A_t)=b(x_t,A_t) for every t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T].

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…