TheoremBase

Sign Reversal for Second-Order Equations on a Hilbert Triple: Subsolutions of FF are Supersolutions of F~\tilde F

With F̃(x,r,p,X) = −F(x,−r,−p,−X): F̃ is degenerate elliptic iff F is, the δ-shifts of F̃ are the negated δ-shifts of F at negated data, and u is a classical or viscosity subsolution of F iff −u is a classical or viscosity supersolution of F̃ (and conversely), so every statement about supersolutions follows from its subsolution counterpart.

Statement

In the setting of Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background, let U⊆HU\subseteq H be nonempty and open in HH, with W=D(A)∩UW=D(A)\cap U and C2(U)C^{2}(U) as in Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background (v), and let FF be a second-order equation operator on UU relative to (H,V,A)(H,V,A). For a form XX on VV or on HH, −X-X is the form (−1)X(-1)X of Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background (vi), with (−Y)∣V=−(Y∣V)(-Y)|_{V}=-(Y|_{V}) for Y∈Sym(H)Y\in\mathrm{Sym}(H) and ∥−Y∥=∥Y∥\lVert -Y\rVert=\lVert Y\rVert by Elementary Properties of Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms: Norm, Quadratic Form, Order and Continuity (x) and Elementary Properties of Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms: Norm, Quadratic Form, Order and Continuity (iii); for a function uu on UU, −u-u is the function with value −u(x)-u(x) at xx, and for u∈C2(U)u\in C^{2}(U) one has −u∈C2(U)-u\in C^{2}(U) with D(−u)(x)=−Du(x)D(-u)(x)=-Du(x) and D2(−u)(x)=−D2u(x)D^{2}(-u)(x)=-D^{2}u(x) for x∈Ux\in U by Constants, Sums, Scalar Multiples and Differences of Differentiable Functions on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space (iii). For δ>0\delta>0 the δ\delta-envelopes of uu and of −u-u are related by Basic Properties of the δ\delta-Envelopes: Semicontinuity, Duality, Closed Superlevel Sets, Bounds and Monotonicity (ii). Define F~:W×R×H×Sym(V)→R\tilde{F}:W\times\mathbb{R}\times H\times\mathrm{Sym}(V)\to\mathbb{R} by

F~(x,r,p,X)=−F(x,−r,−p,−X).\tilde{F}(x,r,p,X)=-F(x,-r,-p,-X).

Then the following hold.

1. (Operator) F~\tilde{F} is a second-order equation operator on UU relative to (H,V,A)(H,V,A), and applying the same construction to F~\tilde{F} returns FF.

2. (Ellipticity) F~\tilde{F} is degenerate elliptic if and only if FF is.

3. (Shifts) For every real δ>0\delta>0 and every (x,r,p,Y)∈W×R×H×Sym(H)(x,r,p,Y)\in W\times\mathbb{R}\times H\times\mathrm{Sym}(H), the δ\delta-shifts satisfy

F~δ+(x,r,p,Y)=−Fδ−(x,−r,−p,−Y)andF~δ−(x,r,p,Y)=−Fδ+(x,−r,−p,−Y).\tilde{F}^{+}_{\delta}(x,r,p,Y)=-F^{-}_{\delta}(x,-r,-p,-Y)\qquad\text{and}\qquad \tilde{F}^{-}_{\delta}(x,r,p,Y)=-F^{+}_{\delta}(x,-r,-p,-Y).

4. (Classical solutions) Let u∈C2(U)u\in C^{2}(U). Then uu is a classical subsolution of FF on UU if and only if −u-u is a classical supersolution of F~\tilde{F} on UU; uu is a classical supersolution of FF on UU if and only if −u-u is a classical subsolution of F~\tilde{F} on UU; and uu is a classical solution of FF on UU if and only if −u-u is a classical solution of F~\tilde{F} on UU.

5. (Viscosity solutions) Let u:U→Ru:U\to\mathbb{R}. Then uu is a viscosity subsolution of FF on UU if and only if −u-u is a viscosity supersolution of F~\tilde{F} on UU; uu is a viscosity supersolution of FF on UU if and only if −u-u is a viscosity subsolution of F~\tilde{F} on UU; and uu is a viscosity solution of FF on UU if and only if −u-u is a viscosity solution of F~\tilde{F} on UU. In each equivalence the local boundedness required of uu by the one definition holds if and only if that required of −u-u by the other holds.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…