Reason: First published version. The optimal control set is a nonempty compact sublevel set, the trajectory distance to it is attained, is Lipschitz in the uniform deviation of the flows and sequentially continuous, and near-optimal controls have trajectories uniformly close to optimal ones.
1. (Structure of the optimal control set.)Mσ∗={ξ∈UA:F(σ,ξ)≤Jσ∗}; the set Mσ∗ is nonempty; it is closed in the topological space whose underlying set is UA and whose open sets are the subsets open in (UA,ρ); and it is a compact and sequentially compact subset of (UA,ρ).
2. (Deviation from the optimal set.) For all x0∈Δl and ξ,ζ∈UA the supremum Ψ(x0,ξ,ζ) exists. Moreover, for all x0∈Δl and ξ∈UA there is ζ†∈Mσ∗ with
Ψ(x0,ξ,ζ†)≤Ψ(x0,ξ,ζ)for every ζ∈Mσ∗,
and the value Ψ(x0,ξ,ζ†) is the same for every ζ†∈Mσ∗ with this property. Write D(x0,ξ) for that common value. Then 0≤D(x0,ξ) for all x0∈Δl and ξ∈UA, and D(σ,ξ∗)=0 for every ξ∗∈Mσ∗.
3. (Comparison estimate.) Let x0,x0′∈Δl and ξ,ξ′∈UA. Then the supremum
Θ=sup{St(x0,ξ)−St(x0′,ξ′):t∈[0,T]}
exists and D(x0,ξ)−D(x0′,ξ′)≤Θ.
4. (Sequential continuity of the deviation.) Let ((x0j,ξj))j∈N be a sequence in X that converges to (x0,ξ)∈X in (X,dX). Then the real sequence (D(x0j,ξj))j∈N has limitD(x0,ξ).
5. (Separation of near-optimal controls.) For every real ε>0 there is a real η>0 such that every ξ∈UA satisfying F(σ,ξ)≤Jσ∗+η satisfies D(σ,ξ)<ε.
Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.