TheoremBase

Well-Posedness for Polynomial Sources in the Quadratic Control Problem on Unitary Laws

A source given by the real part of a finite combination of word moments is Gamma-Lipschitz in the gauge distance with an explicit Gamma, so the quadratic control equation is well posed with a Gamma/rho-Lipschitz solution when Gamma is at most rho beta2/(4K)beta^2/(4K).

Statement

In the setting of Unitary Laws with Free Unitary Noise: Standing Data, with the conventions of Unitary Laws with Free Unitary Noise: Standing Data §spaces, let W2dW_{2d} be as in Words in Unitary Letters: Generators, Signs, Inverse Letters, Lengths and Adjoint Words with lengths ∣w∣|w|, let HQH_{Q} be the quadratic control Hamiltonian, ρ,β\rho,\beta the constants, and KK a trilinear constant. Let C\mathbb{C} be the complex numbers with modulus ∣z∣|z| and real part Re⁡z\operatorname{Re}z. Suppose that the source is

f(λ)=Re⁡∑w∈Sγw λ(w)(λ∈Ld)f(\lambda)=\operatorname{Re}\sum_{w\in S}\gamma_{w}\,\lambda(w)\qquad(\lambda\in\mathcal{L}_{d})

for a nonempty finite set S⊆W2dS\subseteq W_{2d} of nonempty words and complex numbers γw\gamma_{w}, w∈Sw\in S, and put

Γ=∑w∈S∣γw∣ (∣w∣+1)2 sw,\Gamma=\sum_{w\in S}|\gamma_{w}|\,(|w|+1)^{2}\,s_{w},

where, for ww of length k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}, sws_{w} is the nonnegative square root, given by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root, of the natural power (6144 d)k(6144\,d)^{k}.

1. (Lipschitz source) ∣f(μ)−f(ν)∣≤Γ dL(μ,ν)|f(\mu)-f(\nu)|\le\Gamma\,d_{\mathcal{L}}(\mu,\nu) for all μ,ν∈Ld\mu,\nu\in\mathcal{L}_{d}.

2. (Well-posedness) If Γ≤ρβ2/(4K)\Gamma\le\rho\beta^{2}/(4K), then The Discounted Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation on Unitary Laws with Free Unitary Noise §equation with Hamiltonian HQH_{Q} has exactly one viscosity solution VV, and ∣V(μ)−V(ν)∣≤(Γ/ρ) dL(μ,ν)|V(\mu)-V(\nu)|\le(\Gamma/\rho)\,d_{\mathcal{L}}(\mu,\nu) for all μ,ν∈Ld\mu,\nu\in\mathcal{L}_{d}.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…