Let l l l , m m m , A \mathcal{A} A , Ξ² \beta Ξ² with rate bound B B B , ( U , V , Ξ² Λ ) (U,V,\bar{\beta}) ( U , V , Ξ² Λ β ) with derivative bound K K K , ( L , G ) (L,G) ( L , G ) , ( W , L Λ , G Λ ) (W,\bar{L},\bar{G}) ( W , L Λ , G Λ ) with second-derivative bound K c K_c K c β , T > 0 T>0 T > 0 , and ( S , A ) (S,A) ( S , A ) be as in the definition of a stationary mean-field triple , let b Λ \bar{b} b Λ be the extended aggregate state drift of ( U , V , Ξ² Λ ) (U,V,\bar{\beta}) ( U , V , Ξ² Λ β ) , let P P P be a stationary co-state for these data, and adopt the partial-derivative notation β j β i \partial_j\partial_i β j β β i β of the extension definitions . Throughout, a real-valued function on a subinterval I I I of the real numbers R \mathbb{R} R is called continuous on I I I when it is continuous relative to I I I , both I I I and the codomain R \mathbb{R} R carrying the metric of the real line . Define, for t β [ 0 , T ] t\in[0,T] t β [ 0 , T ] and i , j β { 1 , β¦ , l + m } i,j\in\{1,\dots,l+m\} i , j β { 1 , β¦ , l + m } , the fluctuation Hessian coefficients
H i j ( t ) = β j β i L Λ ( S t , A t ) β β Ξ΄ = 1 l P t Ξ΄ β β j β i b Λ Ξ΄ ( S t , A t ) , F Ξ³ Ξ΄ = β Ξ΄ β Ξ³ G Λ ( S T ) ( Ξ³ , Ξ΄ β { 1 , β¦ , l } ) , H_{ij}(t)=\partial_j\partial_i\bar{L}(S_t,A_t)-\sum_{\delta=1}^{l}P^\delta_t\,\partial_j\partial_i\bar{b}^\delta(S_t,A_t),\qquad\qquad F_{\gamma\delta}=\partial_\delta\partial_\gamma\bar{G}(S_T)\quad(\gamma,\delta\in\{1,\dots,l\}), H ij β ( t ) = β j β β i β L Λ ( S t β , A t β ) β Ξ΄ = 1 β l β P t Ξ΄ β β j β β i β b Λ Ξ΄ ( S t β , A t β ) , F Ξ³ Ξ΄ β = β Ξ΄ β β Ξ³ β G Λ ( S T β ) ( Ξ³ , Ξ΄ β { 1 , β¦ , l }) ,
where the second-order partial derivatives of b Λ \bar{b} b Λ exist and are continuous by part (i) of the regularity of the extended aggregate state drift , and those of L Λ \bar{L} L Λ and G Λ \bar{G} G Λ exist and are continuous by clause 2 of the cost extension definition together with clauses 1 and 2 of the C k C^k C k definition . Each H i j H_{ij} H ij β is continuous on [ 0 , T ] [0,T] [ 0 , T ] , by continuity of compositions and continuity of sums and products (both applied pointwise on [ 0 , T ] [0,T] [ 0 , T ] , the Euclidean and metric notions of continuity for real-valued maps agreeing by claim 1 of the continuity agreement lemma , and the vector map t β¦ ( S t , A t ) t\mapsto(S_t,A_t) t β¦ ( S t β , A t β ) being continuous into R l + m \mathbb{R}^{l+m} R l + m in the Euclidean sense because d ( ( S s , A s ) , ( S t , A t ) ) β€ β Ξ³ = 1 l β£ S s Ξ³ β S t Ξ³ β£ + β j = 1 m β£ A s j β A t j β£ d((S_s,A_s),(S_t,A_t))\le\sum_{\gamma=1}^{l}|S^\gamma_s-S^\gamma_t|+\sum_{j=1}^{m}|A^j_s-A^j_t| d (( S s β , A s β ) , ( S t β , A t β )) β€ β Ξ³ = 1 l β β£ S s Ξ³ β β S t Ξ³ β β£ + β j = 1 m β β£ A s j β β A t j β β£ by claim 1 of the componentwise estimates , each summand being controlled by the continuity of the components in clause 1 of the trajectory-pair definition) along the continuous trajectory pair and the continuous co-state; by the extreme value theorem it attains a maximum and a minimum on [ 0 , T ] [0,T] [ 0 , T ] , and is therefore bounded.
