TheoremBase

Comparison and Uniqueness under Wasserstein Semicontinuity for Free-Energy-Penalised Viscosity Solutions of the Discounted HJB Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall

If the Hamiltonian satisfies the structure condition at bounded positions and is uniformly continuous in the momentum there, a bounded penalised subsolution that is Wasserstein upper semicontinuous on the domain of the wall-confined free energy lies below a bounded Wasserstein lower semicontinuous penalised supersolution there; solutions continuous there are unique.

Statement

In the setting of The Discounted Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall on Noncommutative Laws: Standing Notation, consider the equation (E)(\mathrm{E}) of The Discounted Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall on Noncommutative Laws §score-form, let RR be the wall radius of The Discounted Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall on Noncommutative Laws: Standing Notation §parameters and D\mathcal{D} the domain of the wall-confined free energy as in The Discounted Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall on Noncommutative Laws: Standing Notation §free-energy, and assume that the Hamiltonian H\mathcal{H} of The Discounted Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall on Noncommutative Laws: Standing Notation §hamiltonian satisfies the structure condition at bounded positions and is uniformly continuous in the momentum at bounded positions. Semicontinuity on D\mathcal{D} refers to the metric space (Σd,R,W2)(\Sigma_{d,R},W_{2}) of The Noncommutative Laws with a Norm Bound Form a Complete Bounded Metric Space with Interpolation Points, which contains D\mathcal{D} by The Wall-Confined Free Energy: Norm Bound, Lower Bound, Weak-Star Compact Sublevel Sets and Displacement Monotonicity of the Score §bounds.

1. (Comparison) Let u,v:Σd2→Ru,v:\Sigma^{2}_{d}\to\mathbb{R} be bounded; let uu be a free-energy-penalised viscosity subsolution of (E)(\mathrm{E}) such that the function μ↦u(κd(μ))\mu\mapsto u(\kappa_{d}(\mu)) on D\mathcal{D} is upper semicontinuous on D\mathcal{D}, and let vv be a free-energy-penalised viscosity supersolution of (E)(\mathrm{E}) such that the function μ↦v(κd(μ))\mu\mapsto v(\kappa_{d}(\mu)) on D\mathcal{D} is lower semicontinuous on D\mathcal{D}. Then u(κd(μ))≤v(κd(μ))u(\kappa_{d}(\mu))\le v(\kappa_{d}(\mu)) for every μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}.

2. (Uniqueness) Let u,v:Σd2→Ru,v:\Sigma^{2}_{d}\to\mathbb{R} be bounded free-energy-penalised viscosity solutions of (E)(\mathrm{E}) such that the functions μ↦u(κd(μ))\mu\mapsto u(\kappa_{d}(\mu)) and μ↦v(κd(μ))\mu\mapsto v(\kappa_{d}(\mu)) on D\mathcal{D} are both upper semicontinuous and lower semicontinuous on D\mathcal{D}. Then u(κd(μ))=v(κd(μ))u(\kappa_{d}(\mu))=v(\kappa_{d}(\mu)) for every μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…