Filtering Lower-Bound Reduction of the Recentred N-Agent Cost
lemmaProbabilitylem:n-agent-cost-filtering-reduction-2026bFix the following common data: a transition-rate family on states with control set , a nonempty subset of Euclidean space , and rate bound , an observation-rate family with channels, a horizon , a twice continuously differentiable extension of with derivative bound , a twice continuously differentiable extension of population cost data with second-derivative bound — its open set, written in the second-order expansion theorem below, is written here as in the completion-of-squares theorem, the letter being reserved for the matrices —, a mean-field trajectory pair for with horizon , and a stationary co-state for these data, so that is a stationary mean-field triple. Assume the control set is convex. Let be the aggregate fluctuation covariance of and write .
For each natural number , let there be given an -agent driving system, an observation-driven control policy with horizon , control dimension , and channels, which is -valued, and a solution of the controlled -agent dynamics on for these data, with regular event, empirical state measure , control , and observation filtration as in the solution definition. Adopt, for the -th solution, the setting and notation of the completion-of-squares theorem: the fluctuation processes and , the -agent cost , the mean-field cost , the vector , remainder , Euclidean distance and norm of the second-order expansion, the fluctuation linear-quadratic cost , the coefficient matrices , , , , , — the time-indexed matrices and being unrelated to the control-side open set of , and the sans-serif distinct from the rate bound —, the entry pairing , the quantities and , and the constants , , , of those theorems, none of which depends on — and depend only on the common data, and and also on the Riccati family fixed in hypothesis (H2) below, itself independent of — (the letters and of the adopted setting retain their meanings there as scalar constants and are not used below). Throughout, a real-valued function on a subinterval of the real numbers is called continuous on when it is continuous relative to , both and the codomain carrying the metric of the real line. Assume hypotheses (H1)--(H2) of the completion-of-squares theorem — its integrability hypothesis , the subscripted being distinct from the control set , is verified, for each , in conclusion (a) below —, with the Riccati family and fixed throughout, and set, for the -th solution, as there, and
Assume moreover, with the expectation:
(M) (Uniform fourth moments.) There is a real such that for every and every , and , the expectations of these nonnegative random variables being taken in .
(I) (Initial covariance convergence.) There is a symmetric real matrix with rows and columns such that for all the real sequence has limit .
Then:
(a) (Applicability and vanishing error.) For every and , and ; in particular the energy of the adopted setting (the quantity there) satisfies , so every hypothesis of the second-order expansion and of the completion-of-squares theorem holds for the -th solution, and both apply to it. Moreover the real number defined by the identity
in which every term is a well-defined real number --- the last integral being the Lebesgue integral over the compact interval of a bounded measurable function: each is continuous and bounded by clause (c) of the covariance deviation lemma, each entry is continuous and bounded by conclusion (a) of the completion-of-squares theorem and hypothesis (H2), the integrand is then continuous by continuity of sums and products, and a continuous function on is measurable with well-defined finite Lebesgue integral by clause 3 of the toolkit --- satisfies: the real sequence has limit .
(b) (Filtering bound.) Set , a symmetric positive semidefinite real matrix with rows and columns for every . For every and every : the components of and of are square-integrable; each component of is almost surely equal to a -measurable square-integrable random variable, by the observation-adaptedness lemma; and for every choice of conditional expectations (), which exist by the existence and uniqueness theorem, the filtering error with components satisfies
the middle quantity being independent of the choice of conditional expectations.
(c) (Lower bound.) For every real there is a natural number such that for every :
Conclusion (b) bounds the integrand of the last integral pointwise in ; conclusion (c) is deliberately stated in terms of that integral, no measurability in of the filtering-error term being asserted.
Loading…
Prerequisites
No prerequisites tracked.
Dependents
No dependents yet.
Dependent proofs
No dependent proofs yet.
No relations recorded yet.