Let ( x t ) t β [ 0 , T ] (x_t)_{t\in[0,T]} ( x t β ) t β [ 0 , T ] β and ( a t ) t β [ 0 , T ] (a_t)_{t\in[0,T]} ( a t β ) t β [ 0 , T ] β be families of R l \mathbb{R}^l R l -valued and R m \mathbb{R}^m R m -valued random vectors on a common probability space ( Ξ© , F , P ) (\Omega,\mathcal{F},\mathbb{P}) ( Ξ© , F , P ) (each component a random variable), and write z t = ( x t , a t ) z_t=(x_t,a_t) z t β = ( x t β , a t β ) , identified with an R l + m \mathbb{R}^{l+m} R l + m -valued map with components z t 1 , β¦ , z t l + m z^1_t,\dots,z^{l+m}_t z t 1 β , β¦ , z t l + m β , so that x t x_t x t β has components x t 1 , β¦ , x t l x^1_t,\dots,x^l_t x t 1 β , β¦ , x t l β and a t a_t a t β has components a t 1 , β¦ , a t m a^1_t,\dots,a^m_t a t 1 β , β¦ , a t m β (the symbol x t x_t x t β here is unrelated to the generic point x = ( Ξ£ , Ξ± ) x=(\Sigma,\alpha) x = ( Ξ£ , Ξ± ) of the extension definitions), such that:
(i) there is an event Ξ© 1 \Omega_1 Ξ© 1 β of probability 1 1 1 such that, for each i β { 1 , β¦ , l + m } i\in\{1,\dots,l+m\} i β { 1 , β¦ , l + m } , the map ( t , Ο ) β¦ 1 Ξ© 1 ( Ο ) β z t i ( Ο ) (t,\omega)\mapsto\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_1}(\omega)\,z^i_t(\omega) ( t , Ο ) β¦ 1 Ξ© 1 β β ( Ο ) z t i β ( Ο ) on [ 0 , T ] Γ Ξ© [0,T]\times\Omega [ 0 , T ] Γ Ξ© is measurable with respect to the product Ο \sigma Ο -algebra of the trace Borel Ο \sigma Ο -algebra on [ 0 , T ] [0,T] [ 0 , T ] and F \mathcal{F} F , where 1 Ξ© 1 \mathbf{1}_{\Omega_1} 1 Ξ© 1 β β is the function equal to 1 1 1 on Ξ© 1 \Omega_1 Ξ© 1 β and 0 0 0 off Ξ© 1 \Omega_1 Ξ© 1 β ;
(ii) β« [ 0 , T ] E [ β£ x t β£ 2 + β£ a t β£ 2 ] β d t < β \displaystyle\int_{[0,T]}\mathbb{E}\big[|x_t|^2+|a_t|^2\big]\,dt<\infty β« [ 0 , T ] β E [ β£ x t β β£ 2 + β£ a t β β£ 2 ] d t < β , where β£ β
β£ |\cdot| β£ β
β£ is the Euclidean norm (Euclidean distance to the origin) and the integral is the Lebesgue integral with value in [ 0 , β ] [0,\infty] [ 0 , β ] . Here the map ( t , Ο ) β¦ 1 Ξ© 1 ( Ο ) ( β£ x t ( Ο ) β£ 2 + β£ a t ( Ο ) β£ 2 ) (t,\omega)\mapsto\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_1}(\omega)\big(|x_t(\omega)|^2+|a_t(\omega)|^2\big) ( t , Ο ) β¦ 1 Ξ© 1 β β ( Ο ) ( β£ x t β ( Ο ) β£ 2 + β£ a t β ( Ο ) β£ 2 ) is product-measurable, being a jointly