TheoremBase

Existence, Uniqueness, and Regularity for the Controlled N-Agent Dynamics

theoremProbabilitythm:n-agent-dynamics-existence-2026a
byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Statement flagged by 0 users
Reason: Initial published version: existence, uniqueness, event-count bound, adaptedness, cost well-definedness, and clock-reading bound for the controlled N-agent dynamics (arXiv:2105.05974, Section 2); batch publication approved by coauthor.

Statement

Let NN, ll, l~\tilde{l}, mm be natural numbers with N1N\ge1, l2l\ge2, l~1\tilde{l}\ge1, m1m\ge1, let β\beta be a transition-rate family on ll states with control dimension mm and rate bound BB, let β~\tilde{\beta} be an observation-rate family on ll states with l~\tilde{l} observation channels and rate bound B~\tilde{B}, and let T>0T>0 be a real number.

(i) (Driving systems exist.) For every family (px)(p_x) of nonnegative real numbers indexed by x{1,,l}Nx\in\{1,\dots,l\}^N with xpx=1\sum_x p_x=1, there exists an NN-agent driving system whose initial states satisfy P(ς01=x1,,ς0N=xN)=pxP(\varsigma^1_0=x_1,\dots,\varsigma^N_0=x_N)=p_x for every x=(x1,,xN)x=(x_1,\dots,x_N).

(ii) (Existence and uniqueness of solutions.) For every NN-agent driving system (Ω,F,P)(\Omega,\mathcal{F},P) and every observation-driven control policy hh with horizon TT, control dimension mm, and l~\tilde{l} channels, there exists a solution of the controlled NN-agent dynamics on [0,T][0,T]; and any two solutions (σi,Υυ,α)(\sigma^i,\Upsilon^\upsilon,\alpha) and (σ^i,Υ^υ,α^)(\hat{\sigma}^i,\hat{\Upsilon}^\upsilon,\hat{\alpha}) are indistinguishable: almost surely, for all t[0,T]t\in[0,T], σti=σ^ti\sigma^i_t=\hat{\sigma}^i_t for all ii, Υtυ=Υ^tυ\Upsilon^\upsilon_t=\hat{\Upsilon}^\upsilon_t for all υ\upsilon, and αt=α^t\alpha_t=\hat{\alpha}_t.

(iii) (Event count bound.) For any solution, almost surely, for all t[0,T]t\in[0,T],

i,σγNti,σγ+i,υN~ti,υ  i,σγYBti,σγ+i,υY~B~ti,υ,\sum_{i,\sigma\neq\gamma}N^{i,\sigma\gamma}_t+\sum_{i,\upsilon}\tilde{N}^{i,\upsilon}_t\ \le\ \sum_{i,\sigma\neq\gamma}Y^{i,\sigma\gamma}_{Bt}+\sum_{i,\upsilon}\tilde{Y}^{i,\upsilon}_{\tilde{B}t},

where the sums run over i{1,,N}i\in\{1,\dots,N\}, ordered pairs (σ,γ)(\sigma,\gamma) with σγ\sigma\neq\gamma, and υ{1,,l~}\upsilon\in\{1,\dots,\tilde{l}\}. In particular, since each variable on the right has the Poisson distribution and finite second moment, every counter Nti,σγN^{i,\sigma\gamma}_t and N~ti,υ\tilde{N}^{i,\upsilon}_t is square-integrable.

(iv) (Adaptedness.) For any solution, the processes σi\sigma^i, ηi,γ\eta^{i,\gamma}, Σγ\Sigma^\gamma, Ni,σγN^{i,\sigma\gamma}, N~i,υ\tilde{N}^{i,\upsilon}, Ai,σγA^{i,\sigma\gamma}, A~i,υ\tilde{A}^{i,\upsilon}, and Υυ\Upsilon^\upsilon are adapted to the system filtration (Ftsys)t[0,T](\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_t)_{t\in[0,T]} of the solution; for every t[0,T]t\in[0,T], the observation-event count KtK_t, the observation event times τj\tau_j with jKtj\le K_t, and their channels υj\upsilon_j with jKtj\le K_t are measurable with respect to the observation filtration Gt\mathcal{G}_t of the solution; and each component αtj\alpha^j_t of the control is Gt\mathcal{G}_t-measurable.

(v) (Cost well-definedness.) Let (L,G)(L,G) be population cost data on ll states with control dimension mm. For any solution, almost surely the path tL(Σt,αt)t\mapsto L(\Sigma_t,\alpha_t) is measurable on [0,T][0,T] with the trace Borel σ\sigma-algebra and is bounded below by CL-C_L, so that the Lebesgue integral [0,T]L(Σt,αt)dt\int_{[0,T]}L(\Sigma_t,\alpha_t)\,dt exists in (,+](-\infty,+\infty]. Moreover the map

ω[0,T]L(Σt,αt)dt+G(ΣT)\omega\mapsto\int_{[0,T]}L(\Sigma_t,\alpha_t)\,dt+G(\Sigma_T)

is measurable as an extended-real-valued map (the sets on which it is at most aa are events for every real aa), it is bounded below by the constant CLTCG-C_LT-C_G, and therefore its expectation is well defined in (,+](-\infty,+\infty] as the limit of the expectations of its truncations at level nn as nn\to\infty.

(vi) (Clock-reading bound.) For any solution, fix r[0,T]r\in[0,T] and nonnegative real numbers ci,σγc_{i,\sigma\gamma} (one for each transition clock) and ci,υc_{i,\upsilon} (one for each observation clock), and let CC be the event that Ari,σγci,σγA^{i,\sigma\gamma}_r\le c_{i,\sigma\gamma} and A~ri,υci,υ\tilde{A}^{i,\upsilon}_r\le c_{i,\upsilon} for all indices. Let H\mathcal{H} denote the σ\sigma-algebra generated by the initial states ς01,,ς0N\varsigma^1_0,\dots,\varsigma^N_0 together with the clock variables Yui,σγY^{i,\sigma\gamma}_u for 0uci,σγ0\le u\le c_{i,\sigma\gamma} and Y~ui,υ\tilde{Y}^{i,\upsilon}_u for 0uci,υ0\le u\le c_{i,\upsilon} (all indices). Then the event CC agrees up to an event of probability zero with an event of H\mathcal{H}, and for every event FFrsysF\in\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_r there is an event HHH\in\mathcal{H} such that the symmetric difference of FCF\cap C and HCH\cap C is an event of probability zero.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Proofs

Please log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites - 0 theorem dependents - 0 proof dependents

Prerequisites

No prerequisites tracked.

Dependents

No dependents yet.

Dependent proofs

No dependent proofs yet.

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Loading…