Reason: S4.2: regularity, derivative formulas, explicit first/second-order bounds, uniform continuity, and simplex restriction for the extended aggregate state drift. Internally reviewed; constants verified.
Statement
Let l and m be \reftext{def:natural-numbers-2026a}{natural numbers} with l≥2 and m≥1, let β be a \reftext{def:transition-rate-family-2026a}{transition-rate family} on l states with control dimension m and rate bound B, let (U,βˉ) be a \reftext{def:c2-transition-rate-extension-2026a}{twice continuously differentiable extension} of β with derivative bound K, and let bˉ be the \reftext{def:extended-aggregate-state-drift-2026a}{extended aggregate state drift} of (U,βˉ). Adopt the coordinate and partial-derivative notation ∂i, ∂j∂i of the extension definition, write Δl for the \reftext{def:probability-simplex-2026a}{probability simplex}, write d for the \reftext{def:euclidean-distance-rn-2026a}{Euclidean distance}, and for i∈{1,…,l+m} and σ∈{1,…,l} set δiσ=1 if i=σ and δiσ=0 otherwise. Then for every γ∈{1,…,l}:
\textbf{(i) (Regularity, derivative formulas, and restriction.)} bˉγ is a \reftext{def:c1-map-euclidean-open-set-2026a}{C1 map} on U×Rm, each ∂ibˉγ is again a C1 map on U×Rm, and for all i,j∈{1,…,l+m} and x=(Σ,α)∈U×Rm:
Moreover bˉ agrees on Δl×Rm with the \reftext{def:aggregate-state-drift-2026a}{aggregate state drift} of β.
\textbf{(ii) (First-order bounds on the simplex.)} ∣∂ibˉγ(x)∣≤l(B+K) for all i∈{1,…,l+m} and all x∈Δl×Rm, and
∣bˉγ(x)−bˉγ(y)∣≤l+ml(B+K)d(x,y)for all x,y∈Δl×Rm.
\textbf{(iii) (Second-order bounds and uniform continuity on the simplex.)} ∣∂j∂ibˉγ(x)∣≤3lK for all i,j∈{1,…,l+m} and x∈Δl×Rm; and for every real ε>0 there is a real δ>0 such that ∣∂j∂ibˉγ(x)−∂j∂ibˉγ(y)∣≤ε for all i,j∈{1,…,l+m}, all γ∈{1,…,l}, and all x,y∈Δl×Rm with d(x,y)≤δ.
Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.