continuous, hence sequentially continuous, function of the maps of (i) by measurability of sequentially continuous functions of measurable Euclidean maps (using 1 Ξ© 1 2 = 1 Ξ© 1 \mathbf{1}_{\Omega_1}^2=\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_1} 1 Ξ© 1 β 2 β = 1 Ξ© 1 β β ), so the integrand t β¦ E [ β£ x t β£ 2 + β£ a t β£ 2 ] t\mapsto\mathbb{E}\big[|x_t|^2+|a_t|^2\big] t β¦ E [ β£ x t β β£ 2 + β£ a t β β£ 2 ] is a measurable [ 0 , β ] [0,\infty] [ 0 , β ] -valued function of t t t by the Tonelli theorem , applicable here and in every use below because the trace Lebesgue measure on [ 0 , T ] [0,T] [ 0 , T ] (a finite measure ) and P \mathbb{P} P are finite, hence Ο \sigma Ο -finite, measures. The integrand is unchanged when z t z_t z t β is replaced by 1 Ξ© 1 z t \mathbf{1}_{\Omega_1}z_t 1 Ξ© 1 β β z t β : writing N N N for the complement of Ξ© 1 \Omega_1 Ξ© 1 β , an event of probability zero, the functions β£ x t β£ 2 + β£ a t β£ 2 |x_t|^2+|a_t|^2 β£ x t β β£ 2 + β£ a t β β£ 2 , 1 Ξ© 1 ( β£ x t β£ 2 + β£ a t β£ 2 ) \mathbf{1}_{\Omega_1}\big(|x_t|^2+|a_t|^2\big) 1 Ξ© 1 β β ( β£ x t β β£ 2 + β£ a t β β£ 2 ) , and 1 N ( β£ x t β£ 2 + β£ a t β£ 2 ) \mathbf{1}_{N}\big(|x_t|^2+|a_t|^2\big) 1 N β ( β£ x t β β£ 2 + β£ a t β β£ 2 ) are nonnegative random variables (sequentially continuous functions of random variables, again by the same lemma ); the third is dominated pointwise by the [ 0 , β ] [0,\infty] [ 0 , β ] -valued function equal to β \infty β on N N N and 0 0 0 elsewhere, which is the increasing pointwise limit of the simple functions n β 1 N n\,\mathbf{1}_{N} n 1 N β and so has expectation 0 0 0 by monotone convergence and the integral of a simple function ; hence 1 N ( β£ x t β£ 2 + β£ a t β£ 2 ) \mathbf{1}_{N}\big(|x_t|^2+|a_t|^2\big) 1 N β ( β£ x t β β£ 2 + β£ a t β β£ 2 ) has expectation 0 0 0 by monotonicity , and additivity gives E [ β£ x t β£ 2 + β£ a t β£ 2 ] = E [ 1 Ξ© 1 ( β£ x t β£ 2 + β£ a t β£ 2 ) ] \mathbb{E}\big[|x_t|^2+|a_t|^2\big]=\mathbb{E}\big[\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_1}\big(|x_t|^2+|a_t|^2\big)\big] E [ β£ x t β β£ 2 + β£ a t β β£ 2 ] = E [ 1 Ξ© 1 β β ( β£ x t β β£ 2 + β£ a t β β£ 2 ) ] ;
(iii) E [ β£ x T β£ 2 ] < β \mathbb{E}\big[|x_T|^2\big]<\infty E [ β£ x T β β£ 2 ] < β , with the expectation .
