TheoremBase

Gradients of Functions with Bounded Derivatives Belong to the Tangent Space; Constants Are Tangent; the Score Identity; the Score Has Mean Zero; Translation of Tangent Fields

For a C1C^1 function of linear growth with bounded gradient, the class of its gradient lies in the tangent space of the Wasserstein space at every square-integrable measure, in particular constant fields are tangent; for a C2C^2 function with bounded first and second derivatives the defining identity of the score extends from test functions to it; and the score of a measure of finite Fisher information has mean zero.

Statement

In the setting of Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation, let μ∈P2(Rd)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), with the space L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}), the tangent space TμT_{\mu} and the test functions ψ∈Cc∞(Rd)\psi\in C^{\infty}_{c}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) as fixed there. The gradient Df(x)∈RdDf(x)\in\mathbb{R}^{d} of a function ff of class C1C^{1} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} is that of Differential Calculus and Convexity on Euclidean Open Sets: Standing Notation (ii), Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} being open by claim 1 of Euclidean Space Is Open in Itself, and Δf\Delta f is the Laplacian of a function of class C2C^{2} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}. For a∈Rda\in\mathbb{R}^{d} the constant map Rd→Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} with value aa is Borel and ∫∥a∥2 dμ=∥a∥2<∞\int\lVert a\rVert^{2}\,d\mu=\lVert a\rVert^{2}<\infty, so its class in L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) is defined and is again written aa; the translations τa\tau_{a} and push-forwards (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iv)) are as fixed there. Let MM be a nonnegative real number.

1. (Tangency) Let f:Rd→Rf:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R} be of class C1C^{1} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} with ∣∂if(x)∣≤M|\partial_{i}f(x)|\le M for all x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d} and i∈[d]i\in[d]. Then ∣f(x)∣≤∣f(0Rd)∣+d M∥x∥|f(x)|\le|f(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})|+\sqrt{d}\,M\lVert x\rVert for every xx; the gradient map x↦Df(x)x\mapsto Df(x) is Borel with ∫Rd∥Df∥2 dμ≤dM2\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert Df\rVert^{2}\,d\mu\le dM^{2}, its class in L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) is again written DfDf, and

Df∈Tμ.Df\in T_{\mu}.

2. (Constants) a∈Tμa\in T_{\mu} for every a∈Rda\in\mathbb{R}^{d}.

3. (The score identity) Suppose that μ\mu has finite Fisher information, with score ξμ\xi_{\mu}, and let ff be as in claim 1 and moreover of class C2C^{2} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} with ∣∂j∂if(x)∣≤M|\partial_{j}\partial_{i}f(x)|\le M for all x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d} and i,j∈[d]i,j\in[d]. Then Δf\Delta f is bounded and Borel, and

⟨ξμ,Df⟩μ=−∫RdΔf dμ.\langle\xi_{\mu},Df\rangle_{\mu}=-\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\Delta f\,d\mu .

4. (Mean zero) If μ\mu has finite Fisher information, with score ξμ\xi_{\mu}, then ⟨ξμ,a⟩μ=0\langle\xi_{\mu},a\rangle_{\mu}=0 for every a∈Rda\in\mathbb{R}^{d}.

5. (Translation) Let a∈Rda\in\mathbb{R}^{d}. Then (τa)#μ∈P2(Rd)(\tau_{a})_{\#}\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}). Let η∈Tμ\eta\in T_{\mu}. Then for every representative of η\eta the map x↦η(x−a)x\mapsto\eta(x-a) is Borel, its class in L2((τa)#μ;Rd)L^{2}((\tau_{a})_{\#}\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) does not depend on the representative, has the same norm as η\eta, and belongs to T(τa)#μT_{(\tau_{a})_{\#}\mu}.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…