TheoremBase

Perron's Method: Existence of a Viscosity Solution of the Dirichlet Problem

If comparison holds for the Dirichlet problem and there are a bounded subsolution and a bounded supersolution whose envelopes attain the boundary data, then the supremum of all subsolutions between them is a viscosity solution of the Dirichlet problem.

Statement

Throughout we work in the setting of Second-Order Equations on Euclidean Open Sets, whose notation, including that of Euclidean Space and Real Matrices: Standing Notation and Differential Calculus and Convexity on Euclidean Open Sets: Standing Notation on which it rests, is in force in a dimension nn, a natural number with 1≤n1\le n.

Let Ω⊆Rn\Omega\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{n} be open and nonempty, with closure Ω‾\overline{\Omega} and boundary ∂Ω\partial\Omega as in Viscosity Sub- and Supersolutions and Solutions of the Dirichlet Problem. Let FF be a second-order equation operator on Ω\Omega that is continuous and degenerate elliptic, and let g:∂Ω→Rg:\partial\Omega\to\mathbb{R}. For a function h:Ω‾→Rh:\overline{\Omega}\to\mathbb{R} that is bounded above and below near each point of Ω‾\overline{\Omega}, we write h∗h^{*} and h∗h_{*} for its upper and lower semicontinuous envelopes on Ω‾\overline{\Omega}.

Assume the following two hypotheses.

1. (Comparison holds for the Dirichlet problem) Every viscosity subsolution w‾\underline{w} and every viscosity supersolution w‾\overline{w} of the Dirichlet problem (F,g)(F,g) satisfy w‾(x)≤w‾(x)\underline{w}(x)\le\overline{w}(x) for every x∈Ω‾x\in\overline{\Omega}.

2. (Bounded barriers attaining the boundary data) There are a viscosity subsolution u‾\underline{u} and a viscosity supersolution u‾\overline{u} of (F,g)(F,g) and a real number MM such that ∣u‾(x)∣≤M|\underline{u}(x)|\le M and ∣u‾(x)∣≤M|\overline{u}(x)|\le M for every x∈Ω‾x\in\overline{\Omega}, and such that

u‾∗(x)=g(x)=u‾∗(x)for every x∈∂Ω.\underline{u}_{*}(x)=g(x)=\overline{u}^{*}(x)\qquad\text{for every }x\in\partial\Omega .

Let G\mathcal{G} be the set of all viscosity subsolutions w‾\underline{w} of (F,g)(F,g) satisfying u‾(x)≤w‾(x)\underline{u}(x)\le\underline{w}(x) and w‾(x)≤u‾(x)\underline{w}(x)\le\overline{u}(x) for every x∈Ω‾x\in\overline{\Omega}. By hypothesis 1 above, applied to u‾\underline{u} and u‾\overline{u} we have u‾(x)≤u‾(x)\underline{u}(x)\le\overline{u}(x) for every x∈Ω‾x\in\overline{\Omega}, so u‾∈G\underline{u}\in\mathcal{G} and G\mathcal{G} is nonempty; and for x∈Ω‾x\in\overline{\Omega} the set {w‾(x):w‾∈G}\{\underline{w}(x):\underline{w}\in\mathcal{G}\} is nonempty and bounded above by u‾(x)\overline{u}(x), so it has a least upper bound by Least Upper Bound Property of the Real Numbers, unique by Uniqueness of the Supremum and of the Infimum. Let W:Ω‾→RW:\overline{\Omega}\to\mathbb{R} be given by

W(x)=sup⁡{w‾(x):w‾∈G}for x∈Ω‾.W(x)=\sup\{\underline{w}(x):\underline{w}\in\mathcal{G}\}\qquad\text{for }x\in\overline{\Omega}.

Then WW is a viscosity solution of the Dirichlet problem (F,g)(F,g).

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…