TheoremBase

Limits of Penalized Maxima on a Compact Set

Statement

Let (X,d)(X,d) be a metric space, equipped with the collection of its subsets that are open in (X,d)(X,d), a topology by Metric Open Sets Form a Topology, and let K⊆XK\subseteq X be nonempty and compact in XX. Let R\mathbb{R} be the set of real numbers with the addition, multiplication and order ≤\le of its ordered field structure; for s,t∈Rs,t\in\mathbb{R} write s<ts<t to mean that s≤ts\le t and s≠ts\ne t, and write s−ts-t for s+(−t)s+(-t). Equip X×XX\times X with the product metric dX×Xd_{X\times X} obtained from dd and dd, a metric by claim 1 of The Product Metric is a Metric; by A Product of Compact Subsets is Compact in the Product Metric the set K×KK\times K is compact in X×XX\times X.

Let u:K→Ru:K\to\mathbb{R} be upper semicontinuous on KK, let v:K→Rv:K\to\mathbb{R} be lower semicontinuous on KK, and let ψ:K×K→R\psi:K\times K\to\mathbb{R} be lower semicontinuous on K×KK\times K, with respect to the metric dX×Xd_{X\times X}, and such that 0≤ψ(x,y)0\le\psi(x,y) for every (x,y)∈K×K(x,y)\in K\times K, with ψ(x,y)=0\psi(x,y)=0 if and only if x=yx=y.

For α∈R\alpha\in\mathbb{R} with 0<α0<\alpha let Φα:K×K→R\Phi_{\alpha}:K\times K\to\mathbb{R} be the function

Φα(x,y)=u(x)−v(y)−α ψ(x,y).\Phi_{\alpha}(x,y)=u(x)-v(y)-\alpha\,\psi(x,y).

Then the following hold.

1. (Attainment) The function u−v:K→Ru-v:K\to\mathbb{R} with (u−v)(x)=u(x)−v(x)(u-v)(x)=u(x)-v(x) is upper semicontinuous on KK, and there is exactly one M∈RM\in\mathbb{R} such that M=(u−v)(xM)M=(u-v)(x_{M}) for some xM∈Kx_{M}\in K and (u−v)(x)≤M(u-v)(x)\le M for every x∈Kx\in K. For each α\alpha with 0<α0<\alpha, the function Φα\Phi_{\alpha} is upper semicontinuous on K×KK\times K, and there is exactly one Mα∈RM_{\alpha}\in\mathbb{R} such that Mα=Φα(p)M_{\alpha}=\Phi_{\alpha}(p) for some p∈K×Kp\in K\times K and Φα(q)≤Mα\Phi_{\alpha}(q)\le M_{\alpha} for every q∈K×Kq\in K\times K.

In claims 2 to 6, MM and MαM_{\alpha} denote these values, and for each α\alpha with 0<α0<\alpha we let (xα,yα)(x_{\alpha},y_{\alpha}) be any point of K×KK\times K with Φα(xα,yα)=Mα\Phi_{\alpha}(x_{\alpha},y_{\alpha})=M_{\alpha}; the claims hold for every such choice.

2. (Ordering) M≤MαM\le M_{\alpha} for every α\alpha with 0<α0<\alpha, and Mβ≤MαM_{\beta}\le M_{\alpha} whenever 0<α0<\alpha and α≤β\alpha\le\beta.

3. (Convergence) For every ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} with 0<ε0<\varepsilon there is α0∈R\alpha_{0}\in\mathbb{R} with 0<α00<\alpha_{0} such that every α\alpha with α0≤α\alpha_{0}\le\alpha satisfies Mα≤M+εM_{\alpha}\le M+\varepsilon.

4. (Vanishing penalty) M≤u(xα)−v(yα)M\le u(x_{\alpha})-v(y_{\alpha}) for every α\alpha with 0<α0<\alpha; and for every ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} with 0<ε0<\varepsilon there is α1∈R\alpha_{1}\in\mathbb{R} with 0<α10<\alpha_{1} such that every α\alpha with α1≤α\alpha_{1}\le\alpha satisfies

α ψ(xα,yα)≤εandu(xα)−v(yα)≤M+ε.\alpha\,\psi(x_{\alpha},y_{\alpha})\le\varepsilon\qquad\text{and}\qquad u(x_{\alpha})-v(y_{\alpha})\le M+\varepsilon .

5. (Vanishing distance) For every η∈R\eta\in\mathbb{R} with 0<η0<\eta there is α2∈R\alpha_{2}\in\mathbb{R} with 0<α20<\alpha_{2} such that every α\alpha with α2≤α\alpha_{2}\le\alpha satisfies d(xα,yα)<ηd(x_{\alpha},y_{\alpha})<\eta.

6. (Cluster points) Let x^∈K\hat{x}\in K be a point with the following property: for all δ,β∈R\delta,\beta\in\mathbb{R} with 0<δ0<\delta and 0<β0<\beta there is α\alpha with β≤α\beta\le\alpha and d(x^,xα)<δd(\hat{x},x_{\alpha})<\delta. Then u(x^)−v(x^)=Mu(\hat{x})-v(\hat{x})=M.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…