TheoremBase

Existence, Penalty Bounds and Optimal Realisation at a Maximiser of the Wasserstein-Doubled Difference on the Lift

For a Wasserstein-coercive pair the Wasserstein-doubled difference of the delta-envelopes attains its supremum, the penalty and second moment are bounded at a near-maximiser independently of the doubling strength, the penalised distance vanishes along a doubling sequence, and the maximiser is always realised on the lift by an optimally coupled pair which maximises the lifted doubled difference.

Statement

In the setting of Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation, assume that (Ω,F,P)(\Omega,\mathcal{F},P) is rich, which Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation (v) does not assume, and let (D,DΣ,E,Σ)(\mathcal{D},\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma},\mathcal{E},\Sigma) be a Wasserstein-coercive penalty pair on P2(Rd)\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}). The set D\mathcal{D} contains the nonempty DΣ\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} by Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains (i) and Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains (ii); fix μ0∈D\mu_{0}\in\mathcal{D}, and fix e0∈Re_{0}\in\mathbb{R} with e0≤E(μ)e_{0}\le\mathcal{E}(\mu) for every μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}, as provided by Basic Properties of a Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pair (ii).

Let δ∈R\delta\in\mathbb{R} be positive and let u,v:P2(Rd)→Ru,v:\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d})\to\mathbb{R} be such that uu is upper semicontinuous and vv lower semicontinuous on P2(Rd)\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) relative to P2(Rd)\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) in (P2(Rd),W2)(\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),W_{2}), and such that u(σ)≤bu(\sigma)\le b and b′≤v(σ)b'\le v(\sigma) for every σ∈P2(Rd)\sigma\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) and some b,b′∈Rb,b'\in\mathbb{R}. By Basic Properties of a Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pair (iv) the δ\delta-envelope uδ−u^{-}_{\delta} of uu and the δ\delta-envelope vδ+v^{+}_{\delta} of vv relative to the penalty pair are defined and satisfy uδ−=u−δEu^{-}_{\delta}=u-\delta\mathcal{E} and vδ+=v+δEv^{+}_{\delta}=v+\delta\mathcal{E} on D\mathcal{D}.

For positive α∈R\alpha\in\mathbb{R} let Ψα:D×D→R\Psi_{\alpha}:\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} be the function with value

Ψα(μ,ν)=uδ−(μ)−vδ+(ν)−α2 W2(μ,ν)2,\Psi_{\alpha}(\mu,\nu)=u^{-}_{\delta}(\mu)-v^{+}_{\delta}(\nu)-\tfrac{\alpha}{2}\,W_{2}(\mu,\nu)^{2},

let M(α)M(\alpha) be the supremum of its values, and put

c0=δ−1(b−b′−u(μ0)+v(μ0)+2δ E(μ0))−e0.c_{0}=\delta^{-1}\bigl(b-b'-u(\mu_{0})+v(\mu_{0})+2\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\mu_{0})\bigr)-e_{0}.

Write DΛ\mathcal{D}^{\Lambda} for the preimage of D\mathcal{D} under the law map, and let 2n2^{n} be the natural power; the letter kk, a dimension in Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation, is not used here. Then the following hold.

1. (A maximiser exists) For every positive α∈R\alpha\in\mathbb{R} the supremum M(α)M(\alpha) is a real number and there is (μ^,ν^)∈D×D(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})\in\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D} with Ψα(μ^,ν^)=M(α)\Psi_{\alpha}(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})=M(\alpha).

2. (The penalty is bounded at a near-maximiser) Let α∈R\alpha\in\mathbb{R} be positive, let η∈R\eta\in\mathbb{R} be nonnegative and let (μ^,ν^)∈D×D(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})\in\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D} satisfy Ψα(μ0,μ0)−η≤Ψα(μ^,ν^)\Psi_{\alpha}(\mu_{0},\mu_{0})-\eta\le\Psi_{\alpha}(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu}). Then E(μ^)≤c0+δ−1η\mathcal{E}(\hat{\mu})\le c_{0}+\delta^{-1}\eta and E(ν^)≤c0+δ−1η\mathcal{E}(\hat{\nu})\le c_{0}+\delta^{-1}\eta, and if R∈RR\in\mathbb{R} is as in Basic Properties of a Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pair (i) for the level c=c0+δ−1ηc=c_{0}+\delta^{-1}\eta then M2(μ^)≤RM_{2}(\hat{\mu})\le R and M2(ν^)≤RM_{2}(\hat{\nu})\le R. Neither bound depends on α\alpha.

