Reason: First published version. Shows that composing an affine-controlled rate family with the projection onto the control set yields a transition-rate family in the published sense, and records the affine form, bounds, Lipschitz constants, conservation and inflow bound of the resulting drift.
for each ordered pair (σ,γ) with σ=γ in {1,…,l}. Let
R=α∈Asup∣α∣,K1=sup∣β1(σ,γ,Σ)∣,B=supβ(σ,γ,Σ,α),
the latter suprema being over all ordered pairs (σ,γ) with σ=γ, all Σ∈Δl and all α∈Rm, and set Λβ=Λ(1+R) and Λb=2l(l−1)(B+Λβ).
1. (Finiteness.) The projections πA and πΔl are defined, and R, K1, B are finite nonnegative real numbers.
2. (Transition-rate family.)β is a transition-rate family on l states with control dimension m and rate bound B. Moreover β(σ,γ,Σ,α)=β0(σ,γ,Σ)+β1(σ,γ,Σ)⋅α whenever α∈A, and for each fixed α∈Rm the map Σ↦β(σ,γ,Σ,α) is Lipschitz with constant Λβ on Δl.
3. (Affine drift.) Let b be the aggregate state drift of β, and define, for Σ∈Δl and γ∈{1,…,l},
5. (Conservation and inflow bound.) For all Σ∈Δl, α∈Rm and γ,
γ=1∑lbγ(Σ,α)=0,bγ(Σ,α)≥−(l−1)BΣγ.
6. (Projected drift.) Define b^:Rl×Rm→Rl by b^(x,α)=b(πΔl(x),α). Then b^(x,α)=b(x,α) for x∈Δl, ∣b^(x,α)∣≤2l(l−1)B for all x∈Rl and α∈Rm, and ∣b^(x,α)−b^(x′,α)∣≤Λb∣x−x′∣ for all x,x′∈Rl and α∈Rm.
Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.