Write Ο t ( Ο ) = 1 2 β i = 1 l + m β j = 1 l + m H i j ( t ) β z t i ( Ο ) β z t j ( Ο ) \psi_t(\omega)=\tfrac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^{l+m}\sum_{j=1}^{l+m}H_{ij}(t)\,z^i_t(\omega)\,z^j_t(\omega) Ο t β ( Ο ) = 2 1 β β i = 1 l + m β β j = 1 l + m β H ij β ( t ) z t i β ( Ο ) z t j β ( Ο ) for ( t , Ο ) β [ 0 , T ] Γ Ξ© (t,\omega)\in[0,T]\times\Omega ( t , Ο ) β [ 0 , T ] Γ Ξ© . Since 1 Ξ© 1 2 = 1 Ξ© 1 \mathbf{1}_{\Omega_1}^2=\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_1} 1 Ξ© 1 β 2 β = 1 Ξ© 1 β β , the map ( t , Ο ) β¦ 1 Ξ© 1 ( Ο ) β Ο t ( Ο ) (t,\omega)\mapsto\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_1}(\omega)\,\psi_t(\omega) ( t , Ο ) β¦ 1 Ξ© 1 β β ( Ο ) Ο t β ( Ο ) is a jointly continuous, hence sequentially continuous, function of the measurable maps ( t , Ο ) β¦ t (t,\omega)\mapsto t ( t , Ο ) β¦ t (the preimage of a Borel set B B B being the rectangle B Γ Ξ© B\times\Omega B Γ Ξ© ) and ( t , Ο ) β¦ 1 Ξ© 1 ( Ο ) β z t i ( Ο ) (t,\omega)\mapsto\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_1}(\omega)\,z^i_t(\omega) ( t , Ο ) β¦ 1 Ξ© 1 β β ( Ο ) z t i β ( Ο ) of (i), and is therefore product-measurable by measurability of sequentially continuous functions of measurable Euclidean maps ; its positive and negative parts ( 1 Ξ© 1 Ο ) + (\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_1}\psi)^{+} ( 1 Ξ© 1 β β Ο ) + and ( 1 Ξ© 1 Ο ) β (\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_1}\psi)^{-} ( 1 Ξ© 1 β β Ο ) β are product-measurable in turn, being its compositions with the continuous functions u β¦ max β‘ ( u , 0 ) u\mapsto\max(u,0) u β¦ max ( u , 0 ) and u β¦ max β‘ ( β u , 0 ) u\mapsto\max(-u,0) u β¦ max ( β u , 0 ) , again by the same lemma . Fix a real number C C C with 1 2 β i = 1 l + m β j = 1 l + m β£ H i j ( t ) β£ β€ C \tfrac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^{l+m}\sum_{j=1}^{l+m}|H_{ij}(t)|\le C 2 1 β β i = 1 l + m β β j = 1 l + m β β£ H ij β ( t ) β£ β€ C for all t β [ 0 , T ] t\in[0,T] t β [ 0 , T ] , which exists by the boundedness of each H i j H_{ij} H ij β recorded above; then β£ 1 Ξ© 1 Ο t β£ β€ C β 1 Ξ© 1 ( β£ x t β£ 2 + β£ a t β£ 2 ) |\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_1}\psi_t|\le C\,\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_1}\big(|x_t|^2+|a_t|^2\big) β£ 1 Ξ© 1 β β Ο t β β£ β€ C 1 Ξ© 1 β β ( β£ x t β β£ 2 + β£ a t β β£ 2 ) on [ 0 , T ] Γ Ξ© [0,T]\times\Omega [ 0 , T ] Γ Ξ© , since β£ z t i β z t j β£ β€ β£ x t β£ 2 + β£ a t β£ 2 |z^i_t\,z^j_t|\le|x_t|^2+|a_t|^2 β£ z t i β z t j β β£ β€ β£ x t β β£ 2 + β£ a t β β£ 2 for all i , j i,j i , j .
