TheoremBase

Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball

lemmaAnalysisMultivariable Calculuslem:cutoff-second-moment-test-functions-2026a
byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Statement flagged by 0 users
Reason: Goal 3C Batch A: scaled cutoffs and second-moment test functions with uniform derivative bounds. · 2,981 chars · 10 deps · depth 21

Rescaling a smooth bump function by a radius R gives smooth compactly supported cutoffs whose first and second partial derivatives are bounded by constants times 1/R and 1/R^2; multiplying the cutoff by half the squared norm gives smooth compactly supported functions whose gradient is bounded by a constant times the norm, whose second derivatives are uniformly bounded, and which agree with half the squared norm on the ball of radius R.

Statement

Adopt Differential Calculus and Convexity on Euclidean Open Sets: Standing Notation and fix a dimension qq. Smoothness of a function RqR\mathbb{R}^{q}\to\mathbb{R} is that of Smooth Map on a Euclidean Open Set on Rq\mathbb{R}^{q}, which is open by claim 1 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous; compact support is that of Compactly Supported Real-Valued Function for the topology of the open subsets of Rq\mathbb{R}^{q} (Metric Open Sets Form a Topology and Euclidean Openness Agrees with Metric Openness on Rn\mathbb{R}^n); and Δf=i=1qiif\Delta f=\sum_{i=1}^{q}\partial_{i}\partial_{i}f is the Laplacian of a function ff of class C2C^{2} on Rq\mathbb{R}^{q}. For i,j[q]i,j\in[q], δij\delta_{ij} denotes the entry in row ii and column jj of the identity matrix IqI_{q}, so δij=1\delta_{ij}=1 if i=ji=j and δij=0\delta_{ij}=0 otherwise; t2\tfrac{t}{2} is as in Differential Calculus and Convexity on Euclidean Open Sets: Standing Notation §convexity; and ι(q)\iota(q), abbreviated qq where a real number is required, is the image of qq in R\mathbb{R} under the canonical map of The Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to a Field, so that qM=ι(q)MqM=\iota(q)M for a real number MM.

Let χ:RqR\chi:\mathbb{R}^{q}\to\mathbb{R} be smooth with 0χ(x)10\le\chi(x)\le1 for every xx, χ(x)=1\chi(x)=1 whenever x1\lVert x\rVert\le1 and χ(x)=0\chi(x)=0 whenever x2\lVert x\rVert\ge2; such a function exists by Existence of a Smooth Plateau Function on Euclidean Space with x0=0Rqx_{0}=0_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}, r=1r=1 and s=2s=2, since x0Rq=x\lVert x-0_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}\rVert=\lVert x\rVert. For every positive real number RR define χR,ψR:RqR\chi_{R},\psi_{R}:\mathbb{R}^{q}\to\mathbb{R} by

χR(x)=χ(R1x),ψR(x)=12χR(x)x2.\chi_{R}(x)=\chi\bigl(R^{-1}x\bigr),\qquad \psi_{R}(x)=\tfrac{1}{2}\,\chi_{R}(x)\,\lVert x\rVert^{2}.

1. (Cutoffs) For every positive RR the function χR\chi_{R} is smooth and compactly supported, 0χR(x)10\le\chi_{R}(x)\le1 for every xx, χR(x)=1\chi_{R}(x)=1 whenever xR\lVert x\rVert\le R, and χR(x)=0\chi_{R}(x)=0 whenever x2R\lVert x\rVert\ge2R. Moreover there are nonnegative real numbers M1,M2M_{1},M_{2}, not depending on RR, such that for every positive RR, every xRqx\in\mathbb{R}^{q} and all i,j[q]i,j\in[q],

iχR(x)M1R1,jiχR(x)M2R2.|\partial_{i}\chi_{R}(x)|\le M_{1}R^{-1},\qquad |\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\chi_{R}(x)|\le M_{2}R^{-2}.

2. (Second-moment test functions) For every positive RR the function ψR\psi_{R} is smooth and compactly supported, and there is a nonnegative real number MM, not depending on RR, such that for every positive RR, every xRqx\in\mathbb{R}^{q} and all i,j[q]i,j\in[q],

iψR(x)Mx,jiψR(x)M,ΔψR(x)qM.|\partial_{i}\psi_{R}(x)|\le M\,\lVert x\rVert,\qquad |\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\psi_{R}(x)|\le M,\qquad |\Delta\psi_{R}(x)|\le qM .

3. (Agreement on the ball) For every positive RR, every xRqx\in\mathbb{R}^{q} with x<R\lVert x\rVert<R and all i,j[q]i,j\in[q],

ψR(x)=12x2,iψR(x)=xi,jiψR(x)=δij,ΔψR(x)=q.\psi_{R}(x)=\tfrac{1}{2}\lVert x\rVert^{2},\qquad \partial_{i}\psi_{R}(x)=x_{i},\qquad \partial_{j}\partial_{i}\psi_{R}(x)=\delta_{ij},\qquad \Delta\psi_{R}(x)=q .
Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Proofs

Please log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites - 0 theorem dependents - 0 proof dependents

Prerequisites

No prerequisites tracked.

Dependents

No dependents yet.

Dependent proofs

No dependent proofs yet.

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Loading…