Reason: First publication. Anchored good-set clocks on a subinterval, stopping times of both the observation and the system filtration, with the truncated block escape bound.
Statement
Adopt the setting, notation and definitions of the extended good-set stopping-time lemma: the affine-controlled transition-rate family(β0,β1) on l states with compact convex control set A⊆Rm, its transition-rate familyβ with rate bound B, aggregate state drift b, state-Lipschitz constant Λb, control bound R, the constant K1 of that lemma, and K2=2l(l−1)K1; the horizon T>0; the solution of the controlled N-agent dynamics with observation filtration (Gt)t∈[0,T] and system filtration (Ftsys)t∈[0,T]; the realized control α^; the set UA, the flow notation S(z0,ξ), and the admissible representatives of the extended lemma, together with the element ζA of UA represented by A (claim 4 of the extended lemma); the point x0 of the probability simplexΔl, the realized mean-field flow Φ, the map S∗ with continuous components and the deviation Yt=∣Φt−St∗∣; the map A:[0,T]→A with measurable components and the energy E; the reals δ>0, θout>0, cE>0 and the clipped-out time O of that lemma; and its conventions for stopping times, order-relation events, Lebesgue integrals over compact intervals, the expectationE, and continuity relative to subintervals of the real numbers with the metric of the real line.
Fix a real number t0∈[0,T], called the anchor, and a real number ε1, and set Ca=lelΛbT, with exp the exponential function and ⋅ the nonnegative square root. For ω∈Ω put
and define σY(ω), σE(ω), σout(ω) to be the greatest lower bounds of these sets when they are nonempty (existing by the existence theorem for infima, the sets being bounded below by t0) and T otherwise, and the anchored good-set clock
σ∗(ω)=min(σY(ω),σE(ω),σout(ω)).
Then the following hold.
1. (Stopping.) Each of σY, σE, σout and σ∗ takes values in [t0,T] and is a stopping time of (Gt)t∈[0,T] and of (Ftsys)t∈[0,T], and {t<σ∗}∈Gt for every t∈[0,T]. Moreover {σE≤q}={Eq−Et0≥cE} and {σout≤q}={Oq−Ot0≥θout} for every q∈[t0,T).
2. (Pre- and stopped bounds.) For every ω∈Ω: if t∈[t0,T] and t<σ∗(ω) then
for every t∈[t0,T], writing u=min(t,σ∗(ω)), one has Eu(ω)−Et0(ω)≤cE and Ou(ω)−Ot0(ω)≤θout, and if Yt0(ω)<ε1 then also Yu(ω)≤ε1. Moreover δ2(Ot(ω)−Ot0(ω))≤Et(ω)−Et0(ω) for all t∈[t0,T].
3. (Hitting values.) For every ω∈Ω: if σY(ω)<T then YσY(ω)(ω)≥ε1; if σE(ω)<T then EσE(ω)(ω)−Et0(ω)≥cE; and if σout(ω)<T then Oσout(ω)(ω)−Ot0(ω)≥θout.
4. (Anchored deviation-energy bound.) Suppose, as in claim 4 of the extended good-set stopping-time lemma, that S∗ takes values in Δl, that S0∗=x0, and that St∗γ=x0γ+∫[0,t]bγ(Ss∗,As)ds for all t and γ. Then for every ω∈Ω and all t0≤t≤T,
Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.