3. (The penalised distance vanishes along a doubling sequence) Let α0∈R\alpha_{0}\in\mathbb{R} be positive and let αn=2nα0\alpha_{n}=2^{n}\alpha_{0} for n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. For each nn let (μ^n,ν^n)∈D×D(\hat{\mu}_{n},\hat{\nu}_{n})\in\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D} satisfy Ψαn(μ^n,ν^n)=M(αn)\Psi_{\alpha_{n}}(\hat{\mu}_{n},\hat{\nu}_{n})=M(\alpha_{n}). Then the sequence whose nn-th term is

αn W2(μ^n,ν^n)2\alpha_{n}\,W_{2}(\hat{\mu}_{n},\hat{\nu}_{n})^{2}

converges to 00; in particular so does the sequence whose nn-th term is W2(μ^n,ν^n)W_{2}(\hat{\mu}_{n},\hat{\nu}_{n}).

4. (Realisation by an optimally coupled pair) Let α∈R\alpha\in\mathbb{R} be positive and let (μ^,ν^)∈D×D(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})\in\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D} satisfy Ψα(μ^,ν^)=M(α)\Psi_{\alpha}(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})=M(\alpha). Then there are X^,Y^∈DΛ\hat{X},\hat{Y}\in\mathcal{D}^{\Lambda} with L(X^)=μ^\mathcal{L}(\hat{X})=\hat{\mu}, L(Y^)=ν^\mathcal{L}(\hat{Y})=\hat{\nu} and

∥X^−Y^∥L2=W2(μ^,ν^),\lVert\hat{X}-\hat{Y}\rVert_{L^{2}}=W_{2}(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu}),

and for any such pair the law of the pairing (X^,Y^)(\hat{X},\hat{Y}) is an optimal coupling of μ^\hat{\mu} and ν^\hat{\nu} and

uδ−(L(X))−vδ+(L(Y))−α2∥X−Y∥L22 ≤ uδ−(μ^)−vδ+(ν^)−α2∥X^−Y^∥L22u^{-}_{\delta}(\mathcal{L}(X))-v^{+}_{\delta}(\mathcal{L}(Y))-\tfrac{\alpha}{2}\lVert X-Y\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}\ \le\ u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})-v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})-\tfrac{\alpha}{2}\lVert\hat{X}-\hat{Y}\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}

for all X,Y∈DΛX,Y\in\mathcal{D}^{\Lambda}.

5. (The two one-variable extrema) Let α\alpha, (μ^,ν^)(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu}) and X^,Y^\hat{X},\hat{Y} be as in claim 4. Then the function DΛ→R\mathcal{D}^{\Lambda}\to\mathbb{R} with value uδ−(L(X))−α2∥X−Y^∥L22u^{-}_{\delta}(\mathcal{L}(X))-\tfrac{\alpha}{2}\lVert X-\hat{Y}\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2} at XX attains at X^\hat{X} a value at least its value at every point of DΛ\mathcal{D}^{\Lambda}, and the function DΛ→R\mathcal{D}^{\Lambda}\to\mathbb{R} with value vδ+(L(Y))+α2∥X^−Y∥L22v^{+}_{\delta}(\mathcal{L}(Y))+\tfrac{\alpha}{2}\lVert\hat{X}-Y\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2} at YY attains at Y^\hat{Y} a value at most its value at every point of DΛ\mathcal{D}^{\Lambda}. In particular the first has a local maximum at X^\hat{X} relative to DΛ\mathcal{D}^{\Lambda} and the second a local minimum at Y^\hat{Y} relative to DΛ\mathcal{D}^{\Lambda}, in the metric space (L2(Ω;Rd),dL2)(L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d}),d_{L^{2}}).

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…