By the Tonelli theorem applied to the product-measurable map of (ii), Ξ¦ ( Ο ) = β« [ 0 , T ] 1 Ξ© 1 ( Ο ) ( β£ x t ( Ο ) β£ 2 + β£ a t ( Ο ) β£ 2 ) β d t \Phi(\omega)=\int_{[0,T]}\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_1}(\omega)\big(|x_t(\omega)|^2+|a_t(\omega)|^2\big)\,dt Ξ¦ ( Ο ) = β« [ 0 , T ] β 1 Ξ© 1 β β ( Ο ) ( β£ x t β ( Ο ) β£ 2 + β£ a t β ( Ο ) β£ 2 ) d t defines a measurable [ 0 , β ] [0,\infty] [ 0 , β ] -valued function of Ο \omega Ο ; for Ο β Ξ© 1 \omega\in\Omega_1 Ο β Ξ© 1 β the section being integrated is exactly t β¦ β£ x t ( Ο ) β£ 2 + β£ a t ( Ο ) β£ 2 t\mapsto|x_t(\omega)|^2+|a_t(\omega)|^2 t β¦ β£ x t β ( Ο ) β£ 2 + β£ a t β ( Ο ) β£ 2 , since 1 Ξ© 1 ( Ο ) = 1 \mathbf{1}_{\Omega_1}(\omega)=1 1 Ξ© 1 β β ( Ο ) = 1 . Let Ξ© 2 = Ξ© 1 β© { Ο β Ξ© : Ξ¦ ( Ο ) < β } \Omega_2=\Omega_1\cap\{\omega\in\Omega:\Phi(\omega)<\infty\} Ξ© 2 β = Ξ© 1 β β© { Ο β Ξ© : Ξ¦ ( Ο ) < β } ; by (i) alone Ξ© 2 \Omega_2 Ξ© 2 β is an event, and by (ii) it has probability 1 1 1 : E [ Ξ¦ ] \mathbb{E}[\Phi] E [ Ξ¦ ] equals the finite quantity of (ii) by the Tonelli theorem, while for every natural number n n n we have Ξ¦ β₯ n β 1 { Ξ¦ = β } \Phi\ge n\,\mathbf{1}_{\{\Phi=\infty\}} Ξ¦ β₯ n 1 { Ξ¦ = β } β pointwise, so E [ Ξ¦ ] β₯ n β P ( Ξ¦ = β ) \mathbb{E}[\Phi]\ge n\,\mathbb{P}(\Phi=\infty) E [ Ξ¦ ] β₯ n P ( Ξ¦ = β ) by monotonicity and the integral of a simple function , which forces P ( Ξ¦ = β ) = 0 \mathbb{P}(\Phi=\infty)=0 P ( Ξ¦ = β ) = 0 . At each Ο β Ξ© 2 \omega\in\Omega_2 Ο β Ξ© 2 β the section t β¦ Ο t ( Ο ) t\mapsto\psi_t(\omega) t β¦ Ο t β ( Ο ) is measurable, being the difference of the sections at Ο \omega Ο of ( 1 Ξ© 1 Ο ) + (\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_1}\psi)^{+} ( 1 Ξ© 1 β β Ο ) + and ( 1 Ξ© 1 Ο ) β (\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_1}\psi)^{-} ( 1 Ξ© 1 β β Ο ) β (sections of product-measurable [ 0 , β ] [0,\infty] [ 0 , β ] -valued maps are measurable, as in the Tonelli theorem ), and it is Lebesgue integrable over [ 0 , T ] [0,T] [ 0 , T ] , being measurable with β« [ 0 , T ] β£ Ο t ( Ο ) β£ β d t β€ C β Ξ¦ ( Ο ) < β \int_{[0,T]}|\psi_t(\omega)|\,dt\le C\,\Phi(\omega)<\infty β« [ 0 , T ] β β£ Ο t β ( Ο ) β£ d t β€ C Ξ¦ ( Ο ) < β by monotonicity and the definition of integrability .
The fluctuation linear-quadratic cost of the pair ( ( x ) , ( a ) ) ((x),(a)) (( x ) , ( a )) relative to the stationary mean-field triple ( S , A , P ) (S,A,P) ( S , A , P ) and the chosen extensions is the real number
L Q G [ ( x ) , ( a ) ] = E [ I ] + E [ 1 2 β Ξ³ = 1 l β Ξ΄ = 1 l F Ξ³ Ξ΄ β x T Ξ³ β x T Ξ΄ ] , LQG\big[(x),(a)\big]=\mathbb{E}[I]+\mathbb{E}\Big[\tfrac{1}{2}\sum_{\gamma=1}^{l}\sum_{\delta=1}^{l}F_{\gamma\delta}\,x^\gamma_T\,x^\delta_T\Big], L QG [ ( x ) , ( a ) ] = E [ I ] + E [ 2 1 β Ξ³ = 1 β l β Ξ΄ = 1 β l β F Ξ³ Ξ΄ β x T Ξ³ β x T Ξ΄ β ] ,
