Comparison of the N-Agent System with the Mean-Field Flow and Cost along the Realized Control
lemmaAnalysisProbabilitylem:n-agent-mean-field-comparison-2026aLet be an affine-controlled transition-rate family on states with control set and let be its projected extension, with rate bound , aggregate state drift and state-Lipschitz constant , so that for all in the probability simplex and every by claim 4 there, where is the Euclidean norm. As part of the data of the rate family, is a nonempty compact convex subset of Euclidean space .
Let be an observation-rate family on states with channels, let be a real number, and let be population cost data on states with control dimension that is convex in the control on , meaning that for every the function sending to is convex on ; these are the standing hypotheses of the boundedness, lower-semicontinuity and attainment theorem for the mean-field cost. Let be the bound of claim 1 of the lemma on cost data over a compact control set, so that and for every and every , and let be the bound of claim 1 of that theorem. Let be the mean-field flow of claim 2 of the flow stability lemma and let be the mean-field cost of a control from an initial state under . Let be the set of -valued controls and let , , and be as in the compactness lemma for the simplex, the control set and their product. Write for the restricted Lebesgue measure on .
Let be a natural number, let be an -agent driving system, let be an observation-driven control policy with horizon , control dimension and channels that is -valued, and let be a solution of the controlled -agent dynamics on for , , this driving system and this policy, with regular event and empirical state measure . Let be the realized control of the realized-control lemma, so that for every , the pair is a random element of , and for every and every .
Let be the martingale part of the martingale decomposition of the empirical state measure, and let and be the event of probability and the random variable furnished by the martingale bound for the empirical state measure, so that for every and every , the path is right-continuous on for every , and . Let be the -agent cost of the policy .
Then the following hold.
1. (Pathwise comparison of the flows.) Let and write for the mean-field flow started at the realized initial state and driven by the realized control. Then
2. (The realized mean-field cost, and finiteness of the -agent cost.) The map is a random variable, and for every . Moreover, fix a point and let be the map with for and for , so that for every and every . Then
defines a random variable with for every , the -agent cost is a real number, and .
3. (Uniform comparison of the costs.) For every real there is a natural number , depending only on , , , , , and , and not on , on the driving system, on the policy or on the solution, such that
holds for every , every -agent driving system, every -valued observation-driven control policy with horizon , control dimension and channels, and every solution of the controlled -agent dynamics for those data.
Loading…
Prerequisites
No prerequisites tracked.
Dependents
No dependents yet.
Dependent proofs
No dependent proofs yet.
No relations recorded yet.