TheoremBase

Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors

Statement

Let KK be a field and let VV be a vector space over KK with zero vector 0V0_{V}. Let N\mathbb{N} be the set of natural numbers with successor map SS as in that definition, ordered by the relation ≤\le of that definition, let n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, and let [n][n] be the initial segment determined by nn, that is, the set of natural numbers kk with 1≤k≤n1\le k\le n. Let u:[n]→Vu:[n]\to V and v:[n]→Vv:[n]\to V be maps with values uku_{k} and vkv_{k}, let c:[n]→Kc:[n]\to K be a map with values ckc_{k}, and let λ∈K\lambda\in K.

Sums of vectors are the finite sums in a vector space, and sums of scalars are the finite sums in a field. Then the following hold.

1. (Restriction and recursion) If j∈[n]j\in[n] and v′v' denotes the restriction of vv to [j][j], then

∑k=1ivk′=∑k=1ivkfor every i∈[j].\sum_{k=1}^{i}v'_{k}=\sum_{k=1}^{i}v_{k}\qquad\text{for every }i\in[j].

Moreover

∑k=11vk=v1,∑k=1S(m)vk=(∑k=1mvk)+vS(m)whenever S(m)∈[n].\sum_{k=1}^{1}v_{k}=v_{1},\qquad \sum_{k=1}^{S(m)}v_{k}=\Bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{m}v_{k}\Bigr)+v_{S(m)}\quad\text{whenever }S(m)\in[n].

2. (Additivity)

∑k=1n(uk+vk)=∑k=1nuk+∑k=1nvk.\sum_{k=1}^{n}(u_{k}+v_{k})=\sum_{k=1}^{n}u_{k}+\sum_{k=1}^{n}v_{k}.

3. (Homogeneity)

∑k=1n(λvk)=λ∑k=1nvk.\sum_{k=1}^{n}(\lambda v_{k})=\lambda\sum_{k=1}^{n}v_{k}.

4. (Linear maps) Let WW be a vector space over KK and let T:V→WT:V\to W be a linear map. Then

T(∑k=1nvk)=∑k=1nT(vk),T\Bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{n}v_{k}\Bigr)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}T(v_{k}),

the sum on the right being the finite sum in WW.

5. (Inner products against a finite sum) Suppose KK is the field of complex numbers and VV together with ⟨⋅,⋅⟩\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle is a complex inner product space, and let w∈Vw\in V. Then

⟨w,∑k=1nvk⟩=∑k=1n⟨w,vk⟩,⟨∑k=1nvk,w⟩=∑k=1n⟨vk,w⟩,\Bigl\langle w,\sum_{k=1}^{n}v_{k}\Bigr\rangle=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\langle w,v_{k}\rangle,\qquad \Bigl\langle \sum_{k=1}^{n}v_{k},w\Bigr\rangle=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\langle v_{k},w\rangle,

the sums on the right being finite sums in the field of complex numbers.

6. (Inner products against a linear combination) Under the hypotheses of claim 5, with the complex conjugate,

⟨w,∑k=1nckvk⟩=∑k=1nck⟨w,vk⟩,⟨∑k=1nckvk,w⟩=∑k=1nck‾ ⟨vk,w⟩.\Bigl\langle w,\sum_{k=1}^{n}c_{k}v_{k}\Bigr\rangle=\sum_{k=1}^{n}c_{k}\langle w,v_{k}\rangle,\qquad \Bigl\langle \sum_{k=1}^{n}c_{k}v_{k},w\Bigr\rangle=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\overline{c_{k}}\,\langle v_{k},w\rangle .

7. (A single possibly nonzero summand) Let i∈[n]i\in[n] and suppose that vk=0Vv_{k}=0_{V} for every k∈[n]k\in[n] with k≠ik\ne i. Then

∑k=1nvk=vi.\sum_{k=1}^{n}v_{k}=v_{i}.

In particular, if vk=0Vv_{k}=0_{V} for every k∈[n]k\in[n], then ∑k=1nvk=0V\sum_{k=1}^{n}v_{k}=0_{V}.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…