TheoremBase

The Hubbard-Stratonovich Transform Couples the Ising Measure and the Field Law: the Density of the Field Law, the Disintegration of the Joint Law, and Entropy Contraction under Both Kernels

The Hubbard-Stratonovich field law has an explicit positive continuous density with respect to the Gaussian reference, the joint law disintegrates through the field-to-spin kernel, and the field law is carried back to the Ising measure. Relative entropy does not increase under either kernel.

Statement

In the setting of The Free Field on the Torus as the Gaussian Reference Measure, with Square-Integrable White Noise: Standing Notation, let M∈NM\in\mathbb{N}, and let the side L=2M+1L=2M+1 and the cube ΓM\Gamma_{M} be those of The Lattice Torus of Odd Side, Lattice Fields, and the Discrete Fourier Coefficients of a Lattice Field. Let j\mathfrak{j} be a reflection-symmetric periodic pair interaction of side LL with interaction matrix JJ and symbol J^\hat{J}, and let η∈R\eta\in\mathbb{R} be a shift for j\mathfrak{j}, so that qk=J^(k)+η>0\mathfrak{q}_{k}=\hat{J}(k)+\eta>0 for every k∈ΓMk\in\Gamma_{M}. Let γcJ,η\gamma_{c^{J,\eta}} be the Gaussian reference, KJ,η↑K^{\uparrow}_{J,\eta} the spin-to-field kernel, K↓K^{\downarrow} the field-to-spin kernel, λKJ,η↑\lambda K^{\uparrow}_{J,\eta} and νK↓\nu K^{\downarrow} the transported laws, γJ,ηHS\gamma^{\mathrm{HS}}_{J,\eta} the field law and ΞJ,η\Xi_{J,\eta} the joint law of The Hubbard-Stratonovich Transform of the Ising Measure on the Lattice Torus, with the lattice torus LM\mathbb{L}_{M}, the site fields φx\varphi_{x}, B(X)\mathcal{B}(X), P(X)\mathcal{P}(X), exp⁡\exp and lch⁡\operatorname{lch} as there. Let CM\mathcal{C}_{M} be the set of spin configurations, with power set 2CM2^{\mathcal{C}_{M}}, let PJ\mathbb{P}_{J} be the Ising measure of j\mathfrak{j}, and let ZJZ_{J} be its partition function. Integrals and integrability are those of Measure Spaces and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation, with ∫h(t) λ(dt)\int h(t)\,\lambda(dt) and indicators 1A\mathbf{1}_{A} as in Integration Against a Probability Kernel: Measurable Sections, the Composite Measure on the Product and the Iterated Integral. Finite relative entropy and H(⋅ ∣ ⋅)H(\cdot\,|\,\cdot) are those of Relative Entropy of Probability Measures §relative-entropy, on (X,B(X))(X,\mathcal{B}(X)) and on (CM,2CM)(\mathcal{C}_{M},2^{\mathcal{C}_{M}}), and LnL^{n} is the natural power of LL in R\mathbb{R}.

1. (Density of the field law) Let ϱJ,ηHS:X→R\varrho^{\mathrm{HS}}_{J,\eta}:X\to\mathbb{R} be the map

ϱJ,ηHS(x)=1ZJexp⁡(−ηLn2+∑z∈LMlch⁡(φx(z))).\varrho^{\mathrm{HS}}_{J,\eta}(x)=\frac{1}{Z_{J}}\exp\Bigl(-\frac{\eta L^{n}}{2}+\sum_{z\in\mathbb{L}_{M}}\operatorname{lch}\bigl(\varphi_{x}(z)\bigr)\Bigr).

It is positive and continuous with respect to the distance of XX, ∫XϱJ,ηHS dγcJ,η=1\int_{X}\varrho^{\mathrm{HS}}_{J,\eta}\,d\gamma_{c^{J,\eta}}=1, and

γJ,ηHS(B)=∫X1B ϱJ,ηHS dγcJ,ηfor every B∈B(X).\gamma^{\mathrm{HS}}_{J,\eta}(B)=\int_{X}\mathbf{1}_{B}\,\varrho^{\mathrm{HS}}_{J,\eta}\,d\gamma_{c^{J,\eta}}\qquad\text{for every }B\in\mathcal{B}(X).

2. (Disintegration of the joint law) For every A⊆CMA\subseteq\mathcal{C}_{M} and every B∈B(X)B\in\mathcal{B}(X),

ΞJ,η(A×B)=∫X1B(x) K↓(x,A) γJ,ηHS(dx).\Xi_{J,\eta}(A\times B)=\int_{X}\mathbf{1}_{B}(x)\,K^{\downarrow}(x,A)\,\gamma^{\mathrm{HS}}_{J,\eta}(dx).

3. (Marginals) γJ,ηHSK↓=PJ\gamma^{\mathrm{HS}}_{J,\eta}K^{\downarrow}=\mathbb{P}_{J}.

4. (Entropy contraction under the field-to-spin kernel) Let ν∈P(X)\nu\in\mathcal{P}(X) have finite relative entropy with respect to γJ,ηHS\gamma^{\mathrm{HS}}_{J,\eta}. Then νK↓\nu K^{\downarrow} has finite relative entropy with respect to PJ\mathbb{P}_{J}, and

H(νK↓ ∣ PJ)≤H(ν ∣ γJ,ηHS).H(\nu K^{\downarrow}\,|\,\mathbb{P}_{J})\le H(\nu\,|\,\gamma^{\mathrm{HS}}_{J,\eta}).

5. (Entropy contraction under the spin-to-field kernel) Let λ\lambda be a probability measure on (CM,2CM)(\mathcal{C}_{M},2^{\mathcal{C}_{M}}). Then λ\lambda has finite relative entropy with respect to PJ\mathbb{P}_{J}, λKJ,η↑\lambda K^{\uparrow}_{J,\eta} has finite relative entropy with respect to γJ,ηHS\gamma^{\mathrm{HS}}_{J,\eta}, and

H(λKJ,η↑ ∣ γJ,ηHS)≤H(λ ∣ PJ).H(\lambda K^{\uparrow}_{J,\eta}\,|\,\gamma^{\mathrm{HS}}_{J,\eta})\le H(\lambda\,|\,\mathbb{P}_{J}).

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…