TheoremBase

Sup- and Inf-Convolutions of Bounded Viscosity Sub- and Supersolutions of the Penalty-Drift Equation on the Whole Space with a Monotone Drift

For the penalty-drift equation on the whole space with a potential of monotone gradient, the sup-convolution of a bounded viscosity subsolution (inf-convolution of a bounded supersolution) is attained within a fixed radius, lies above (below) the function, is semiconvex (semiconcave) and Lipschitz, and is a viscosity subsolution (supersolution) of the same equation with the running cost shifted by the modulus of continuity at that radius.

Statement

In the setting of Second-Order Equations on Euclidean Open Sets, let n≥1n\ge1 be a natural number. We use the notation of The Penalty-Drift Hamilton-Jacobi Equation on an Open Subset of Euclidean Space for traces, squared norms and halves, and more generally write ab\tfrac{a}{b} for ab−1ab^{-1} when a,b∈Ra,b\in\mathbb{R} and b≠0b\ne0; dEd_{E} is the Euclidean distance on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}.

Data. Let P:Rn→RP:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} be of class C2C^{2} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} with monotone gradient, that is,

(DP(x)−DP(y))⋅(x−y)≥0for all x,y∈Rn.\bigl(DP(x)-DP(y)\bigr)\cdot(x-y)\ge0\qquad\text{for all }x,y\in\mathbb{R}^{n}.

Let λ∈R\lambda\in\mathbb{R} be positive and let θ,κ∈R\theta,\kappa\in\mathbb{R} be nonnegative. Let g:Rn→Rg:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}, write [0,∞)={s∈R:0≤s}[0,\infty)=\{s\in\mathbb{R}:0\le s\}, and let ρ:[0,∞)→[0,∞)\rho:[0,\infty)\to[0,\infty) be nondecreasing (that is, ρ(s)≤ρ(s′)\rho(s)\le\rho(s') whenever 0≤s≤s′0\le s\le s') with

∣g(x)−g(y)∣≤ρ(∥x−y∥)for all x,y∈Rn.|g(x)-g(y)|\le\rho\bigl(\lVert x-y\rVert\bigr)\qquad\text{for all }x,y\in\mathbb{R}^{n}.

Let M,τ∈RM,\tau\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0≤M0\le M and 0<τ0<\tau, and let rr be the nonnegative square root of 4τM4\tau M. Let FF, F+F_{+} and F−F_{-} be the penalty-drift Hamilton-Jacobi operators on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} with potential PP, discount λ\lambda, control cost θ\theta and noise intensity κ\kappa, and with running costs gg, g+ρ(r)g+\rho(r) and g−ρ(r)g-\rho(r) respectively, where g±ρ(r)g\pm\rho(r) takes the value g(x)±ρ(r)g(x)\pm\rho(r) at xx. Viscosity subsolutions and supersolutions on the open set Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} are those of Viscosity Subsolution and Supersolution of a Second-Order Equation, and semiconvexity is on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}, a convex subset of itself directly from that definition.

Part A (sup-convolution of a subsolution). Let u:Rn→Ru:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} be a viscosity subsolution of FF on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} with ∣u(x)∣≤M|u(x)|\le M for every x∈Rnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. For x∈Rnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n} the set

{ u(y)−12τ∥x−y∥2 : y∈Rn}\Bigl\{\,u(y)-\tfrac{1}{2\tau}\lVert x-y\rVert^{2}\ :\ y\in\mathbb{R}^{n}\Bigr\}

is nonempty and bounded above by MM, so it has a least upper bound because the real numbers are Dedekind complete; let w‾(x)\overline{w}(x) be that least upper bound, which defines w‾:Rn→R\overline{w}:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}. A point y∈Rny\in\mathbb{R}^{n} is called a maximiser at xx if w‾(x)=u(y)−12τ∥x−y∥2\overline{w}(x)=u(y)-\tfrac{1}{2\tau}\lVert x-y\rVert^{2}. Then the following hold.

A1. (Maximisers) For every x∈Rnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n} there is a maximiser at xx, and every maximiser yy at xx satisfies ∥x−y∥≤r\lVert x-y\rVert\le r.

A2. (Bounds) For every x∈Rnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, u(x)≤w‾(x)≤Mu(x)\le\overline{w}(x)\le M.

A3. (Semiconvexity) w‾\overline{w} is semiconvex on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} with constant τ−1\tau^{-1}.

A4. (Lipschitz bound) w‾\overline{w} is Lipschitz from (Rn,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_{E}) to R\mathbb{R}, with the metric of The Absolute Value Metric on the Real Line, with constant τ−1r\tau^{-1}r.

A5. (Subsolution property) w‾\overline{w} is a viscosity subsolution of F+F_{+} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}.

Part B (inf-convolution of a supersolution). Let v:Rn→Rv:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} be a viscosity supersolution of FF on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} with ∣v(x)∣≤M|v(x)|\le M for every x∈Rnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. For x∈Rnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n} the set

{ v(y)+12τ∥x−y∥2 : y∈Rn}\Bigl\{\,v(y)+\tfrac{1}{2\tau}\lVert x-y\rVert^{2}\ :\ y\in\mathbb{R}^{n}\Bigr\}

is nonempty and bounded below by −M-M, so it has a greatest lower bound, namely the additive inverse of the least upper bound (which exists by Dedekind completeness) of the set of additive inverses of its elements; let w‾(x)\underline{w}(x) be that greatest lower bound, which defines w‾:Rn→R\underline{w}:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}. A point y∈Rny\in\mathbb{R}^{n} is called a minimiser at xx if w‾(x)=v(y)+12τ∥x−y∥2\underline{w}(x)=v(y)+\tfrac{1}{2\tau}\lVert x-y\rVert^{2}. Then the following hold.

B1. (Minimisers) For every x∈Rnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n} there is a minimiser at xx, and every minimiser yy at xx satisfies ∥x−y∥≤r\lVert x-y\rVert\le r.

B2. (Bounds) For every x∈Rnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, −M≤w‾(x)≤v(x)-M\le\underline{w}(x)\le v(x).

B3. (Semiconcavity) The function −w‾:Rn→R-\underline{w}:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}, whose value at xx is −w‾(x)-\underline{w}(x), is semiconvex on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} with constant τ−1\tau^{-1}.

B4. (Lipschitz bound) w‾\underline{w} is Lipschitz from (Rn,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_{E}) to R\mathbb{R} with constant τ−1r\tau^{-1}r.

B5. (Supersolution property) w‾\underline{w} is a viscosity supersolution of F−F_{-} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…