where I I I is the random variable that vanishes off Ξ© 2 \Omega_2 Ξ© 2 β and at each Ο β Ξ© 2 \omega\in\Omega_2 Ο β Ξ© 2 β equals the Lebesgue integral β« [ 0 , T ] Ο t ( Ο ) β d t \int_{[0,T]}\psi_t(\omega)\,dt β« [ 0 , T ] β Ο t β ( Ο ) d t of the preceding paragraph, and both expectations are expectations on ( Ξ© , F , P ) (\Omega,\mathcal{F},\mathbb{P}) ( Ξ© , F , P ) . Both expectations are well defined and finite. Indeed, by the Tonelli theorem the integrals over [ 0 , T ] [0,T] [ 0 , T ] of ( 1 Ξ© 1 Ο ) + (\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_1}\psi)^{+} ( 1 Ξ© 1 β β Ο ) + and ( 1 Ξ© 1 Ο ) β (\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_1}\psi)^{-} ( 1 Ξ© 1 β β Ο ) β define measurable [ 0 , β ] [0,\infty] [ 0 , β ] -valued functions of Ο \omega Ο , each at most C β Ξ¦ C\,\Phi C Ξ¦ pointwise by monotonicity , hence finite at every Ο β Ξ© 2 \omega\in\Omega_2 Ο β Ξ© 2 β ; for each of the two, the function equal to it on Ξ© 2 \Omega_2 Ξ© 2 β and to 0 0 0 off Ξ© 2 \Omega_2 Ξ© 2 β is a random variable, Ξ© 2 \Omega_2 Ξ© 2 β being an event, and I I I is the difference of these two random variables. Moreover β£ I β£ β€ C β Ξ¦ |I|\le C\,\Phi β£ I β£ β€ C Ξ¦ pointwise and E [ Ξ¦ ] < β \mathbb{E}[\Phi]<\infty E [ Ξ¦ ] < β , so I I I is integrable and E [ I ] \mathbb{E}[I] E [ I ] is defined and finite, again by monotonicity. The terminal random variable 1 2 β Ξ³ = 1 l β Ξ΄ = 1 l F Ξ³ Ξ΄ β x T Ξ³ β x T Ξ΄ \tfrac{1}{2}\sum_{\gamma=1}^{l}\sum_{\delta=1}^{l}F_{\gamma\delta}\,x^\gamma_T\,x^\delta_T 2 1 β β Ξ³ = 1 l β β Ξ΄ = 1 l β F Ξ³ Ξ΄ β x T Ξ³ β x T Ξ΄ β is measurable by measurability of continuous functions of measurable maps , and its absolute value is at most 1 2 ( β Ξ³ , Ξ΄ β£ F Ξ³ Ξ΄ β£ ) β£ x T β£ 2 \tfrac{1}{2}\big(\sum_{\gamma,\delta}|F_{\gamma\delta}|\big)|x_T|^2 2 1 β ( β Ξ³ , Ξ΄ β β£ F Ξ³ Ξ΄ β β£ ) β£ x T β β£ 2 , which has finite expectation by (iii); so it is integrable and its expectation is defined and finite, by monotonicity once more. Finally, the value of L Q G [ ( x ) , ( a ) ] LQG[(x),(a)] L QG [( x ) , ( a )] does not depend on the admissible choice of Ξ© 1 \Omega_1 Ξ© 1 β : if Ξ© 1 β² \Omega_1' Ξ© 1 β² β is another event as in (i), with associated Ξ© 2 β² \Omega_2' Ξ© 2 β² β and I β² I' I β² , then Ξ© 2 β© Ξ© 2 β² \Omega_2\cap\Omega_2' Ξ© 2 β β© Ξ© 2 β² β has probability 1 1 1 and the two prescriptions agree there, so the nonnegative random variable β£ I β I β² β£ |I-I'| β£ I β I β² β£ vanishes off an event of probability zero and has expectation 0 0 0 by the domination argument of (ii), whence β£ E [ I ] β E [ I β² ] β£ = β£ E [ I β I β² ] β£ β€ E [ β£ I β I β² β£ ] = 0 |\mathbb{E}[I]-\mathbb{E}[I']|=\big|\mathbb{E}[I-I']\big|\le\mathbb{E}\big[|I-I'|\big]=0 β£ E [ I ] β E [ I β² ] β£ = β E [ I β I β² ] β β€ E [ β£ I β I β² β£ ] = 0 by the basic integral laws .