TheoremBase

Grouping Independence and the Fresh-Start Sigma-Algebra of an Independent-Increment Process

Statement

Let (Ω,F,P)(\Omega,\mathcal{F},P) be a probability space.

(a) (Grouping.) Let q≥1q\ge1 be a natural number, let ξ1,…,ξq\xi_1,\dots,\xi_q be independent random variables on (Ω,F,P)(\Omega,\mathcal{F},P), and let II and JJ be disjoint subsets of {1,…,q}\{1,\dots,q\}. Then the σ\sigma-algebras σ(ξh:h∈I)\sigma(\xi_h:h\in I) and σ(ξh:h∈J)\sigma(\xi_h:h\in J), each generated by the indicated random variables (with the convention that the σ\sigma-algebra generated by the empty collection is {∅,Ω}\{\varnothing,\Omega\}), are independent in the sense of independence of σ\sigma-algebras.

(b) (Fresh start.) Let X=(Xt)t≥0X=(X_t)_{t\ge0} be a stochastic process on (Ω,F,P)(\Omega,\mathcal{F},P) with independent increments, suppose there is a real number cc with X0=cX_0=c almost surely, let (FtX)t≥0(\mathcal{F}^X_t)_{t\ge0} be the natural filtration of XX, and fix a real number r≥0r\ge0. Then the σ\sigma-algebra

σ(Xr+u−Xr: u≥0),\sigma\big(X_{r+u}-X_r:\ u\ge0\big),

generated by all post-rr increments, is independent of FrX\mathcal{F}^X_r in the sense of independence of σ\sigma-algebras.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…