TheoremBase

Existence, Penalty Bounds and Monotonicity of the Maximum of the Wasserstein-Doubled Difference of Bounded Functions

For a Wasserstein-coercive penalty pair and functions bounded above and below on the penalty domain, the Wasserstein-doubled difference of their delta-envelopes attains its supremum; the penalty is bounded by a constant over delta wherever that difference is nonnegative; and the supremum grows by explicit amounts at a maximiser when the penalty weight or the doubling strength is decreased.

Statement

In the setting of The Intrinsic Calculus on the Wasserstein Space: Standing Notation, let (D,DΣ,E,Σ)(\mathcal{D},\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma},\mathcal{E},\Sigma) be a Wasserstein-coercive penalty pair on P2(Rd)\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), and fix e0∈Re_{0}\in\mathbb{R} with e0≤E(μ)e_{0}\le\mathcal{E}(\mu) for every μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}, as provided by Basic Properties of a Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pair (ii). Let u,v:D→Ru,v:\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} and b,b′∈Rb,b'\in\mathbb{R} satisfy u(μ)≤bu(\mu)\le b and b′≤v(μ)b'\le v(\mu) for every μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}. By The Delta-Envelopes of Bounded Functions and Their Monotonicity in the Weight, for a Wasserstein-Closed Penalty Pair (i), uu has penalty-subordinate growth from above and vv from below, so that for positive δ∈R\delta\in\mathbb{R} the δ\delta-envelopes uδ−u^{-}_{\delta} and vδ+v^{+}_{\delta}, functions on D\mathcal{D}, are defined. For positive δ,α∈R\delta,\alpha\in\mathbb{R} let Ψδ,α:D×D→R\Psi_{\delta,\alpha}:\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} have the value

Ψδ,α(μ,ν)=uδ−(μ)−vδ+(ν)−α2 W2(μ,ν)2,\Psi_{\delta,\alpha}(\mu,\nu)=u^{-}_{\delta}(\mu)-v^{+}_{\delta}(\nu)-\tfrac{\alpha}{2}\,W_{2}(\mu,\nu)^{2},

where α2\tfrac{\alpha}{2} is the product of α\alpha with the multiplicative inverse of 22 (claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field). Then the following hold for all positive δ,α∈R\delta,\alpha\in\mathbb{R}.

1. (A maximiser exists) Every value of Ψδ,α\Psi_{\delta,\alpha} is at most b−b′−2δe0b-b'-2\delta e_{0}; the supremum M(δ,α)M(\delta,\alpha) of these values is a real number; and there is (μ^,ν^)∈D×D(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})\in\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D} with Ψδ,α(μ^,ν^)=M(δ,α)\Psi_{\delta,\alpha}(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})=M(\delta,\alpha), called a maximising pair of Ψδ,α\Psi_{\delta,\alpha}.

2. (The penalty where the doubled difference is nonnegative) If (μ,ν)∈D×D(\mu,\nu)\in\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D} satisfies 0≤Ψδ,α(μ,ν)0\le\Psi_{\delta,\alpha}(\mu,\nu), then

δ ∣E(μ)∣≤∣b∣+∣b′∣+δ ∣e0∣andδ ∣E(ν)∣≤∣b∣+∣b′∣+δ ∣e0∣,\delta\,|\mathcal{E}(\mu)|\le|b|+|b'|+\delta\,|e_{0}|\qquad\text{and}\qquad\delta\,|\mathcal{E}(\nu)|\le|b|+|b'|+\delta\,|e_{0}|,

where ∣s∣|s| is the absolute value of s∈Rs\in\mathbb{R}.

3. (Decreasing the penalty weight) If δ′∈R\delta'\in\mathbb{R} satisfies 0<δ′<δ0<\delta'<\delta and (μ^,ν^)(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu}) is a maximising pair of Ψδ,α\Psi_{\delta,\alpha}, then

M(δ,α)+(δ−δ′)(E(μ^)+E(ν^))≤M(δ′,α).M(\delta,\alpha)+(\delta-\delta')\bigl(\mathcal{E}(\hat{\mu})+\mathcal{E}(\hat{\nu})\bigr)\le M(\delta',\alpha).

4. (Decreasing the doubling strength) If α′∈R\alpha'\in\mathbb{R} satisfies 0<α′<α0<\alpha'<\alpha and (μ^,ν^)(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu}) is a maximising pair of Ψδ,α\Psi_{\delta,\alpha}, then

M(δ,α)+α−α′2 W2(μ^,ν^)2≤M(δ,α′).M(\delta,\alpha)+\tfrac{\alpha-\alpha'}{2}\,W_{2}(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})^{2}\le M(\delta,\alpha').

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…