TheoremBase

The Gaussian Smoothing Weight: Normalization, Derivatives, Exponential Tilting, Moments, and First-Order Remainder

Statement

Let m≥1m\ge1 be a natural number, let Rm\mathbb{R}^m be Euclidean space with the Euclidean norm ∥⋅∥\lVert\cdot\rVert, the dot product z⋅wz\cdot w, and the Euclidean distance dd, and let λm\lambda_m be Lebesgue measure on the Borel σ\sigma-algebra B(Rm)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^m). Let exp⁡\exp be the exponential function. A function f:Rm→Rf:\mathbb{R}^m\to\mathbb{R} is called measurable if it is measurable with respect to B(Rm)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^m) and the Borel σ\sigma-algebra of the real line, and sequentially continuous if f(zk)→f(z)f(z^k)\to f(z) whenever (zk)k∈N(z^k)_{k\in\mathbb{N}} is a sequence in Rm\mathbb{R}^m and z∈Rmz\in\mathbb{R}^m with d(zk,z)→0d(z^k,z)\to0, convergence being that of Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers, as in claim 3 of The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Euclidean Space as a Product, and Measurability of Projections, Sequentially Continuous Maps, and Open and Closed Sets. Integrals of [0,∞][0,\infty]-valued measurable functions are those of Lebesgue Integral of a Nonnegative Measurable Function, integrable means integrable with respect to λm\lambda_m, and partial derivatives are taken on the open set U=RmU=\mathbb{R}^m (open, since it contains every ball about any of its points). Sums and scalar multiples of points of Rm\mathbb{R}^m are those of Sum of Points of Rn\mathbb{R}^n and Scalar Multiple of a Point of Rn\mathbb{R}^n, so that Rm\mathbb{R}^m is a real vector space with negative −z=0−z-z=0-z. For a real t≥0t\ge0, t1/2=tt^{1/2}=\sqrt{t} denotes the nonnegative square root, and t−1/2=1/t1/2t^{-1/2}=1/t^{1/2} for t>0t>0.

Let η\eta be a real number with 0<η≤10<\eta\le1 and define ψη:Rm→R\psi_\eta:\mathbb{R}^m\to\mathbb{R} by

ψη(z)=exp⁡(−∥z∥22η).\psi_\eta(z)=\exp\Bigl(-\frac{\lVert z\rVert^{2}}{2\eta}\Bigr).

1. (Normalization) ψη\psi_\eta is sequentially continuous and measurable, 0<ψη(z)≤10<\psi_\eta(z)\le1 for every zz, and 0<∫Rmψη dλm<∞0<\int_{\mathbb{R}^m}\psi_\eta\,d\lambda_m<\infty. Consequently there is exactly one real number cη>0c_\eta>0 with ∫Rmcηψη dλm=1\int_{\mathbb{R}^m}c_\eta\psi_\eta\,d\lambda_m=1. The Gaussian smoothing weight φη=cηψη\varphi_\eta=c_\eta\psi_\eta is sequentially continuous and measurable, satisfies 0<φη(z)≤cη0<\varphi_\eta(z)\le c_\eta and φη(−z)=φη(z)\varphi_\eta(-z)=\varphi_\eta(z) for every zz, and for every a∈Rma\in\mathbb{R}^m the map z↦φη(z−a)z\mapsto\varphi_\eta(z-a) is measurable with

∫Rmφη(z−a) dλm(z)=1.\int_{\mathbb{R}^m}\varphi_\eta(z-a)\,d\lambda_m(z)=1.

2. (Partial derivatives) For every i∈{1,…,m}i\in\{1,\dots,m\} and every z=(z1,…,zm)∈Rmz=(z_1,\dots,z_m)\in\mathbb{R}^m the partial derivative of φη\varphi_\eta with respect to the iith variable exists at zz and

∂iφη(z)=−ziη φη(z).\partial_i\varphi_\eta(z)=-\frac{z_i}{\eta}\,\varphi_\eta(z).

The function ∂iφη\partial_i\varphi_\eta is sequentially continuous and ∣∂iφη(z)∣≤cη (2η)−1/2|\partial_i\varphi_\eta(z)|\le c_\eta\,(2\eta)^{-1/2} for every zz.

3. (Exponential tilting) Let a∈Rma\in\mathbb{R}^m and put Za(z)=a⋅z/ηZ_a(z)=a\cdot z/\eta for z∈Rmz\in\mathbb{R}^m and κa=∥a∥2/η\kappa_a=\lVert a\rVert^{2}/\eta. Then for every z∈Rmz\in\mathbb{R}^m

φη(z) exp⁡(Za(z))=exp⁡(κa/2) φη(z−a),\varphi_\eta(z)\,\exp\bigl(Z_a(z)\bigr)=\exp(\kappa_a/2)\,\varphi_\eta(z-a),

the functions φηexp⁡(Za)\varphi_\eta\exp(Z_a) and z↦φη(z−a)2/φη(z)z\mapsto\varphi_\eta(z-a)^{2}/\varphi_\eta(z) are measurable, and

∫Rmφηexp⁡(Za) dλm=exp⁡(κa/2),∫Rmφη(z−a)2φη(z) dλm(z)=exp⁡(κa).\int_{\mathbb{R}^m}\varphi_\eta\exp(Z_a)\,d\lambda_m=\exp(\kappa_a/2),\qquad\int_{\mathbb{R}^m}\frac{\varphi_\eta(z-a)^{2}}{\varphi_\eta(z)}\,d\lambda_m(z)=\exp(\kappa_a).

4. (Moments) With aa, ZaZ_a and κa\kappa_a as in claim 3, the functions ZaφηZ_a\varphi_\eta, Za2φηZ_a^{2}\varphi_\eta and Zaexp⁡(Za)φηZ_a\exp(Z_a)\varphi_\eta are integrable, and

∫RmZaφη dλm=0,∫RmZa2φη dλm=κa,∫RmZaexp⁡(Za)φη dλm=κaexp⁡(κa/2).\int_{\mathbb{R}^m}Z_a\varphi_\eta\,d\lambda_m=0,\qquad\int_{\mathbb{R}^m}Z_a^{2}\varphi_\eta\,d\lambda_m=\kappa_a,\qquad\int_{\mathbb{R}^m}Z_a\exp(Z_a)\varphi_\eta\,d\lambda_m=\kappa_a\exp(\kappa_a/2).

5. (First-order remainder) With a=(a1,…,am)a=(a_1,\dots,a_m), ZaZ_a and κa\kappa_a as in claim 3, define Ra:Rm→RR_a:\mathbb{R}^m\to\mathbb{R} by

Ra(z)=φη(z−a)−φη(z)+∑i=1mai ∂iφη(z).R_a(z)=\varphi_\eta(z-a)-\varphi_\eta(z)+\sum_{i=1}^{m}a_i\,\partial_i\varphi_\eta(z).

Then RaR_a is sequentially continuous, Ra(z)=φη(z)(exp⁡(Za(z)−κa/2)−1−Za(z))R_a(z)=\varphi_\eta(z)\bigl(\exp(Z_a(z)-\kappa_a/2)-1-Z_a(z)\bigr) for every zz, the function Ra2/φηR_a^{2}/\varphi_\eta is integrable, and

∫RmRa(z)2φη(z) dλm(z)=exp⁡(κa)−1−κa≤κa22exp⁡(κa).\int_{\mathbb{R}^m}\frac{R_a(z)^{2}}{\varphi_\eta(z)}\,d\lambda_m(z)=\exp(\kappa_a)-1-\kappa_a\le\frac{\kappa_a^{2}}{2}\exp(\kappa_a).

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…