Let l and m be natural numbers with l≥2 and m≥1, let (L,G) be population cost data on l states with control dimension m, and let Δl be the probability simplex. Let T>0 be a real number, adopt the notation of the Lebesgue space L2([0,T];Rd) in the case d=m, write H=L2([0,T];Rm) with its pairing, norm ∥⋅∥L2 and metric dL2, and write λ=λ[0,T] and B=B[0,T]. Write ∣⋅∣ for the Euclidean norm on Rk, for any natural number k≥1, and for the absolute value on R.
Let A be a nonempty convex subset of Rm that is compact for the topology determined by the Euclidean distance, and let UA be the set of A-valued controls. Assume in addition that L is convex in the control on A, that is, that for every Σ∈Δl the function A→R sending a to L(Σ,a) is convex on A.
Call a map S:[0,T]→Rl an admissible state path if St∈Δl for every t∈[0,T] and each component of S is measurable from ([0,T],B) to R with its Borel σ-algebra. Then the following hold.
1. (The running-cost integral is well defined.) Let S be an admissible state path and let ξ∈UA. Then ξ has at least one representative whose values all lie in A; denoting such a representative again by ξ, as in claim 5 of the Lebesgue space, the map t↦L(St,ξ(t)) is measurable and bounded, hence integrable, and the value
ΦS(ξ)=∫[0,T]L(St,ξ(t))dλ(t),
called the running-cost integral of ξ along S, does not depend on the choice of such a representative. Moreover there is a real number C≥0, depending only on L, Δl and A, with ∣ΦS(ξ)∣≤CT for every admissible state path S and every ξ∈UA; consequently, for any sequence (Sn)n∈N of admissible state paths and any sequence (ξn)n∈N in UA, the real sequence (ΦSn(ξn))n∈N is a bounded sequence, so its limit inferior is defined.
2. (Convex closed sublevel sets.) Let S be an admissible state path and let M be a real number. The set CM={ξ∈UA:ΦS(ξ)≤M} is a convex subset of H and is closed for the topology of metric open subsets determined by dL2.
3. (Weak lower semicontinuity.) Let S be an admissible state path, let (ξn)n∈N be a sequence in UA, let ξ∈H with ξn⇀ξ in the sense of weak convergence. Then ξ∈UA and
ΦS(ξ)≤nliminfΦS(ξn).
4. (Uniformly convergent states.) Let S and Sn (n∈N) be admissible state paths such that for every real ε>0 there is N∈N with ∣Stn−St∣≤ε for every t∈[0,T] and every n≥N, let (ξn)n∈N be a sequence in UA with ξn⇀ξ for some ξ∈H. Then ξ∈UA and
ΦS(ξ)≤nliminfΦSn(ξn).