TheoremBase

Weak Lower Semicontinuity of the Running-Cost Integral along a State Path

Statement

Let ll and mm be natural numbers with l≥2l\ge2 and m≥1m\ge1, let (L,G)(L,G) be population cost data on ll states with control dimension mm, and let Δl\Delta^{l} be the probability simplex. Let T>0T>0 be a real number, adopt the notation of the Lebesgue space L2([0,T];Rd)L^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}) in the case d=md=m, write H=L2([0,T];Rm)H=L^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{m}) with its pairing, norm ∥⋅∥L2\lVert\cdot\rVert_{L^{2}} and metric dL2d_{L^{2}}, and write λ=λ[0,T]\lambda=\lambda_{[0,T]} and B=B[0,T]\mathcal{B}=\mathcal{B}_{[0,T]}. Write ∣⋅∣|\cdot| for the Euclidean norm on Rk\mathbb{R}^{k}, for any natural number k≥1k\ge1, and for the absolute value on R\mathbb{R}.

Let A\mathcal{A} be a nonempty convex subset of Rm\mathbb{R}^{m} that is compact for the topology determined by the Euclidean distance, and let UA\mathcal{U}_{\mathcal{A}} be the set of A\mathcal{A}-valued controls. Assume in addition that LL is convex in the control on A\mathcal{A}, that is, that for every Σ∈Δl\Sigma\in\Delta^{l} the function A→R\mathcal{A}\to\mathbb{R} sending aa to L(Σ,a)L(\Sigma,a) is convex on A\mathcal{A}.

Call a map S:[0,T]→RlS:[0,T]\to\mathbb{R}^{l} an admissible state path if St∈ΔlS_{t}\in\Delta^{l} for every t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T] and each component of SS is measurable from ([0,T],B)([0,T],\mathcal{B}) to R\mathbb{R} with its Borel σ\sigma-algebra. Then the following hold.

1. (The running-cost integral is well defined.) Let SS be an admissible state path and let ξ∈UA\xi\in\mathcal{U}_{\mathcal{A}}. Then ξ\xi has at least one representative whose values all lie in A\mathcal{A}; denoting such a representative again by ξ\xi, as in claim 5 of the Lebesgue space, the map t↦L(St,ξ(t))t\mapsto L(S_{t},\xi(t)) is measurable and bounded, hence integrable, and the value

ΦS(ξ)=∫[0,T]L(St,ξ(t)) dλ(t),\Phi_{S}(\xi)=\int_{[0,T]}L\bigl(S_{t},\xi(t)\bigr)\,d\lambda(t),

called the running-cost integral of ξ\xi along SS, does not depend on the choice of such a representative. Moreover there is a real number C≥0C\ge0, depending only on LL, Δl\Delta^{l} and A\mathcal{A}, with ∣ΦS(ξ)∣≤CT|\Phi_{S}(\xi)|\le CT for every admissible state path SS and every ξ∈UA\xi\in\mathcal{U}_{\mathcal{A}}; consequently, for any sequence (Sn)n∈N(S^{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} of admissible state paths and any sequence (ξn)n∈N(\xi_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} in UA\mathcal{U}_{\mathcal{A}}, the real sequence (ΦSn(ξn))n∈N\bigl(\Phi_{S^{n}}(\xi_{n})\bigr)_{n\in\mathbb{N}} is a bounded sequence, so its limit inferior is defined.

2. (Convex closed sublevel sets.) Let SS be an admissible state path and let MM be a real number. The set CM={ξ∈UA:ΦS(ξ)≤M}C_{M}=\{\xi\in\mathcal{U}_{\mathcal{A}}:\Phi_{S}(\xi)\le M\} is a convex subset of HH and is closed for the topology of metric open subsets determined by dL2d_{L^{2}}.

3. (Weak lower semicontinuity.) Let SS be an admissible state path, let (ξn)n∈N(\xi_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} be a sequence in UA\mathcal{U}_{\mathcal{A}}, let ξ∈H\xi\in H with ξn⇀ξ\xi_{n}\rightharpoonup\xi in the sense of weak convergence. Then ξ∈UA\xi\in\mathcal{U}_{\mathcal{A}} and

ΦS(ξ)≤lim inf⁡nΦS(ξn).\Phi_{S}(\xi)\le\liminf_{n}\Phi_{S}(\xi_{n}).

4. (Uniformly convergent states.) Let SS and SnS^{n} (n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}) be admissible state paths such that for every real ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} with ∣Stn−St∣≤ε|S^{n}_{t}-S_{t}|\le\varepsilon for every t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T] and every n≥Nn\ge N, let (ξn)n∈N(\xi_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} be a sequence in UA\mathcal{U}_{\mathcal{A}} with ξn⇀ξ\xi_{n}\rightharpoonup\xi for some ξ∈H\xi\in H. Then ξ∈UA\xi\in\mathcal{U}_{\mathcal{A}} and

ΦS(ξ)≤lim inf⁡nΦSn(ξn).\Phi_{S}(\xi)\le\liminf_{n}\Phi_{S^{n}}(\xi_{n}).

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…