TheoremBase

Regularity and Derivative Bounds of the Extended Aggregate State Drift

Statement

Let ll and mm be natural numbers with l≥2l\ge2 and m≥1m\ge1, let A\mathcal{A} be a nonempty subset of Euclidean space Rm\mathbb{R}^m, let β\beta be a transition-rate family on ll states with control set A\mathcal{A} and rate bound BB, let (U,V,βˉ)(U,V,\bar{\beta}) be a twice continuously differentiable extension of β\beta with derivative bound KK, and let bˉ\bar{b} be the extended aggregate state drift of (U,V,βˉ)(U,V,\bar{\beta}). Adopt the coordinate and partial-derivative notation ∂i\partial_i, ∂j∂i\partial_j\partial_i of the extension definition, write Δl\Delta^l for the probability simplex, write dd for the Euclidean distance, and for i∈{1,…,l+m}i\in\{1,\dots,l+m\} and σ∈{1,…,l}\sigma\in\{1,\dots,l\} set δiσ=1\delta_{i\sigma}=1 if i=σi=\sigma and δiσ=0\delta_{i\sigma}=0 otherwise. Then for every γ∈{1,…,l}\gamma\in\{1,\dots,l\}:

(i) (Regularity, derivative formulas, and restriction.) bˉγ\bar{b}^\gamma is of class C2C^2 on U×VU\times V, which is an open subset of Rl+m\mathbb{R}^{l+m} as noted in clause 2 of the extension definition; in particular each ∂ibˉγ\partial_i\bar{b}^\gamma exists and is of class C1C^1 on U×VU\times V, and for all i,j∈{1,…,l+m}i,j\in\{1,\dots,l+m\} and x=(Σ,α)∈U×Vx=(\Sigma,\alpha)\in U\times V:

∂ibˉγ(x)=∑σ:σ≠γ(δiσ βˉ(σ,γ,x)+Σσ ∂iβˉ(σ,γ,x)−δiγ βˉ(γ,σ,x)−Σγ ∂iβˉ(γ,σ,x)),\partial_i\bar{b}^\gamma(x)=\sum_{\sigma:\sigma\neq\gamma}\Big(\delta_{i\sigma}\,\bar{\beta}(\sigma,\gamma,x)+\Sigma^\sigma\,\partial_i\bar{\beta}(\sigma,\gamma,x)-\delta_{i\gamma}\,\bar{\beta}(\gamma,\sigma,x)-\Sigma^\gamma\,\partial_i\bar{\beta}(\gamma,\sigma,x)\Big), ∂j∂ibˉγ(x)=∑σ:σ≠γ(δiσ ∂jβˉ(σ,γ,x)+δjσ ∂iβˉ(σ,γ,x)+Σσ ∂j∂iβˉ(σ,γ,x)−δiγ ∂jβˉ(γ,σ,x)−δjγ ∂iβˉ(γ,σ,x)−Σγ ∂j∂iβˉ(γ,σ,x)).\partial_j\partial_i\bar{b}^\gamma(x)=\sum_{\sigma:\sigma\neq\gamma}\Big(\delta_{i\sigma}\,\partial_j\bar{\beta}(\sigma,\gamma,x)+\delta_{j\sigma}\,\partial_i\bar{\beta}(\sigma,\gamma,x)+\Sigma^\sigma\,\partial_j\partial_i\bar{\beta}(\sigma,\gamma,x)-\delta_{i\gamma}\,\partial_j\bar{\beta}(\gamma,\sigma,x)-\delta_{j\gamma}\,\partial_i\bar{\beta}(\gamma,\sigma,x)-\Sigma^\gamma\,\partial_j\partial_i\bar{\beta}(\gamma,\sigma,x)\Big).

Moreover bˉ\bar{b} agrees on Δl×A\Delta^l\times\mathcal{A} with the aggregate state drift of β\beta.

(ii) (First-order bounds.) ∣∂ibˉγ(x)∣≤l (B+K)|\partial_i\bar{b}^\gamma(x)|\le l\,(B+K) for all i∈{1,…,l+m}i\in\{1,\dots,l+m\} and all x∈Δl×Ax\in\Delta^l\times\mathcal{A}; and if in addition A\mathcal{A} is convex, then

∣bˉγ(x)−bˉγ(y)∣≤l+m  l (B+K)  d(x,y)for all x,y∈Δl×A.|\bar{b}^\gamma(x)-\bar{b}^\gamma(y)|\le \sqrt{l+m}\;l\,(B+K)\;d(x,y)\qquad\text{for all }x,y\in\Delta^l\times\mathcal{A}.

(iii) (Second-order bounds and uniform continuity.) ∣∂j∂ibˉγ(x)∣≤3 l K|\partial_j\partial_i\bar{b}^\gamma(x)|\le 3\,l\,K for all i,j∈{1,…,l+m}i,j\in\{1,\dots,l+m\} and x∈Δl×Vx\in\Delta^l\times V; and for every real ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is a real δ>0\delta>0 such that ∣∂j∂ibˉγ(x)−∂j∂ibˉγ(y)∣≤ε|\partial_j\partial_i\bar{b}^\gamma(x)-\partial_j\partial_i\bar{b}^\gamma(y)|\le\varepsilon for all i,j∈{1,…,l+m}i,j\in\{1,\dots,l+m\}, all γ∈{1,…,l}\gamma\in\{1,\dots,l\}, and all x,y∈Δl×Vx,y\in\Delta^l\times V with d(x,y)≤δd(x,y)\le\delta.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…